Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - DP18-0278
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/17/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 04/17/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 05/22/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/22/2023 | Design Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/22/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good Afternoon, A Request for Corrections, please resubmit the plans to addressing. Thank you, Marianna Kuglmeier Planner Pima County Development Services 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-6772 |
||
| 05/10/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Correct the development package case number to be DP18-0278. 2. The functional open space is still only described on the plans as "open space". Clearly describe the planned use of the open space and what amenities will be present. See UDC article 8.7.3.C.b.4 3. Alley access requires approval by Environmental Services and the alley shall have a minimum 20-foot wide cross section, maintained with a 12-foot wide clear travel lane. See TSM section 8-01.6.2.B. ES can be contacted directly for approval by contacting: Andy Vera Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov City of Tucson -Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/12/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 1048 N 2nd Ave - FLD Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0278 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 12, 2023 DUE DATE: May 14, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is , 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email address for the Owner/Developer listed on sheet 1. 2. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP18-0278, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. This comment was not fully addressed. Revise Site note 4A to read “TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS IS THREE (3). COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – As a general note list the total number of proposed lots. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. The vehicle parking calculation is not correct. As lots 7-B & 7-C do not abut a street that is wide enough for vehicle parking the required parking for each lot is 2 spaces on site and 1 visitor parking space in a common area for each lot. Lot 7-A requires 2 parking spaces on site and 1 space along 2nd Ave. A Board of Adjustment will be required. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Single-Family and provide a correct calculation, this is not a multi-family development. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 5. Zoning acknowledges you response to this comment, clarify why you still show a detail for short-term bicycle parking. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Single-Family and provide a correct calculation. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 6. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Clearly demonstrate how the proposed functional open space meets the definition of functional open space. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 05/18/2023 | Historic | REVIEW COMPLETED | Plans should note that any new construction shall be consistent with the West University Historic Preservation Zone (WUHPZ) and the US Secretary of the Interior's Standards. Any future construction will require review by the West University Historic Preservation Advisory Board (WUHZAB) and the Plans Review Subcommittee (PRS). |