Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: CIP - DEVELOPMENT SITE - INITIAL v.1
Plan Number - CIP-0724-00023
Review Name: CIP - DEVELOPMENT SITE - INITIAL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TW Planning and Engineering Review | APPROVED | Tucson Water CIP Comment: Please note that per water As-Built 1999_003_001.tif (will send separately) that there are private park water lines near/directly under the proposed transformer and location. Recommend to add underground utilities to plan to prevent interferences of the infrastructure or any underground conduits. | |||
| New Services/JOC | NOT REQUIRED | CIP-0724-00023 - CIP - Dev Site - Initial v1 - 900 S RANDOLPH WY No review by Tucson Water’s New Development Section is required. The New Development Section has no developer financed projects in this area that may affect or be affected by this Capital Improvement Project. And this project is not constructing any new public water mains. Please see Tucson Water’s SW161414 valve map to see where the existing public water mains are located in this area. Copies of the valve map(s) and ‘as-built’ plans referenced in these comments may be obtained from Tucson Water’s Mapping & GIS Center by sending an e-mail request for them to TWMapInfo@tucsonaz.gov. Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer Tucson Water, New Development Section 201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220 P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2106 tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Real Estate | NOT REQUIRED | PLease notify the Real Estate Diviion if any property rights need to be acquired, abandoned or modified. | |||
| Site Landscape | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please provide information on the proposed EV stations. Indicate the height/width/depth for the individual EV stations and information on the charging company (i.e. Blink, Tesla, Charge America). Also include information on the depths of the various locations that require undergrounding. Questions? Jodie.Brown@tucsonaz.gov | |||
| CDRC Post Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Commercial Plumbing | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | No comments | |||
| ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | DTM has no comments | |||
| Signs | REVIEW COMPLETED | RE: signage review - information only (incidental signs) For: Reid Park – new EV charging stations AT: 900 S Randolph Way CIP review case: CIP-0724-00023 Reviewer: Heather Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov) Date: 8/5/24 Codes applicable to signs include: Unified Development Code (UDC, 7A, Sign Standards), National Electrical Code (NEC), Tucson - Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), International Building Code (IBC) Courtesy information review only, no signs are shown within this package. 1. UDC: A) No signs are shown proposed within the package for EV parking stations and equipment. The following is for information, as it is common for such stations to have incidental signage for safety and operations use. B) Incidental signs do not count toward allowed sign area. Such signs are under 12 square feet in size and can be detached from or attached to a building. Such signs typically are informational in purpose (i.e. office location) and meant for on site users. Such signs may be reflective in nature. When detached, position them a minimum of 5 feet from fire hydrants 18 inches from parking spaces and 2 feet from access drives. If illuminated, such signs require permits regardless of size. Please feel free to email staff for any signage questions at any location, or for other permanent, prominent signs DSD_Signs@tucsonaz.gov Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov may also be of assistance to you. |
|||
| Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | Per Nicholas Ross, the proposed electric vehicle charging stations and equipment do not necessitate submittal of a separate development package. All proposed improvements are located in non-public areas and do not reconfigure any areas outside a building. | |||
| Storm to Shade Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | S2S team has reviewed the site and determined that further review is not required. | |||
| Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Traffic Engineering review not required for this type of project. ROW Engineering will assign a TE review on necessary projects. | |||
| Water - PDSD | REVIEW COMPLETED |