Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Approved
Review Details: CIP - COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE - FINAL v.1
Plan Number - CIP-0624-00020
Review Name: CIP - COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE - FINAL v.1
Review Status: Approved
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TW Planning and Engineering Review | APPROVED | We will defer to New Area Development on review of fire flow. Because project is contained within parcel no apparent impacts to our facility infrastructure. Not necessary to include TW Planning and Engineering for further submittals for this project unless major change in footprint. | |||
| Building Official | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Zoning Administration | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Zoning Compliance Review | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Bldg Permits - Post Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Commercial Building | REVIEW COMPLETED | ACTIVITY NO. CIP-0624-00020 ADDRESS/PARCEL: (10001 S WILMOT RD TUCSON, AZ 85756) Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Building Review Section comments were addressed. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review. Review will not proceed without the response letter. COMMENTS: 1. In the Project Information, Occupancy Type row indicates 58 occupants. However, in the Occupancy Calculation it indicates 56 occupants. Please be consistent with the occupant load. 2. An exit access shall not pass through a room that can be locked to prevent egress. IBC 1016.2 Please ensure this is complied to on the door between the new training space and student registration room. 3. Please add a separate line for the occupant load calculation for the Student Registration room. This should be a separate line from the New Training Space occupant load line. 4. Direction of swing. a. Pivot or side-hinged swinging doors shall swing in the direction of egress travel where serving a room or area containing an occupant load of 50 or more persons or a Group H occupancy. IBC 1010.1.2.1 Please comply to this code section for the outer door for the Student Registration. 5. Show the clearance within the restroom such as the water closet floor clearance, as well as the turning radius. 6. Miscellaneous: a. Will the class need a projector, if so provide electrical for it. b. Will there be a need for a p.a. system, if so provide power for it. c. Is there a blackboard, if so please show it on your drawings. d. Will there be a lectern for the instructor, if so provide electrical on the floor. 7. Please locate/label the location of the bicycle rack on the Site Plan. 8. Please resubmit. |
|||
| Commercial Electrical | REVIEW COMPLETED | No comments | |||
| Commercial Mechanical | REVIEW COMPLETED | 1. EF-7 is scheduled for 350 CFM but the air balance data only identifies 340 CFM. 2. Approximately 600 CFM of outside air is being delivered to the training classroom. With the only exhaust being taken from the custodial closet, how is the room pressure being controlled? Reference: Section 403.1, IMC 2018 |
|||
| Commercial Plumbing | REVIEW COMPLETED | Provide the number of drinking fountains that complies with the requirements of Sections 2902.1 and 2902.5, IBC 2018 and Section 410.3, IPC 2018. | |||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | Separate permit for fire sprinkler work has already been issued for this project. | |||
| Historic | REVIEW COMPLETED | Buildings are not historically designated and not of historic age. Land was previously surveyed for archaeological resources. No historic review required at this time. Questions? Jodie.Brown@tucsonaz.gov | |||
| PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No impact to ROW | |||
| Signs | REVIEW COMPLETED | RE: Signage Review – Interior building wall sign For: Public Safety Training Academy Drivers Training T.I. At: 10001 S Wilmot Rd. Tucson, AZ 85756 CIP Review Case: CIP-0624-00020 Reviewer: Bobby Parsons (Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov) Date: 8/9/2024 Codes applicable to signs include: Unified Development Code (UDC, 7A, Sign Standards), National Electrical Code (NEC), Tucson - Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), International Building Code (IBC) 1. UDC: A. This property is zoned RH. A wall sign is permitted however it is restricted to nonresidential use per UDC 7A.10.2.A. The proposed sign on your plans is considered an interior site sign for visitors and is non illuminated so no sign permit will need to be obtained. Facilities management can install and maintain the sign. If new signage is proposed along Wilmot Road or the interior sign will be electrified, a sign permit must obtained. I can be reached at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov if you have additional questions about proposed signage for this location. |
|||
| Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | 1. Site Engineering has no comments | |||
| Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | Site Landscape/NPPO Section have no comments. chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Nicholas Martell Principal Planner PROJECT: CIP-0624-00020 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 19, 2024 DUE DATE: August 19, 2025 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 19, 2025 Ensure the following general notes are provided: 1. “Existing zoning is .” 2. List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 3. Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 4. Floor area for each building. 5. Percentage of gross floor area, land area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included. 6. When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: 7. Ensure All existing easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 8. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. For any questions regarding this transmittal, please contact me at Nicholas.Martell@Tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Traffic Engineering review not required for this type of project. | |||
| Water - PDSD | REVIEW COMPLETED |