Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - FINAL v.1
Plan Number - CIP-0924-00032
Review Name: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - FINAL v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPPO | APPROVED | ||||
| Site Engineering | APPROVED | ||||
| Site Landscape | APPROVED | ||||
| Real Estate | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| TSMR/PDMR - Landscape | NOT REQUIRED | No landscape items require a TSMR or PDMR for this project. Thank you, Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Zoning Administration | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Zoning Compliance Review | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Zoning Modifications - Variance | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Traffic Engineering Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Archeological Sensitivity Complex | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The project is located within an Archaeological Sensitivity Zone. Please submit a Cultural Resources Clearance Form to PDSDHistoric@tucsonaz.gov. Once reviewed, we will determine whether monitoring is required or if the project qualifies for a waiver. The form may be found here: https://oneteam.tucsonaz.gov/team/pdsd/resources/documents/request_for_cultural_resource_clearance_form_sept_2024pdf |
|||
| Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ||||
| Building Official | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. CIP-0924-00032 PROJECT: ARMORY PARK ADDRESS/PARCEL: 222 S 5TH AVE/117-17-0590 COMMENTS: 1. Please upload any and all doscuments related to the building permit portion of this submittal. This includes but is not limited to: a. Commercial Building b. Commercial Electrical c. Commercial Plumbing d. Commercial Mechanical e. Water - PDSD f. Outdoor Lighting. 2. Include a revision letter outline where and how all of these corrections have been addressed. 3. Permit #’s TC-COM-0125-00148 & TC-COM-0125-00147 have been voided as they should not have been applied for prior to the completion of the CIP review process. More comments may be forth coming once all documentation has been submitted. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Commercial Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ||||
| Commercial Electrical | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ||||
| Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ||||
| Outdoor Lighting | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ||||
| ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CIP-0924-00032 • 222 S 5TH AV (v2) 1. Submit a lighting plan for the proposed relocation of the streetlight on 12th Ave. 2. Include the following note: • The contractor shall contact and/or coordinate any work with DTM Streets & Traffic Maintenance Division, Electric Shop (520) 791-3154 prior to relocation or placement of any street lighting or traffic control facilities. 3. The landscaping plan do not reflect the civil plan revisions. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Water - PDSD | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Incomplete set of plans submitted | |||
| CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent 90% plans to TEP | |||
| Commercial Mechanical | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Entitlements | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Special Exception Required | |||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Greetings, Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has conducted a thorough review of development plan CIP-0924-00032 and wishes to convey that there are no objections to the proposed plan. It is important to note that any costs associated with the removal or relocation of existing TEP facilities will be billed to the developer. There are currently TEP facilities within the boundaries of the proposed plat. To initiate service for the new development, please contact the New Construction Department at 520-918-8300. You are required to submit a final set of approved plans, which should include details regarding electrical load and offsite improvement plans. This information is essential for TEP to determine the most efficient way to serve your development. Should easements be necessary for any new TEP facilities, they will be acquired through a separate instrument. Thank you for your attention to these matters. We look forward to collaborating with you on this project. Respectfully, Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources Department |
|||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Historic | REVIEW COMPLETED | This has been reviewed and recommended approval by APHZAB and PRS. Pending PDSD Decision Notice. Applicants to return to review as the project progresses and as needed If you have any questions, contact Michael.Taku@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| New Services/JOC | REVIEW COMPLETED | CIP-0924-00032 - CIP - Dev Site + Comm Structure - Final v1- 222 S 5TH AV Tucson Water’s New Area Development Division offers the following comments regarding this project. 1. This submittal contained no report that documents the assertion that the existing water main that crosses this property is an existing 12” pipe buried at an average depth of 48” of cover, instead of a 16” concrete cylinder pipe. Nor does this submittal indicate what material the alleged 12” pipe is made of. If the existing water main that crosses this property was constructed of 12” concrete cylinder pipe, maintaining a minimum cover of 36” over this water main during all phases of construction may not be sufficient, and my previous comment about the need to take great care while working near this existing water still stands. Please consult with Mr. Jesus Suarez, the Water Administrator of Tucson Water’s Operational Reliability & Condition Assessment Division regarding what special precautions, if any, must be taken when working near this old transmission main. Mr. Suarez may be contacted by sending an email to Jesus.Suarez@tucsonaz.gov. 2. Sheet 3 (the demo plan) and Sheet 6 (one of the paving plan sheets) needs Keynote (like Keynote 13 on the Site Plan sheets) directing the contractor to verify the depth of the water main prior to construction, as additional protective measures may be required. 3. Sheet 5: A keynote symbol for Keynote 5 was shown in the drawing but Keynote 5 does not appear in the list of keynotes on this sheet. Revise as necessary. 4. The Development Package for this project will need be routed to Tucson Water New Area Development and Planning & Engineering staff for review and approval, to ensure the proposed development will not adversely impact the large existing water main that crosses the site. 5. The Parks and Recreation Department will need to prepare an acceptable legal description and location exhibit for the Utility Service Agreement before the Development Package can be approved. Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer Tucson Water, New Development Divisi 201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220 P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2106 tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Signs | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Loran Shamis PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Armory Park - 222 S 5TH AV Capital Improvements Project (CIP) - Final CIP-0924-00032 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 3, 2025 DUE DATE: January 24, 2025 1. COMMENT: Historic approval will be required prior to formal Development Package approval. Loran Shamis Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | Site Engineering has no items requiring a TSMR. Joshua Garcia joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| TW Planning and Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Referencing the CEC 1st Comment Response Letter_v1 TW Planning and Engineering Review comments. 1. Thank you 2. Thank you 3. Comment mentions that potholing report has been provided but is not included in review files. If you could please supply it that would be appreciated. As per design meeting with Josh Bohan, it is understood that the amenity gates will be shifted to avoid underground activities near Tucson Water line. 4. Thank you 5. Original Comment "Please clearly differentiate on plan Tucson Water vs Parks water infrastructure" Original Response "There are no public water improvements proposed on-site" New Comment "Please clearly demarcate the interface points between Tucson Water piping feeding the park and private park water lines. As it currently stands it would not be clear to a contractor which lines are whose even though there are not plans to modify Tucson Water lines - this is still important to us." |