Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - DP21-0156
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 03/07/2023 | Site Landscape | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 03/29/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/29/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/29/2023 | Fire New Construction | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/29/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/29/2023 | Site Engineering | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/27/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Lot 22 of Sawtelle Place – Tentative Plat Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0156 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 27, 2023 DUE DATE: April 06, 2023 This comment was not addressed. COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 03, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – As this is a resub of Lot 22 of Sawtelle Place state that this is a ‘RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 22 SAWTELL PLACE” within the title block. 2. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0156, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Under General Note 1 you list the square footage of the existing parcel as “29,741 SF”. On the plan you list each lot as having “5,950 Sf”. 29,741/5 = 5948.2 SF for each lot. Clarify which square footage is correct. 4. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Based on information provided on the plan you are proposing a duplex on each lot. If this is the case the use listed under General Note 26 is not correct and should be listed as “DUPLEX SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10” 5. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise General Note 26 to include the existing use. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Navajo Rd: dimensioned width of paving. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.B – Provide the lot number for each lot on the plan. 8. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the existing zoning classifications for the parcels north of the alley and south of Navajo Rd on the plan with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 9. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Show the required vehicle parking on the plan. 10. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Under the “PARKING CALCULAITON” you list “MULTI FAMILY DWELLING UNIT”. It does not appear that this is correct. Based on 5 individual lots with only a duplex on each lot, this is not considered multi-family. 11. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Based on 5 individual lots with only a duplex on each lot, bicycle parking is not required. 12. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – Show the proposed “PRIVATE INGRESS EGRESS/ UTILITY EASEMENT” to be per final plat. 13. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Revise the setbacks list under the General Notes to include the required street perimeter yard setbacks for the southernmost lot, see UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.a. 14. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Indicate how each individual lot will receive mail on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nocholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |