Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0278
Parcel: 117020090

Address:
1048 N 2ND AV

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1

Permit Number - DP18-0278
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/31/2022 Commercial Plumbing APPROVED
11/14/2022 Fire New Construction APPROVED
12/01/2022 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
12/01/2022 Design Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
12/01/2022 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing REQUIRES RESUBMIT Good afternoon,



Pima County Addressing is returning DP18-0278 Tent. Plat 1048 E 2nd AV for corrections. Please see the plan for comments.






Thank you



Nicholas Jordan

Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department

201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 724-9623
11/16/2022 Historic REQUIRES RESUBMIT Applicant needs to submit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Special_Districts_Application_Instructions.pdfit for HPZ Major review
11/01/2022 NPPO REQUIRES RESUBMIT See landscape comments
10/31/2022 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Remove page TP1 Tentative Plat since this development plan is the tentative plat and the information on TP1 is for the Final plat that has yet been submitted.

2. See previous engineering comment that was not addressed – Clearly identify the functional use of the "Functional Open Space" and provide the documentation that establishes, defines, and maintains the F.O.S for the subdivision. (CC&R).

3. Show on the plans how trash pickup will be provided for each lot.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
11/01/2022 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination
FROM: Anne Warner, RLA
PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section

PROJECT:
ACTIVITY NO: DP18-0278
Address: 1048 E 2nd Ave
Zoning: HR-2
Existing Use: Single family
Proposed Use: FLD subdivision

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 1, 2022
DUE DATE: October 17, 2022
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
1. Demonstrate how the open space is functional open space. The landscape plan is not acceptable. See UDC 2-10 for landscape submittal requirements.
2. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a.
3. Consider using an organic groundcover such as mulch instead of d.g.
4. An irrigation plan and specifications are required per UDC Administration Manual 2-10.4.2.C and Technical Standards Manual Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards.
5. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted and approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. Please note that Mesquite hybrids will be considered native trees, and should be included in NPP inventory UDC 7.7.6.
6. Please distinguish between the mitigation/salvage plants and the other required plants on the legend, symbol or any other method that would communicate the information. Please note that mitigation trees are in addition to other required trees.
7. Please provide a summary of quantities of all inventoried, mitigation and TOS plants in a manner that makes it simple to cross check between landscape and NPP plans.
8. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
Select "Existing Application"
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to
the reviewer's Requires changes comments)
2) Plan Set (or individual sheets)
3) Any other items requested by review staff

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov
10/28/2022 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: 1048 N 2nd Ave - FLD
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0278

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 18, 2022

DUE DATE: October 24, 2022

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is , 2023.

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – Sheet 5 of the submitted plans appears to be a final plat and will not be reviewed with this submittal. The final plat is a separate submittal from the tentative plat. Zoning has reviewed sheet 2 as the tentative plat.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email address for the Owner/Developer listed on sheet 1.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – As the proposed FLD subdivision is a resubdivision of TUCSON LOT 7 BLK 1, provide a statement in the title block that this FLD is a resubdivision of TUCSON LOT 7 BLK 1 as recorded in Book 1, Page 19.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0 , adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – The subject property shall be centered within the one square mile area of the location map.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Label all streets that abut the subject property on the location map.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label the section, township, and range on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise Site Note 3 to read “PROPOSED USE IS SINGLE FAMLY DWELLING, FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT TO UDC ARTICLE 8.7.3.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – As a general note list the total number of proposed lots.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.8 HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONE (HPZ).”

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – The maximum allowed site coverage listed under Site Note 20 is not correct. Review UDC Table 8.7.3-1: Dimensional Standards for FLDs R-2 Zone Development Alternative “B” and provide the correct maximum site coverage.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove all references to Lot Coverage as lot coverage is not applicable in an FLD subdivision.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Provide the zoning for the parcels east of Jacobus and west of 2nd on the plan.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Single-Family and provide a correct calculation, this is not a multi-family development. Additional comments maybe forth coming.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Single-Family and provide a correct calculation.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – If short–term bicycle parking is going to be proposed to reduce the required number of vehicle parking spaces provide a short-term bicycle detail that addresses all requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1, B.2 & 7.4.9.C.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – As the development for lots 7-B & 7-C are existing the perimeter yard setbacks for the north & south property line may remain. The north, south & east perimeter yard setbacks for lot 7-A should be listed “As permitted by the City’s adopted Building Codes. The required east street perimeter yard setback for lot 7-C should be listed as 10’-0”.

20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – The maximum building height listed under Site Note 21 is not correct. Review UDC Table 8.7.3-1: Dimensional Standards for FLDs R-2 Zone Development Alternative “B” and provide the correct maximum allowed height.

21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T – Demonstrate how refuse collection will be provided to all lots.

22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - Demonstrate how mail delivery will be provided to all lots.

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

23. COMMENT: 2-06.5.2.B – Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint).

2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

24. COMMENT: -06.5.3.B – The density calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 8.7.3-1: Dimensional Standards for FLDs R-2 Zone Development Alternative “B” and provide the correct calculation.

25. COMMENT: -06.5.3.B – Cleary demonstrate how this subdivision qualifies to use the Maximum Density Option, see UDC Article 8.7.3.C.3.b.

26. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Clearly demonstrate how the proposed functional open space meets the definition of functional open space.

27. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings.

28. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.1 – As functional open space is proposed provide a copy of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. This covenant shall address access, maintenance & insurance for the open space.

29. COMMENT: – The proposed short-term bicycle parking shown on lot 7-A meets the definition of an accessory use or structure. Per UDC Article 6.6.2.B and accessory use is not allowed on a site without a primary use.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov.

To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package