Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Approved
Review Details: CIP - DEVELOPMENT SITE - INITIAL v.1
Plan Number - CIP-0525-00012
Review Name: CIP - DEVELOPMENT SITE - INITIAL v.1
Review Status: Approved
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traffic Engineering Review | APPROVED | Traffic Engineering has no comments on this project. | |||
| Real Estate | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Signs | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| CDRC Post Review Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | Please fill out the additional info screen. If there are acres of disturbance and greater than 1 acre, a dust permit may be required. Once plans are 90-100%, external reviewers will be added. Thanks | |||
| Commercial Plumbing | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Entitlements | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | no comments | |||
| New Services/JOC | REVIEW COMPLETED | CIP-0525-00012 - CIP - Dev Site - Initial v1 - 245 E GLENN ST The New Development Section has no developer financed projects in this area that may affect or be affected by this Capital Improvement Project. No further reviews by Tucson Water’s New Development Section is required, as no construction of new public water mains, or relocation of existing public water mains is proposed as part of this project. Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer Tucson Water, New Development Section 201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220 P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2106 tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| NPPO | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Loran Shamis PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Keeling Neighborhood Park Improvements Capital Improvements Project (CIP) - Initial CIP-0525-00012 (245 E GLENN ST TUCSON, AZ 85705) TRANSMITTAL DATE: DUE DATE: May 29, 2025 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.10 – Include a legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing, preferably on the first sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Provide an index of sheet in the development package on the first sheet. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Include a brief legal description in the title block. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, CIP-0525-00012, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Include the Section, Township and Range adjacent to the project-location map. The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing notes, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or functional reference system. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – If applicable, draw any proposed or existing easements on the plans with recordation information. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information regarding existing public right-of-way adjacent to the site: The name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks Proposed Development 9. COMMENT: Clarify the height of the wall along the western property line after the anti-climb fence spikes are installed. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E - The site is comprised of two parcels which require a lot combination processed through Pima County Assessors - https://www.asr.pima.gov/Downloads/Forms/ComboRequest.pdf 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Show all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any right-of-way) 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC 7.4.4-1, half basketball courts require 3 vehicular parking spaces, one of which is required to be ADA van accessible. Include a note stating the required and provided parking. If parking is provided, demonstrate compliance with UDC 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria. If the proposal does not meet this standard, provide a City Manager Waiver in accordance with Section V of the Administrative Directive 1.07-6 with the formal Development Package. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Per UDC 7.4.8-1, Basketball courts require 0.25 short-term bicycle parking spaces per court with a minimum of requirement of 2 spaces. Provide a note stating the required and provided bicycle parking. Demonstrate compliance with UDC 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria. If the proposal does not meet this standard, provide a City Manager Waiver in accordance with Section V of the Administrative Directive 1.07-6 with the formal Development Package. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Loran Shamis by email Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
|||
| Storm to Shade Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No comments | |||
| Water - PDSD | REVIEW COMPLETED |