Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: CIP-0925-00024
Parcel: 129122690

Review Status: Approved

Review Details: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - INITIAL v.1

Plan Number - CIP-0925-00024
Review Name: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - INITIAL v.1
Review Status: Approved
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
Traffic Engineering Review APPROVED Traffic Engineering only comment is Detail 2 on page C6.1 - striping should be white.
Building Official NOT REQUIRED Building code appeal not necessary at this time. Should an appeal be required, this will be identified by the commercial building review process.
NPPO NOT REQUIRED
Real Estate NOT REQUIRED PLease contact the Real Estate Division if any property rights need to be addressed.
TSMR/PDMR - Engineering NOT REQUIRED
Zoning Administration NOT REQUIRED
Zoning Compliance Review NOT REQUIRED
Bldg Permits - Post Review Express REVIEW COMPLETED
CDRC Post Review Express REVIEW COMPLETED Please address reviewers' comments for the next submittal. TEP will need to see again once resubmitted.
Commercial Building REVIEW COMPLETED 1. Restroom Building (floor plan and exterior elevation submitted)
Submit information and the rest of the drawings for this structure, such as cross sections, detail drawing on anchoring to concrete slab, wall details, roof details, etc. Drawings on grab bars, accessibility clearances on the floor for the water closet and lavatory.
2. Steel Footbridge (No drawings submitted)
Please submit the structural calculation and detail drawings for this steel footbridge.
Commercial Electrical REVIEW COMPLETED Commercial Electrical Review CIP-0925-00024 (1100 E Silverlake RD Tucson, AZ 85713)
Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received.
Code reference, 2018 International Building Code (IBC), 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC).


1. This is a commercial project, requiring all documents to be prepared, sealed, signed, and dated by a registered design professional. Provide complete electrical plans, design, and calculations, sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304, 2018 IBC section 107.1, 2017 NEC, City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/checklists/commercial_submittal_requirements_july2023.pdf
2. Provide an electrical plan showing any/all electrical work.
Plans shall include (as necessary for scope of work), but may not be limited to items below:
3. Electrical demo plans.
4. Provide electrical load calculations, for the Main Service Panel, Per NEC 220.40.
5. Provide a line diagram showing the new equipment being added or modified, NEC 110.2, 2018 IBC 107.1.
6. Show all wiring methods in detail for all new or modified branch circuit conductors and feeders. Conductor type and conduit size/type. Note wet use requirements. NEC arts;300 and 408.4.
7. Provide a panel schedules, showing the circuits that are being modified, added or removed or existing. NEC arts;300 and 408.4. Include panel bus rating and A.I.C. rating. IBC 107.1.
8. Designate the circuit number on the electrical plans, that corresponds to the panel schedule, at the location of each existing, new or modified light fixture, receptacle, and equipment disconnect switch, NEC arts;300 and 408.4. IBC 107.1.
9. Provide Fault Current Analysis and show new equipment AIC rating sufficient to withstand the calculated Fault Current. Provide Available Fault Current calculations from TEP transformers to all new equipment, 2017 NEC 110.24.
10. Show new Panel’s and other new equipment with AIC ratings greater than or equal to the Available Fault Currents calculated, 2017 NEC 110.10.


Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov
Commercial Mechanical REVIEW COMPLETED
Commercial Plumbing REVIEW COMPLETED
Entitlements REVIEW COMPLETED
External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) REVIEW COMPLETED Good Afternoon,

ADOT has no comments on this CIP.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.

On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 8:15 AM <noreply@eplmail.tylerapp.com> wrote:
Hello,

The City of Tucson has added you to the following case for review.
External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation REVIEW COMPLETED Approved



Regarding CIP-0925-00024, The City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department has no additional requirements for the Project and no further reviews by TPRD are required.



Description: Thanks to Tucson Delivers Proposition 407 bond funding and generous support from the Water Infrastructure Finance Authority of Arizona, Mirasol Park will soon receive lighting and electrical improvements, a resurfaced parking lot, landscape enhancements, a new comfort station, and a new play area.



Regards,



Joe Barr

Project Manager

Tucson Parks and Recreation
External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority REVIEW COMPLETED October 3, 2025
Planning and Development Services
City of Tucson
201 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ. 85701
RE: CIP-0925-00024, 1st Submittal, Mirasol Park Improvements, 1100 E Silverlake Rd, Tucson
AZ 85713, Received September 25, 2025
To whom this may concern,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on CIP-0925-00024, 1st Submittal, a development
plan for new park improvements at 1100 East Silverlake Road. This development is located in
the S.E of the quarter of the N.W. quarter of Section 19, Township 14S, Range 14E, of the Gila
and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel numbers 129-12-106A, 129-12-
2680 , and 129-12-2690, and covers approximately 4.83 ± acres, and is zoned as Residence 2
Zone (R-2). The nearest major roadway intersection is Silverlake Road and Mountain Avenue,
approximately 50 feet to the southeast of the subject development.
This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and
public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.
The Tucson Airport Authority approves the 1st submittal of this project and is not requiring a
resubmittal of this project.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this
comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-
573-4811.
Respectfully,
Scott Robidoux, C.M.
Manager of Planning
cc file
External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) REVIEW COMPLETED November 6, 2025
WO#T164426
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: Mirasol Park
CIP-0925-00024
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and cannot approve the
development plan submitted 9/25/2025. There are no existing facilities within the
development.NO APPARENT CONFLICTS. Further: Development plan does not show
TEP easements.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department,
LandReviews@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Martin Salazar
(520) 305-6713
msalazar@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED No comments
New Services/JOC REVIEW COMPLETED Tucson Water – New Area Development has no objection to the proposed work for CIP-0925-00024, for the water meter shown on sheet 9 there is a 8" PVC water main that cross the park with the PN number PN-267-1996 that the meter needs to be tie in.. For reclaimed water line locations, refer to valve map NW191414. For any questions, contact Mario Rivera Alvarez at mario.riveraalvarez3@tucsonaz.gov
Outdoor Lighting REVIEW COMPLETED Outdoor Lighting Review CIP-0925-00024 (1100 E Silverlake RD Tucson, AZ 85713)
Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received.
Code reference, 2018 International Building Code (IBC), 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC), 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC).

Outdoor Lighting Review:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/building-code/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf

1. Provide an outdoor site lighting plan that meets the requirements of OLC 104.2. Show/locate the different light sources on your site plan. Number the light fixtures on your lighting fixture table and use the same number on your site plan.
2. List the Lighting Area per OLC (E3) chapter 3 and used in Table 401.1. Specify the compliance option from Table 401.1 that is being used. Total outdoor light output shall not exceed the lumen limits listed in Table 401.1.
3. Show compliance with City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code with an approved lighting calculation in accordance with OLC 104.2.1, 401.2. Include all exterior fixtures on the property in the calculations. List shielded and unshielded lights in the calculation.
4. Show unshielded fixtures with a maximum of 3,000 lumens, OLC 401.4.
5. Show lamps with a maximum of 3500K color temperature, OLC 402.1.
6. Fixtures installed under canopies and overhangs. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall not be counted in determining the total light output when they are full cutoff light fixtures installed under canopies, building overhangs, or roof eaves, OLC 401.2.1(3).
7. Indicate whether or not a special inspection is required per sec. 104.2.2, and 106.2.

https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-development-services/documents/special_inspection_certificate_odl.pdf

8. Specify any exceptions used.

9. Provide Curfew lighting controls If applicable Per section 403.



Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov
ROW Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Driveway for parking lot should be replaced or modified to meet PAG SD 206.
ADA ramps in public ROW should be replaced or modified to up to ADA standards.
Add sidewalk connection on 28th st for pedestrian circulation.
E 28th St is under pavement moratorium. Pavement Restoration should be per Public Utility Manual.
Signs REVIEW COMPLETED
Site Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED Permit: CIP-0925-00024
Location: 1100 E Silverlake RD
Review Date: 10/9/2025
Site Engineering Comments:
1. Provide proposed cut/fill quantities on the grading sheets in accordance with TSM 2-01.0.0
2. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to each basin (Includes Stormwater Harvesting basins/landscaping). Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; b. If applicable, detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; c. If applicable, retention volume, cubic feet; d. If applicable, first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; e. If applicable, Q100 in, cubic feet per second; f. If applicable, Q100 out, cubic feet per second; g. Basin top elevation, feet; h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; and i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet. DSSDR 11.1.3
3. Provide Sight Visibility Triangles for the parking entrance along Silverlake. Silverlake RD is designated as a Collector Road. TSM 10-01.5.0
4. Wheel stops will be required along the West side parking spaces to ensure that vehicle overhang does not reduce the concrete sidewalk below the required 4’ width. UDCD 7.4.6.H
5. Due to the drainage improvements proposed, please provide a Drainage statement in accordance with DSSDR Chapters 2 & 3 & 10. Provide details and analysis for the rainwater harvesting basins and storm drains proposed.
6. Revise ADA parking sign & post detail on sheet 10 to show the required minimum height to be 7 feet minimum.


If you have any questions or concerns, please contact
Marco Contreras
Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
Site Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED
Site Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED FROM: Ramiro Olivarez
PDSD Zoning Review Section
PROJECT: CIP-0925-00024
1100 E Silverlake RD
Mirasol Park (1st Review) (Initial Review)
TRANSMITTAL DATE: ‎October 24, 2025

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

1. Comment: An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

Page 12 title names do not match in the index of sheets and title block. Correct these to match.

Page 19 through 29 titles and sheets do not match the index of sheets and title block. Correct these to match.

The index of sheets lists 32 total pages while only 29 are provided. Clarify how pages are in this Development Package.

Ensure all sheet titles in the index of sheets and corresponding title blocks are corrected to match on All sheets for consistency.

2. Comment: For the Landscape Registrant Include the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property Owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

3. Comment: Identify the brief legal description.

4. Comment: If applicable, include the administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

5. Comment: In the project-location map identify and label the Railroad, Silverlake RD, Kino PW, and Park AV.

6. Comment: Correct the use specific standards to only include “4.9.13.B & C” under project data.

7. Comment: Silverlake RD is a Major Streets & Routes. Include a general note stating “this project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria. UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R).”

Correct the setback information under the site data on page two to comply with Nonresidential uses:

a. For nonresidential and multifamily development abutting an Arterial or Collector Street the minimum required street perimeter yard is ten feet, as measured from the existing or future property line as determined by the adopted Major Streets and Routes Plane, whichever is greater. (Silverlake RD)
b. For nonresidential and multifamily development abutting a local street: the minimum required street perimeter yard is 20 feet, as measured from the street property line.

8. Comment: List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

Include the total lot coverage calculations for the site. See UDC table 6.3-2.B: Exceptions to the R-2 dimensional standards.

Ensure the property dimensions are correct. Dimension the property radii on all site sheets.

9. Comment: Place the C9-56-57 and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

10. Comment: Required motor vehicle parking for a Basketball Court is 5 spaces per court or 3 spaces per half court, if only a half court is provided; and, 15 spaces per field for Athletic Fields. The total required parking is 20 motor vehicle spaces and only 18 are proposed.


By utilizing the Individual Parking Plan (IPP), the required parking may be reduced by 25% (UDC 5.12.9.a). The proposed development provides 18 on-site parking spaces. A reduction of parking spaces beyond the required 20 parking spaces may be accomplished through an Individual Parking Plan (IPP) or through a City Manager Waiver in accordance with Section V of the Administrative Directive 1.07-6. (UDC 5.12.6.M). Zoning cannot approve until documentation of an approved modification is provided.

The City Manager Waiver will be required upon formal submittal.

11. Comment: If applicable, list additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

12. Comment: If applicable, if the property includes Protected Riparian Area add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Technical Manual Section 4-02, Floodplain, WASH, and ERZ Standard, specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riparian Area.

13. Comment: Identify the floor area for each building; Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

14. Comment: Upon formal submittal provide the development package case number adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

15. Comment: Include the dimensional standard requirements including the lot for Parks and Recreation in the R-2 zone.

16. Comment: If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

17. Comment: The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

Verify all right-of-way centerline widths are correct. If applicable, provide the related docket and page for reference to verify the widths are correct.

18. Comment: All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

19. Comment: Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

20. Comment: Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

21. Comment: Demonstrate compliance with UDC 7.4.6. (a minimum of two and one-half feet from the front of the parking space.)

Demonstrate one of the ADA vehicle parking spaces is compliant with van accessibility standards.

Include a typical parking detail.

22. Comment: If applicable, all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

23. Comment: If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

24. Comment: If applicable, see Landscape review comments for if a conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.

25. Comment: Building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

26. Comment: Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

27. Comment: Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

Depict pedestrian circulation to all abutting right-of-way.

28. Comment: Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

29. Comment: If applicable, Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

30. Comment: See Landscape Review comments as it relates to: Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

31. Comment: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on the proposed use.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Corrected CIP development package.
If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov
Storm to Shade Review REVIEW COMPLETED S2S comments in attachments.
TW New Development Review REVIEW COMPLETED Based on the information provided, Tucson Water has no objections to, or comments on, the proposed development. his project is being fed by an existing 8" PVC water main under PN Number PN-267-1996. There is also a sewer crossing in the area; a minimum 3-foot clearance must be maintained—please ensure that this minimum is achieved.

The required water meter size for each lot will be determined by a water fixture count conducted in accordance with the 2018 International Plumbing Code and Tucson Water’s Water Meter Sizing Guidelines. Tucson Water’s Water Meter Sizing Guidelines are available at the following link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/tucson-water/documents/signed_meter_sizing_guidelines_march_2020.pdf
TW Planning and Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Transferred to Michael Asbury from Stephen Espinoza
CONDITIONALLY APPRVD; Sheet 9, Keynote 9 indicates a separation of LESS than 2 feet from the bottom of the 12in Storm Drain to the top of the existing water main - Please ensure that this does not stay in conflict of SD-106
Sheet 20 shows one Desert Willow within 10 feet of the existing water main. Please relocate the tree away at least 10 feet from the outside of the root-ball of said tree.
Water - PDSD REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - DDO REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - IPP REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - MS&R REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - Variance REVIEW COMPLETED