Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - DP21-0073
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/13/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/27/2023 | Design Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | After review, based upon Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3.M. of the required deferred documents submitted to PDSD (Revision #2 documents in PRO), I recommend resubmittal of this project, as noted in Italics below: M. Design Criteria 1. Architectural Variation c. Requirements (1) The same architectural elevation shall not be repeated more often than every fourth lot. Based on the Lot Release Schedule Example provided in AVA, the requirement is met. With the understanding all lot releases maintain the exampled pattern. It is recommended a follow-up As built review be conducted to assure compliance. (2) Architectural variation may be accomplished by incorporating a minimum of two of the following design features into the affected elevations: different building footprint orientation, building elevation, garage placement, roof type, ornamentation, or architectural style. (3) Complies (3) Garage Placement. For FLD projects with over 20 or more single-family detached residential units, no more than 50% of detached residential units throughout the FLD shall be designed with garages that protrude from or are flush with the front wall of the living area or front porch of the house. (4) Based on the Lot Release Schedule Example provided in AVA, the application does not comply. More than 50% of the models show in the example (32 out of 35) are shown with garages that protrude from or are flush with the front wall of the living area or front porch of the house. d. Architectural Variation Plan Required (1) An Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) demonstrating compliance with the requirements of this section shall be prepared in accordance with the Section 2-06.5.3.E, Architectural Variation Plan, of the Administrative Manual. (2) The AVP shall be included with the subdivision plat, site plan, or building permit submittal. (3) An AVP is reviewed and considered for approval as part of the subdivision plat, site plan, or building permit review procedure, whichever is applicable, with the Design Professional included as the reviewer of the AVP. The Design Professional will review AVPs for compliance with this Section and forward his or her findings and recommendation in writing to the PDSD Director for consideration of approval. (4) The PDSD Director ’s decision may be appealed in accordance with Section3.9.1, Design Review Board Appeal Procedure. (5) Conditions of the approved AVP shall be included as notes on the approved plat or site plan, whichever applies, and the building plan. (6) An AVP shall be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Transition Edge Treatment for Adjacent Properties a. Transition Edge Treatment Where a single-family attached or multi-family FLD project is adjacent to existing single-family residential development, the FLD shall provide buffering in order to preserve the privacy of the existing residential development. Examples of buffering include, but are not limited to, landscaping, a fence, or a wall. The proposed buffering shall be included as conditions on the approved subdivision plat or site plan. Complies END OF DP REVIEW For any questions regarding the Design Professional Review, please contact Nicholas.martell@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/17/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/13/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |