Plan Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: CIP - DEVELOPMENT SITE - FINAL v.1
Plan Number - CIP-0825-00018
Review Name: CIP - DEVELOPMENT SITE - FINAL v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site Engineering | APPROVED | ||||
| Zoning Modifications - Variance | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| ROW Engineering Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. COMMENT: Add the following language to General Note 4: This property is subject to the Major Street & Route Setback Zone and UDC 5.4 2. COMMENT: If the new pedestrian gate is intended to be accessed on foot, demonstrate a safe pedestrian circulation route to it from the ROW or other pedestrian pathway on site. 3. COMMENT: Two parking spaces to the south of the gate entry appear to be inaccessible by vehicle. If so, cross hatch these and indicate that they will not be parking. If they are intended to serve as parking spaces, demonstrate how they will be accessed given their separation from the travel lane by a proposed fence. 4. COMMENT: Parking spaces must be a minimum width of 10’ when the sides of the parking space abut a vertical barrier over six inches in height, which appears to be the case for the security parking space outside the gate. Demonstrate compliance with UDC 7.4.6.D.2.b. 5. COMMENT: Numerous comments provided by Site Zoning during the initial review do not appear to have been addressed. They are provided again below: 6. Comment: Upon formal submittal provide the development package case number adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 7. Comment: Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. Label the “Granada AV” on the project-location map. 8. Comment: This site is located within PAD-2. The project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 9. Comment: Show dimension from edge of pavement (curb) to gate. 10. Comment: Clarify, where does the pedestrian crossing pavement (keynote #4) connect to. Does it connect to a sidewalk? This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. 11. Comment: Dimension the vehicle ingress and egress width driveway points. 12. Comment: Motor vehicle parking spaces are being reduced from 81 spaces to 78. The proposed plan does not meet the minimum motor vehicle parking required per La Entrada Redevelopment Pl/Planned Area Development (PAD-2). Parking reductions are listed in the PAD-2 document page VII-11. Per the PAD-2 document, commercial and public office space 1 space per 400 sq. ft. = 122 motor vehicle parking spaces. The proposed project is reducing the existing vehicle parking spaces from 81 to 78 vehicle parking spaces, making the vehicle parking less compliant. In order to reduce the motor vehicle parking as proposed a City Manager Office (CMO) Waiver will be required. 13. Comment: See Design Review comments. Site Zoning will be unable to approve the Development Package (DP) until all the Design Review Board has approved the DP. Contact Fernando Garcia, Lead Planner, Site Zoning at fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov. |
|||
| CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Commercial Plumbing | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Design Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No changes to fence design. Minimal height increase. No impact to facades or site. | |||
| External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC ADOT has no comments. Thanks, Rick Freije |
|||
| External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services | REVIEW COMPLETED | ES has no objections or adverse comment regarding this proposed project. | |||
| External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | |||
| External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | |||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | June 16, 2026 WO#T185945 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Amnin Team Dear CDRC Amnin Team Subject: Convert La Entrada Garage into a secure, badge access only p CIP-0825-00018 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 6/3/2026. There are existing facilities within the development which are depicted upon the plan. There are no apparent conflicts at this time. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. Questions regarding Land, ROW, Easement, etc., please contact the TEP Land Department Liz Boehler Right of Way Agent Consultant 520-686-1341 Landreviews@tep.com Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Fred Quintero (520) 235-6329 fquintero@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
|||
| External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | |||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | Provide/maintain Knox access at gate. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
|||
| Historic | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Signs | REVIEW COMPLETED | Any proposed signage shall be applied for under separate permits and must comply to current sign code. | |||
| Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | If any plant material is damaged or destroyed due to the placement of the new fence, please replace the plants "like for like" in another location. Thank you. Chad Keller, PLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| TW Planning and Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Please see sheet 12 for missing water feature. Please add Key Note Observing the LMA (large meter assembly) | |||
| Water - PDSD | REVIEW COMPLETED |