Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: CIP-0925-00023
Parcel: 13101002L

Review Status: In Review

Review Details: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - INITIAL v.1

Plan Number - CIP-0925-00023
Review Name: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - INITIAL v.1
Review Status: In Review
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
Building Official NOT REQUIRED Building code appeal not necessary at this time. Should an appeal be required, this will be identified by the commercial building review process.
NPPO NOT REQUIRED
Real Estate NOT REQUIRED Please contact the Real Estate Division if any property rights need to be addressed.
Zoning Administration NOT REQUIRED
Zoning Compliance Review NOT REQUIRED
CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
Traffic Engineering Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
Urban Forestry PENDING ASSIGNMENT
ROW Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT DTM Review comments on proposed 30% design request.
1) Damage, Missing, or broken Sidewalk Panels along the Craycroft Rd Frontage should be replaced and brought to PAG standards
2) All Ramp Along Craycroft Rd frontage should be brough to ADA & PAG standards
3) Improvements to include accessibility routes from the property to the Right of Way frontage.
Bldg Permits - Post Review Express REVIEW COMPLETED
Commercial Building REVIEW COMPLETED Please submit your revised documents and provide a letter with a written response letter addressing each of the comments indicating how the Review comments were resolved. Additionally, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please note the submittal was incomplete and the plan review was conducted using the information presented. The subsequent review could generate more comments after original comments have been addressed.
1. Sheet 24 of 59: Please amend the plans to show the exterior accessible route connecting the accessible parking space to this structure. IBC 107.2.1
2. Sheet 25,26 of 59: Please amend the plans to dimension the critical heights on this building including roof ridge and door/window header and windowsill heights. IBC 107.2.1
3. Provide a complete Set of Plans in accordance with SECTION 107 of the 2018 IBC and the PDSD Commercial Building Plan Requirements, a complete set of fully dimensioned plans demonstrating the full scope of work shall be provided. All plans must be sealed and signed by an Architect or Engineer registered in the State of Arizona. Note. The term ‘building plans’ may refer to structural, electrical, plumbing, or any other trade regulated by the associated suite of codes adopted by the City of Tucson
4. Provide the Structural Calculations used in the design of this building and any light pole bases that might be used. Calculations must be sealed by the registered design professional
5. Provide the Geotechnical Reports used in the design of this project. Calculations must be sealed by the registered design professional
Please contact me if you have any questions about these comments.
Mark Masek
Plans Examiner – Building Safety
Planning and Development Services | City of Tucson
main 520.837.4994
email mark.masek@tucsonaz.gov
Commercial Electrical REVIEW COMPLETED Commercial Electrical Review CIP-0925-00023 (2400 S CRAYCROFT RD TUCSON, AZ 85711)
Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received.
Code reference, 2018 International Building Code (IBC), 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC).


1. This is a commercial project, requiring all documents to be prepared, sealed, signed, and dated by a registered design professional. Provide complete electrical plans, design, and calculations, sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304, 2018 IBC section 107.1, 2017 NEC, City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/checklists/commercial_submittal_requirements_july2023.pdf
2. Provide an electrical plan showing any/all electrical work.
Plans shall include, but may not be limited to items below:
3. Electrical demo plans.
4. Provide electrical load calculations, for the Main Service Panel, Per NEC 220.40.
5. Provide a line diagram showing the new equipment being added or modified, NEC 110.2, 2018 IBC 107.1.
6. Show all wiring methods in detail for all new or modified branch circuit conductors and feeders. Conductor type and conduit size/type. Note wet use requirements. NEC arts;300 and 408.4.
7. Provide a panel schedules, showing the circuits that are being modified, added or removed or existing. NEC arts;300 and 408.4. Include panel bus rating and A.I.C. rating. IBC 107.1.
8. Designate the circuit number on the electrical plans, that corresponds to the panel schedule, at the location of each existing, new or modified light fixture, receptacle, and equipment disconnect switch, NEC arts;300 and 408.4. IBC 107.1.
9. Provide Fault Current Analysis and show new equipment AIC rating sufficient to withstand the calculated Fault Current. Provide Available Fault Current calculations from TEP transformers to all new equipment, 2017 NEC 110.24.
10. Show new Panel’s and other new equipment with AIC ratings greater than or equal to the Available Fault Currents calculated, 2017 NEC 110.10.


Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov
Commercial Mechanical REVIEW COMPLETED
Commercial Plumbing REVIEW COMPLETED Provide a cleanout at the junction of the building drain and the building sewer. Reference: Section 708.1.3, IPC 2018
Entitlements REVIEW COMPLETED
Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED No comments
New Services/JOC REVIEW COMPLETED CIP-0925-00023 (2400 S CRAYCROFT RD TUCSON, AZ 85711)
Todd M. Harris Sports Complex will soon receive a new walking path connection, resurfaced parking lots, a new comfort station
Based on the information provided, Tucson Water has no objections to, or comments on, the proposed development.

If any new domestic water, irrigation water, or fire water services are needed to serve this proposed development, please contact Tucson Water’s New Services Section by calling 520-791-5164 or by sending an email to TW_Common@tucsonaz.gov.

The above comments are based on the limited preliminary information provided by the applicant and should not be construed as a complete review of the proposal. Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to:
Richard A. Sarti, P.E.

Tucson Water
New Development Administrator
Office: 520-837-2215
Cell: 520-400-4001 (preferred)
Outdoor Lighting REVIEW COMPLETED Outdoor Lighting Review CIP-0925-00023 (2400 S CRAYCROFT RD TUCSON, AZ 85711)
Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received.
Code reference, 2018 International Building Code (IBC), 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC), 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC).

Outdoor Lighting Review:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/building-code/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf

1. Provide an outdoor site lighting plan that meets the requirements of OLC 104.2. Show/locate the different light sources on your site plan. Number the light fixtures on your lighting fixture table and use the same number on your site plan.
2. List the Lighting Area per OLC (E3) chapter 3 and used in Table 401.1. Specify the compliance option from Table 401.1 that is being used. Total outdoor light output shall not exceed the lumen limits listed in Table 401.1.
3. Show compliance with City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code with an approved lighting calculation in accordance with OLC 104.2.1, 401.2. Include all exterior fixtures on the property in the calculations. List shielded and unshielded lights in the calculation.
4. Show unshielded fixtures with a maximum of 3,000 lumens, OLC 401.4.
5. Show lamps with a maximum of 3500K color temperature, OLC 402.1.
6. Fixtures installed under canopies and overhangs. Outdoor lighting fixtures shall not be counted in determining the total light output when they are full cutoff light fixtures installed under canopies, building overhangs, or roof eaves, OLC 401.2.1(3).
7. Indicate whether or not a special inspection is required per sec. 104.2.2, and 106.2.

https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-development-services/documents/special_inspection_certificate_odl.pdf

8. Specify any exceptions used.

9. Provide Curfew lighting controls If applicable Per section 403.



Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov
Signs REVIEW COMPLETED
Site Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED Permit: TD-DEV-0925-00236
Location: 855 W PRINCE RD
Review Date: 10/1/2025
Site Engineering Comments:
1. Provide Total acres of disturbance, as well as cut/fill quantities on the grading sheet. Referenced to GD01.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact
Marco Contreras
Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
Site Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED
Site Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED FROM: Ramiro Olivarez
PDSD Zoning Review Section
PROJECT: CIP-0925-00023
2400 S CRAYCROFT RD
Todd M. Harris Sports Complex (1st Review) (Initial Review)
TRANSMITTAL DATE: ‎October 22, 2025

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

1. Comment: An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

Sheet 36 is labeled sheet 28 in the lower right corner of the title block.

In the Index of sheets, Sheet 38 title is labeled as 'Landscape Plan,' but the actual Sheet title is labeled 'Landscape Overview' in the lower right corner. Sheet 27 and 37 titles in the sheet index and title block do not match.

Include Sheets 3, 13, and 24 through 26 in the index of sheets with their appropriate titles.

Ensure all sheet titles in the index of sheets and corresponding title blocks are corrected to match on All sheets for consistency.

2. Comment: Include the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property Owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

3. Comment: Identify the brief legal description.

4. Comment: If applicable, include the administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

5. Comment: In the project-location map identify the Tucson Diversion Channel wash.

6. Comment: In the project-location map identify section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

7. Comment: List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

8. Comment: List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

9. Comment: Place the C9-86-53 and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

10. Comment: Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

11. Comment: As there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. Portions of this site is with the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base – Airport Height Overlay. Include a general note stating this project is designed to meet the standards in Article 5.6 Airport Environs Zone (AEZ).

And include a general note stating this project is designed to meet the standards in Article 5.5 Gateway Corridor Zone.

12. Comment: If applicable, list additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

13. Comment: If applicable, if the property includes Protected Riparian Area add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Technical Manual Section 4-02, Floodplain, WASH, and ERZ Standard, specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riparian Area.

14. Comment: Identify the floor area for each building; Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

Additional comments may be forthcoming.

15. Comment: List the following notes:

"The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall."

"Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan."

*If applicable, "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval."

"No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

“Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public."

16. Comment: Upon formal submittal provide the development package case number adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

17. Comment: Include the Minimum number of motor vehicle spaces required and minimum required bicycle parking spaces calculation.

18. Comment: Include the dimensional standard requirements including the lot coverage calculation, 60% max for Parks and Recreation in the R-1 zone.

19. Comment: If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

20. Comment: The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

21. Comment: All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

22. Comment: Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

23. Comment: Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

24. Comment: Demonstrate compliance with UDC 7.4.6.H. (a minimum of two and one-half feet from the front of the parking space.)

25. Comment: If applicable, all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

26. Comment: If applicable, see Landscape review comments for if a conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.

27. Comment: Building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

28. Comment: Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

29. Comment: Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

30. Comment: Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

31. Comment: If applicable, Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

32. Comment: See Landscape Review comments as it relates to: Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

33. Comment: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on the proposed use.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Corrected CIP development package.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov
Storm to Shade Review REVIEW COMPLETED Comments in attachments folder
TSMR/PDMR - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
TW New Development Review REVIEW COMPLETED At this early stage in the design process Tucson Water will only cite a few observations. 1) The plan set does not delineate between potable and reclaimed water use. 2) There must never be any cross contamination between the potable system and the reclaimed system. 3) Ensure that appropriate backflow devices are in place.
TW Planning and Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED No comments to provide at this time. There is no observable impact on the existing water distribution system. If there is a need for new services or irrigation meters please contact Tucson Water's New Services Dept.
If there are any changes in the future or questions please contact michael.asbury@tucsonaz.gov
Water - PDSD REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - DDO REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - IPP REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - MS&R REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - Variance REVIEW COMPLETED