Plan Review Detail
Plan Number: CIP-0925-00024
Parcel: 129122690
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - FINAL v.1
Plan Number - CIP-0925-00024
Review Name: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - FINAL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site Engineering | APPROVED | ||||
| Site Landscape | APPROVED | ||||
| Traffic Engineering Review | APPROVED | Traffic Engineering has no further comments. | |||
| Neighborhood Traffic Mitigation | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| CDRC Post Review Express | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please address reviewers comments and resubmit. | |||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | March 31, 2026 WO#T164426 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: MIRASOL PARK CIP-0925-00024 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and cannot approve the development plan submitted 3/16/2026. There are no existing facilities within the development.NO APPARENT CONFLICTS Further: TEP easements not shown on Development plans. Bk 638 Pg 28, Bk 4188 Pg 542, Bk 4455 Pg 610 & Bk 4632 Pg 633 Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Salazar (520) 305-6713 msalazar@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
|||
| Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Commercial Building | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Commercial Electrical | REVIEW COMPLETED | No comment. | |||
| Commercial Mechanical | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Commercial Plumbing | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | No comments | |||
| Outdoor Lighting | REVIEW COMPLETED | No comment. | |||
| PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Coordinate with DTM Planning for potential cost sharing agreements for ramps and driveway. | |||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | FROM: Loran Shamis PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: CIP-0925-00024 1100 E Silverlake RD Mirasol Park (2nd Review) (Final Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 2, 2026 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter explaining how each comment was addressed submitted as a formal Development Package. 1. COMMENT: Include the case number CIP-0925-00024 in the bottom right corner. 2. COMMENT: This comment was not addressed - Comment: In the project-location map identify and label the Railroad, Silverlake RD, Kino PW, and Park AV. 3. COMMENT: This comment was not addressed - Comment: Correct the use specific standards to only include “4.9.13.B & C” under project data. Remove use specific standard 4.9.13.K, as it is not applicable for the existing and proposed use in this zone. 4. COMMENT: This comment was not addressed - Correct the setback information under the site data on page two to comply with Nonresidential uses. Update the Project Data section note to say the Required Street Setback. The minimum required setback to the North, South, and West is 20’ measured from the existing property line and the minimum setback requirement to the East is 10’ measured from the existing or future property line. Include the proposed setbacks in addition to the minimum required setbacks. 5. COMMENT: This comment was not addressed: Include the total lot coverage calculations for the site. Per UDC table 6.3-2.B: Exceptions to the R-2 dimensional standards, Parks and Recreation uses are permitted a maximum 60% lot coverage. Demonstrate compliance with this standard. 6. COMMENT: This comment was not addressed - Comment: Place the C9-56-57 and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 7. COMMENT: Please include a note adjacent to the parking calculations that states “Reduced parking granted through City Manager Waiver in accordance with Section V of the Administrative Directive 1.07-6. (UDC 5.12.6.M).” 8. COMMENT: This comment was not addressed - Comment: Identify the floor area for each building. 9. COMMENT: This comment was not addressed – Comment: All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Provide the zoning classification on adjacent properties, including across any adjacent right of way. 10. COMMENT: This comment was not addressed - Comment: Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 11. COMMENT: Include a copy of the CMO waiver in the plan set. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Formal Development Package addressing the above comments, and a Comment Response Letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| TW Planning and Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Transferred to Ramiro Olivarez from Michael Asbury CONDITIONALLY APPROVED Comment: On sheet 7, Keynote 7, ensure a 5 ft horizontal distance from the outside of the LP foundation to the water service line is maintained. For any questions, please contact Ramiro at Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Water - PDSD | REVIEW COMPLETED | ACTIVITY NO. CIP-0925-00024 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1100 E Silverlake RD Tucson, AZ 85713 COMMENTS: 1. The RIM elevation of the nearest upstream manhole (#5671-08) is 2455.88 and the FFE of new building is 2456.00. Since the FFE is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole cover, a backwater valve will be required. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2024, as amended by the City of Tucson. |