Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - FINAL v.1
Plan Number - CIP-0825-00021
Review Name: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - FINAL v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| TSMR/PDMR - Environmental Services | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Zoning Administration | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Zoning Compliance Review | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Commercial Mechanical | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Commercial Plumbing | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Entitlements | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Neighborhood Traffic Mitigation | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| New Services/JOC | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| NPPO | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Real Estate | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Site Landscape | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Site Zoning | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| TW Planning and Engineering Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Urban Forestry | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Water - PDSD | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Zoning Modifications - DDO | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Zoning Modifications - IPP | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Zoning Modifications - MS&R | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Zoning Modifications - Variance | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: CIP-0825-00021 Location: 101 W IRVINGTON RD Review Date: 12/8/2025 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Comments: 1. The use of underground storage will be acceptable for this project on the condition that the Underground Storage Standards are met from section 4.13 of the Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Manual. Please include a letter in the next submittal addressing each single standard found in section 4.13 and how it is being met. It should be noted the Underground storage to achieve required retention is not permitted unless approval from floodplain administration is given, It will not require their approval if only detention is being achieved within the underground storage. The drainage report should also breakdown total retention/detention achieved and how much is achieved broken down to each component to ensure compliance with the underground storage. 2. Provide a retention/detention basin maintenance checklist and schedule in the Drainage report. 3. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to each basin on the site plan (Includes Stormwater Harvesting basins/landscaping). Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; b. If applicable, detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; c. If applicable, retention volume, cubic feet; d. If applicable, first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; e. If applicable, Q100 in, cubic feet per second; f. If applicable, Q100 out, cubic feet per second; g. Basin top elevation, feet; h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; and i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet. DSSDR 11.1.3 If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Building Official | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TAA, ADOT, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TAA, ADOT, and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. And Parks | |||
| Commercial Building | REVIEW COMPLETED | Please submit your revised documents and provide a letter with a written response letter addressing each of the comments indicating how the Review comments were resolved. 1. Please provide the structural calculations used for the following items in the preparation of this project. IBC 107.2.7 A. Pickle ball fence, B. Shade and shade sail structures C. Light pole bases. 2. Provide complete construction drawings for the shade and shade sail structures. IBC 107.2 3. Provide engineering or the manufacturer’s installation instructions for the playground equipment. Please contact me if you have any questions about these comments. Mark Masek Plans Examiner – Building Safety Planning and Development Services | City of Tucson main 520.837.4994 email mark.masek@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Commercial Electrical | REVIEW COMPLETED | Commercial Electrical Review CIP-0825-00021 (101 W IRVINGTON RD TUCSON, AZ 85714) Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received. Code reference, 2018 International Building Code (IBC), 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC). 1. Provide a panel schedule for the new Splash Pad Control panel. Or reference the schematics on sheet SP-601 from sheet E3.0. 2. The equipment Room Plan on sheet SP-121 does not match the ‘Existing Equipment Room Electrical Plan’ shown on sheet E1.1. Provide consistent information and equipment locations. 3. Show or Note that all applicable electrical work shall comply with, Corrosive Environment – NEC 680.7, 680.14. REF Sheet E1.1, Electrical Plan – Splash Pad Equipment Room. 4. Provide Equipotential Bonding per 680.26. the splashpad shell, reinforcing steel, perimeter surfaces, metallic components, fixed metal parts, etc., shall be bonded per 680.26. Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | REVIEW COMPLETED | Approved TPRD TPRD-ExternalReview CDRC Elliot Welch CDRC, Approved Regarding CIP-0825-00021, The City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department has no additional requirements for the Project and no further reviews by TPRD are required. Description: El Pueblo Center Address: 101 W IRVINGTON RD TUCSON AZ 85714 Parcel: 13707047A Regards, Joe Barr Project Manager Tucson Parks and Recreation 520-307-2811 |
|||
| External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | |||
| External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | |||
| External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | |||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | No comments | |||
| Outdoor Lighting | REVIEW COMPLETED | Outdoor Lighting Review CIP-0825-00021 (101 W IRVINGTON RD TUCSON, AZ 85714) Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received. Code reference, 2018 International Building Code (IBC), 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC), 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC). https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/building-code/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf 1. Show lamps with a maximum of 3500K color temperature, OLC 402.1. Lighting fixtures PN2 and PN3 do not indicate the color temperature. 2. Provide Outdoor Lighting Special Inspection Certificate. Special inspection is required for Recreation Facility Installations. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-development-services/documents/special_inspection_certificate_odl.pdf 3. Specify any exceptions used. OLC 104.2.3, exception. Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sidewalk required along street frontage on Missiondale Rd, ADA ramps should be placed at Driveway or reconstruct per PAG SD 206 | |||
| Signs | REVIEW COMPLETED | All signage must be submitted as a separate sign application | |||
| Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No traffic comments | |||
| TSMR/PDMR - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED |