Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP21-0156
Parcel: 106031180

Address:
266 W NAVAJO RD

Review Status: In Review

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - DP21-0156
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: In Review
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
N/A CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
N/A Floodplain Administration Review Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
05/12/2025 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. The installation of a 4” building sewer does not require the installation of an initial manhole, just 4” cleanouts separated by 100 feet of developed length and one cleanout within 1 foot of the entry to the right of way. Reference: Section 708.1.2, IPC 2018 and Pima County Standard Detail RWRD 401, 2021. [Second comment: The installation of a 6” private sewer collection system will require an appeal to the building official. The form is available at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-development-services/documents/appeal_form4.pdf ]
[Initial comment: The new 8” private sewer is shown connecting to an existing 6” public sewer. Provide documentation from Pima county that shows that this will be allowed. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.]
2. The current plan set shows the installation of a dead-end 6” water main. Contact Tim Rowe at Tucson Water (tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov) for assistance in determining how water can be supplied to the five duplexes. [Second comment: For the purposes of having a water meter, a parcel is required to have a minimum width of 15-feet of frontage on a water main. An easement is not considered to be frontage. Contact Tim Rowe at Tucson Water (tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov) for assistance in determining how water can be supplied to the lots. Reference: Tucson Water Remote Meter Policy, Number IV-B.08, dated 07/14/2009] [Initial comment: Explain the 5” water line. How is it connecting to the municipal water service system? How will the five lots be provided with water? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.]
05/02/2025 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT DP21-0156 • 266 W NAVAJO RD

1. Navajo Rd is under a pavement cut moratorium until November 11, 2027. Utility pavement cuts will require additional pavement repairs. Indicate the pavement repair requirements, repair limits and asphalt mix in accordance with Section 10.3.2 and 1-0.3.4 of the City of Tucson Public Utility Administrative Manual.

If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov
05/09/2025 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Resubmit a Development Package. Remove all references as a Tentative Plat. Provide Waste Stream Calculation. Show 14x40 foot clear space and maneuvering area for service truck turn around. Provide a COHERENT comment response letter outlining corrections and code compliance. Site will be reviewed as multifamily Development Package upon resubmittal.
Joshua Garcia
joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov
05/09/2025 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: TENTATIVE PLAT
ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0156
ADDRESS: 266 W NAVAJO RD
ZONING: R-2 RESIDENCE ZONE
LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape and NPPO Section review comments have been addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. Per Site Zoning determination, this site is now being reviewed as a multifamily development. Provide the following within the Site Landscape Plan set:

2. A planting plan and applicable details for required landscape borders and parking area trees.

3. An irrigation plan and applicable details for the required plantings on site.

4. A commercial rainwater harvesting plan and all applicable calculations that show that 50% of the plant water demand is met through rainwater harvesting is required. With rainwater harvesting a separate irrigation water meter is also required.

5. Provide the development package activity number, DP21-0156, adjacent to the title block on all site landscape sheets. Administrative Manual 2-06.4.3

6. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are addressed.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
05/09/2025 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Lot 22 of Sawtelle Place – Tentative Plat
Development Package (5th Review)
DP21-0156

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 9, 2025

DUE DATE: May 8, 2025

COMMENT – THIS PLAN WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED AS A TENTATIVE PLAT BUT NOW APPEARS TO BE A MULTIFAMILY PROJECT. THIS SUBMITTAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED AS A MULTIFAMILY PROJECT AND THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPLY. THE DESCRIPITION WILL NEED TO BE CHANGED IN ENERGOV. CONTACT Nick Ross.

This comment was not addressed. The submitted “response LETTER FEB 2025” does not address the last set of comments posted. COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 03, 2023.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Show the required vehicle parking on the plan.

This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Under the “PARKING CALCULAITON” you list “MULTI FAMILY DWELLING UNIT”. It does not appear that this is correct. Based on 5 individual lots with only a duplex on each lot, this is not considered multi-family.

This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Based on 5 individual lots with only a duplex on each lot, bicycle parking is not required.

This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Revise the setbacks list under the General Notes to include the required street perimeter yard setbacks for the southernmost lot, see UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.a.

This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Indicate how each individual lot will receive mail on the plan.

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – As it appears you are now proposing a multifamily development not a 5 lot subdivision remove all references to the subdivision from the plan.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Remove the reference to “TENTATIVE PLAT” from sheet 1 in the sheet index.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C – As no lots are proposed remove the reference to “LOTS 1-5” and “MINOR LAND DIVISION” from the tittle block.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0156, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Revise General Note 25 to read “EXISTING USE IS VACANT, PROPOSED USE IS MULTIFAMILY SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10”.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – Remove General Note 7 from the plan as no new lots are proposed.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.3.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The proposed 20.5’ wide PAAL does not meet the minimum 24’ PAAL width required when the PAAL provides access to 90 degree parking, see UDC Figure 7.4.6-A, Table 7.4.6-1 & 7.4.6-2.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As alley access is not allowed, UDC Article 7.4.6.K.1.a clearly demonstrate how vehicles will be prevented from accessing the alley at the north end of the vehicle use area. A back-up spur meeting UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 will be required.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include the number of van accessible parking spaces required and provided. Also, remove the reference to “1:25” from the plan as it is not applicable.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Detail 2 & 2A sheet 3 the sign mounting height is not correct. The 7’-0” should be to the lowest sign.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Keynote 12 calls out a gang mailbox directly adjacent to the southern most vehicle parking space. Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b are met for this parking space.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The long-term bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. 20 bedrooms time 0.5 = 10 required long-term bicycle parking spaces. Also, you only show 2 spaces provided in the interior of the dwelling units.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking shows 2 provide but there are no short-term bicycle parking spaces shown on the plan. Clearly show the location of the short-term bicycle parking spaces on the plan and provide a detail that clearly demonstrates how all requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B & .C are met. Short-term bicycle parking is not allowed within the dwelling units, UDC Article 7.4.9.C.2.b.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The setbacks listed on sheet 1 are not correct. For the street perimeter yard setback review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b, and for the interior review UDC Table 6.3-2.A and provide the correct perimeter yard setback information for a multifamily development.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Until comment 17 is addressed Zoning cannot determine required perimeter yard setbacks. Addition comments maybe forth coming.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Show the required sidewalks to all units on the site, TSM Sections 7-01.3.3.B & 7-01.4.1.D.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
04/17/2025 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
04/21/2025 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED