Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Approved
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - DP21-0171
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Approved
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/08/2023 | Historic | APPROVED | |||
| 03/08/2023 | Site Zoning | APPROVED | |||
| 03/08/2023 | CDRC Post Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/06/2023 | Design Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Rick Gonzalez, Architect 214 E Suffolk Drive, Tucson, Az. 85704 (520) 850-7401 gonzalezrick34@gmail.com DATE: March 5, 2023 TO: Maria Gayosso, Urban Planner/Principal Planner/Project Manager, City of Tucson FROM: Rick Gonzalez, Architect (#26992) COT On-Call Design Professional RE: Construction Documents Review, TC-COM-0123-00503 and TC-COM1122-00155 I have completed a Review of the Construction Documents for Ugly But Honest Pizza submitted in November 2022 for the purpose of determining its conformance with the Requirements of the IID. I have checked the submittal against the IID Design Requirements in the UDC Article 5.12. Submittal Requirements Status 1. The proposed building(s) shall respect the Complies scale of those buildings located in the Development Zone. 2. All new construction must be consistent N/A to this project with the prevailing setback existing within its development zone. 3. All new construction shall provide scale N/A to this project defining architectural elements or details at the first two floor levels. 4. Every commercial building frontage Complies shall provide windows, window displays, or visible activity within and adjacent to the building at the ground floor level, with a minimum of 50 percent of the building frontage providing such features. 5. A single plane of a façade at the street Complies level may not be longer than 50 feet without architectural relief or articulation by features such as windows, trellises, and arcades. façade design shall include pedestrianscaled, down-shielded, and glare controlled exterior building and window lighting 6. The front doors of all commercial and government buildings shall be visible from the street and visually highlighted by Entry Trellis graphics, lighting, marquees, or canopies & Signage - Complies 7. Modifications to the exterior of historic Complies buildings shall complement the overall historic context of the Downtown and respect the architectural integrity of the historic façade 8. Building(s) shall be designed to shield Complies adjacent buildings and public rights-of-way from reflected heat and glare 9. Adequate shade shall be provided for Complies sidewalks and pedestrian pathways, using shade structure or vegetation, where permitted by the City 10. Safe and adequate vehicular parking areas IPP Provided designed to minimize conflicts with pedestrians and bicycles shall be provided. Colors may conform to the overall color Complies palette and context of the Downtown area or may be used expressively to create visual interest, variety, and street rhythms. The rationale for an expressive or idiosyncratic use of color shall be described in the site plan submittal. 11. New buildings shall use materials, patterns, Complies and elements that relate to the traditional context of the Downtown area 12. Primary public entries shall be directly Primary entries does accessed from a sidewalk along a street rather than not access directly from a parking lot. Public access to commercial and from street, but governmental buildings shall be provided at sidewalk through outdoor dining grade. The primary floor of, and access to, residential area; technically structures may be elevated. Secondary access may complies, added entry be provided from off-street parking areas. Trellis and signage at entry gate -complies General Comments: 1. I Recommend Approval as noted in the above review and the documents indicated below.. This review is based on a Construction Documents Review of the proposed project as shown in the November, 2022 construction documents: approved stamped approved plans, I recommend to the Planning Director, approval of this Construction Documents. Sincerely, Rick Gonzalez, Architect (RGA) |
||
| 03/06/2023 | Signs | REVIEW COMPLETED | It should be noted that the Signs Division has received an application for a Singular Sign Design Option request to retain the detached sign for the new user, under case number TS-MSP0223-00004. It should be further noted that the SSDO case is separately reviewed from the approval of the Development Package and building plan set. |