Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP21-0174
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/28/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/23/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole for building 17 (MH #8, 2544.6’) is less than 12” below the first floor elevation (2545.5’). Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson | ||
| 02/23/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Section D104.3 Remoteness. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. Section D105.1 Where required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet (9144 mm), approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater. Section D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925 mm), exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. Section D105.3 Proximity to building. One or more of required access routes meeting this condition shall be located not less than 15 feet (4572 mm) and not greater than 30 feet (9144 mm) from the building and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approve by the fire code official. Section D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be placed with the approval of the fire code official. Fire sprinkler underground plans shall be submitted to and a permit obtained from TFD Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to and a permit obtained from TFD Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to and a permit obtained from TFD Plans shall show the location of the FDC's If a fire sprinkler system is required the F.D.C. shall be located on the street side in compliance with IFC 2018, Chapter 9, Section 912.2.1 Electric gates require a KNOX Gate key switch. Add note to drawings that gate requires KNOX Keys switch Section 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into ore within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet (45 720 mm) of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Tucson Fire Department Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Desk: 520-837-7033 |
||
| 02/16/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See landscape comments | ||
| 02/28/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Drainage Report: Provide tables similar to tables 2.2 and 2.3 in the retention/detention manual quantitatively showing first flush retention requirements and how they are met (tables in appendix look good, we just want to see a summary of that in the report). 2. Drainage Report: Provide existing and proposed peak flows in report for the 2,10, and 100-yr storms showing reduction of the post developed peak flows to equal or lesser than the pre developed peak flows. Current hydrologic calculations shown in the appendix show an increase in flow in the 2 and 10-yr storms. Note: The use of software such as PC-LID may be used to show detention attenuation through the use of retention 3. Clarify that detail 7 option 2 is being used per grading plan |
||
| 02/16/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: The Place at Mason Ranch ACTIVITY NO: Dp21-174 REV-1 Address: 2945 N Bear Canyon Rd Parcels: 114-51-197A Zoning: R-3 Existing Use: undisturbed Sonoran Desert, SFR Proposed Use: Multi-Family Apartments TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 15, 2023 DUE DATE: 14 days after transmittal date COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. Engineer info - The expansion calculations apply only to zoning requirements, the landscape sections have different requirements, and essentially the addition of Phase 2 has no bearing on limiting the landscape. 2. Please significantly screen back the building footprint, proposed improvements, and parking from the NPPP so that the underlying trees/shrubs/cacti can be seen clearly on the aerial. 3. Please resolve graphic conflicts on all sheets for maximum readability of native/landscape/irrigation plans. 4. Ensure that the trees in the parking lot planters adjacent to covered parking are placed so that they will not interfere with the cover. A tree every 6-9 parking spaces does not meet the intent of the requirement of UDC 7.6.4.B, please add additional trees in parking areas so that the ratio of 1 tree per 4 spaces is met, except for covered parking. 5. Chilopsis linearis is not considered a canopy tree. Please provide a species that provides maximum shade on the asphalt. Ensure that trees in vehicular use areas are planted within and adjacent to parking so that they afford the greatest amount of shade in paved areas, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. Parking islands within the parking area are preferred. 6. A grading plan is required to show how water harvesting is maximized, first flush volumes should be directed to landscape areas. Both the grading plan and water harvesting plan should match, and first flush volumes calculated and compared to plant water needs. 7. Viability is not the same as transplantability, and the calculations provided show only 6% of Mesquites are viable. Size, shape, dead wood, or mistletoe do not indicate that a tree is not viable. Please verify calculations, after which a site visit will be made to approve quantities of viable plants. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/27/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: The Place at Mason Ranch Apartments Development Package (1st Review, Revision #1) DP21-0174 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 27, 2023 DUE DATE: March 02, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is July 01, 2022. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 - Revise General Note 3 to include the existing zoning for Phase 2 to be SR. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – List the rezoning conditions on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide a lot coverage calculation on the plan, see UDC Article 6.4.3. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.G – As you are proposing phasing all calculations, i.e. vehicle & bicycle parking shall provide the total number required & provided once phase 2 is complete. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As you are proposing phasing clearly demonstrate how vehicles will be prevented from accessing phase 2 while phase 1 is being built. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – It does not appear that rezoning condition 8 has been met. The building charts on sheet 2 show 30’ height. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U – Clearly demonstrate that all rezoning conditions are met. It does not appear that condition 12 has been met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 01/17/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/31/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/18/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/20/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/24/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/02/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | DP21-0174 2945 N. Bear Canyon Rd. Comments: 1. A PIA is going to be required for this project. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/private-improvement-agreement Contact TDOT Engineering for information. DOT-Engineering-Review-Section@tucsonaz.gov Or call. 520-791-5100 Jesus Villezcas David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |