Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP21-0229
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2022 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 10/31/2022 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/07/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: New Office Construction – 1001, 1015 & 1019 E Silverlake Rd Development Package (4th Review) DP21-0229 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 17, 2022 DUE DATE: October 18, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 30, 2022. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1. This comment was not addressed. Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e is addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on Detail 5 sheet C2 how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.d & .e, 7.4.9.B.2.f, .g & .h are met. 2. This comment was not addressed. Provided a PAAL width dimension from the wall called out under Key note 22 to the vehicle parking spaces located to the east. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a PAAL width dimension for the proposed vehicle use area. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |