Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Approved
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Permit Number - DP21-0073
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Approved
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/16/2024 | Design Review | APPROVED | To: Nicholas Martell, Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD) Re: Design Professional review comments for AVP Review: DP21-0073, BHK After review, based upon Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3.M. of the required deferred documents submitted to PDSD (Submission 2, AVP Tracker, and Elevation D), I recommend approval of the resubmittal of this project, as noted in Italics below: M. Design Criteria 1. Architectural Variation c. Requirements (1)The same architectural elevation shall not be repeated more often than every fourth lot. Based on the Lot Release Schedule Example provided in AVA, the requirement is met. With the understanding all lot releases maintain the exampled pattern. It is recommended a follow-up Asbuilt review be conducted to assure compliance. (2)Architectural variation may be accomplished by incorporating a minimum of two of the following design features into the affected elevations: different building footprint orientation, building elevation,garage placement, roof type, ornamentation, or architectural style. (3)Complies (3)Garage Placement. For FLD projects with over 20 or more single-family detached residential units, no more than 50% of detached residential units throughout the FLD shall be designed with garages that protrude from or are flush with the front wall of the living area or front porch of the house. (4)Based on the Lot Release Schedule Example provided in AVA, the application does comply. No more than 50% of the models show in the Tracker are shown with garages that protrude from or are flush with the front wall of the living area or front porch of the house. d. Architectural Variation Plan Required (1) An Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) demonstrating compliance with the requirements of this section shall be prepared in accordance with the Section 2-06.5.3.E, Architectural Variation Plan, of the Administrative Manual. (2) The AVP shall be included with the subdivisionplat, site plan, or building permit submittal. (3) An AVP is reviewed and considered for approval as part of the subdivisionplat, site plan, or building permit review procedure, whichever is applicable, with the Design Professional included as the reviewer of the AVP. The Design Professional will review AVPs for compliance with this Section and forward his or her findings and recommendation in writing to the PDSD Directorfor consideration of approval. (4) The PDSD Director s decision may be appealed in ’ accordance with Section 3.9.1, Design Review Board Appeal Procedure. (5) Conditions of the approved AVP shall be included as notes on the approved plat or site plan, whichever applies, and the building plan. (6) An AVP shall be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Transition Edge Treatment for Adjacent Properties a. Transition Edge Treatment Where a single-family attached or multi-family FLD project is adjacent to existing single-family residential development, the FLD shall provide buffering in order to preserve the privacy of the existing residential development. Examples of buffering include, but are not limited to, landscaping, a fence, or a wall. The proposed buffering shall be included as conditions on the approved subdivisionplat or site plan. Complies END OF DP REVIEW |
||
| 01/12/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/17/2024 | CDRC Post Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |