Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: CIP-0524-00018
Parcel: 141090680

Review Status: Approved

Review Details: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - INITIAL v.1

Plan Number - CIP-0524-00018
Review Name: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - INITIAL v.1
Review Status: Approved
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
Entitlements APPROVED Application is aligned with La Estancia PAD (PAD-7) Sec.II - Development Plan. No additional entitlements application required.
TW Planning and Engineering Review APPROVED Thank you for including me in this review as I follow all Parks & Rec submittals that involve Tucson Water. At this time, please observe the comments offered by New Development/New Services from Tucson Water.
Real Estate NOT REQUIRED Please notify DTM Real Estate if any real estate rights are needed to be acquired or abandoned for this project. Thx, Bob
TSMR/PDMR - Engineering NOT REQUIRED NA, no Technical Standards Modification Request has been made
Zoning Administration NOT REQUIRED
Zoning Compliance Review NOT REQUIRED
Bldg Permits - Post Review REVIEW COMPLETED
Building Official REVIEW COMPLETED When submitting for final permits, please include the following:
1. Pima County Health Department Permits for the Splash Pad
2. Pima County Waste Water Permits and Receipts
3. Any and all special inspection certificates identified by the registrant as necessary


If you have any questions, please reach out to me via email at matthew.carlton@tucsonaz.gov
CDRC Post Review REVIEW COMPLETED It appears this will need to be reviewed by Tucson Airport Authority due to being within the fly zone, ADOT as it is within 1 mile of the freeway. Parks and Rec and Entitlements since the property is associated with a PAD, REZ and ANNEX. Addressing and TEP will need to review. If the grading disturbance area is greater than 1 acre, a dust permit will need to be obtained and uploaded to the attachments section of the permit, prior to your DP application submittal. All fyi emails will be sent to PAG, USPS and SWG today by SBermudez. Please add all needed external reviewers to your next submittal. Tucson Airport Authority, ADOT, Parks and Rec, Entitlement's and Tucson Electric Power. We will send the requests for review at that time. Please contact Sony Bermudez if you have questions at Sonya.Bermudez@tucsonaz.gov or 520-730-7979.
Commercial Building REVIEW COMPLETED 1. Provide structural calculations for the structures and also for any fencing over 7" in height. IBC 107.2.7
2. Provide interior elevations of break room showing the sink, counters, lockers are meeting the requirements of IBC Chapter 11 and 2009 A.117
3. Generate a statement of special inspections and complete a special inspection certificate. IBC 1704, Ibc107.2.1
Commercial Electrical REVIEW COMPLETED There was no BlueBeam review session available for the electrical review. This electrical review was performed by downloading the uploaded plan set file. This in turn rendered the font or wording in some cases un-legible when magnified. There may additional comments as the plans are more complete.
Commercial Mechanical REVIEW COMPLETED See Plumbing comments
Commercial Plumbing REVIEW COMPLETED No comments at this time, expect detailed comments at the next submittal.
Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
Historic REVIEW COMPLETED Property has not been previously surveyed for archaeological resources. Please submit a Cultural Resources Clearance form for the project and Historic staff can work to get one of the on-call consultants on for a Class III survey of the site. Questions? Jodie.Brown@tucsonaz.gov
New Services/JOC REVIEW COMPLETED CIP-0524-00018 - CIP - Dev Site + Comm Structure - Initial v1 – 7001 S WILMOT RD

Tucson Water’s New Development Section offers the following comments on the submittal:

1. This project is dependent upon a 12” water main in Wilmot Road proposed to be built by a developer: (Tucson Water Plan No. 2-003-2023, Project Name: Project Smoke Tree, Tucson Development Center Online #TW-WCP-1222-00033).

2. The above referenced water construction plan was accepted by New Area Development on June 7, 2023, and has just expired. Tucson Water’s New Development Section has received nothing that indicates this construction plan will be re-newed.

3. The Tucson Development Center Online portal indicates the last completed action for TW-WCP-1222-00033 was the issuance of invoices by Tucson Water’s Construction staff for Inspection and Construction water costs 245 days ago.

4. These invoices have not been paid, which indicates the construction of this 12” water main has not started. The construction status of this water main should be verified by sending an e-mail to Mr. Rogelio Gaxiola-Pacheco and Ms. Ruby Alegria of Tucson Water’s Construction Section. Their e-mail addresses are rogelio.gaxiola-pacheco@tucsonaz.gov and ruby.alegria@tucsonaz.gov.

5. These plans show new public water mains being constructed within the park, to serve new buildings and new hydrants. Therefore, all of the following actions must be taken before construction of the new public water mains may begin:
a. A Water Availability letter must be obtained for this project via the Tucson Development Center Online portal.
b. Upon the Water Availability letter being obtained, a Water Master Plan for the project must be submitted via the Tucson Development Center Online portal for Tucson Water’s New Development Section’s review and acceptance.
c. Upon the acceptance of the Water Master Plan, a detailed Water Construction Plan for the project must be submitted via the Tucson Development Center Online portal for Tucson Water’s New Development Section’s review and acceptance.
Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to:

Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer
Tucson Water, New Development Section
201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, AZ 85726-7210
(520) 837-2106
tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov
NPPO REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: NEW PARK - INSTALL UG UTILITIES, ATHLETIC FIELDS, SPLASHPAD, PRE-FAB RESTROOMS, CONCESSION BUILDING, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY
ACTIVITY NO: CIP-0524-00018
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 7001 S WILMOT RD/141090680
ZONING: PAD-7 (LA ESTANCIA PAD)

See Site Landscape Comment #4 for NPPO requirements.
Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
ROW Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Plan and profile plan required for the construction of Via Rio Pico, format should be in DTM Engineer template, visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/DTM-Engineering for template. Provide Drainage Report and Geotechnical Report.
Signs REVIEW COMPLETED RE: signage review - information
For: new park with monument sign
AT: 7001 S Wilmot Rd
Sign permit: CIP-0524-00018
Reviewer: Heather Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov)
Date: 06/13/24

Codes applicable to signs include: Unified Development Code (UDC, 7A, Sign Standards), National Electrical Code (NEC), Tucson - Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), International Building Code (IBC)

1. UDC:
A) The following information is for planning of the monument sign and for any incidental / informational signage:
B) Per PAD-7 and UDC 7A.10.2. monument signage is permitted within a non-commercial use of the PAD-7, La Estancia. The PAD zoning criteria of 7A.11.14. defers to 7A.10.2. based on underlying zoning the PAD is written on. This area of the PAD appears to be written off of R-2 zoning and similar classification.
C) The park location may have a detached monument sign at 50 square feet of sign display area (the structure may be larger than the display area, engineered plans required at 80 square feet surface area). The sign height is up to a maximum of 10 feet to top of the lettering or cabinet, depending on design. Embellishments above would not count toward sign height. Setback is taken from the street curb face, at 20’ feet to the leading edge of the sign structure, at minimum, and on the site and out of easements. The sign may be illuminated. A digital message center would be allowed, without animation of message. Outdoor lighting code requires 4400k max color temperature for an internally illuminated sign. Digital signs should dim to 200 Nits and be FCC compliant. Evidence of that is required from the manufacturer.
D) Under the PAD guidelines, all new projects, inclusive of signs, shall be reviewed by the La Estancia Design Review Committee.
E) Typically, a monument sign is reviewed via separate sign permit – including structure and affixing of any sign displays. A licensed sign contractor typically is required for this work, though permit submittal may be done via others, that contractor must be listed on the permit prior to permit issuance.
F) Provide a detail of the planned sign for review comment.
G) the maximum cumulative sign area for non-residential uses on arterial streets is 100 square feet. However, any sign 12 square feet an less in sign area or not meant to be read from right of way, such as signs 30’ or more from right of way for on site users, may require structure / attachment review, but do not count towards sign area. These signs would be incidental signs.
H) Detached or attached incidental signs should be non-illuminated, shall be a maximum sign area of 12 square feet, a maximum height of 10’ above grade to top of sign, be contained on site. Such signs may be reflective in nature. Position them to be a minimum of 5 feet from fire hydrants, 2 feet from access drives.
I) Please be advised that for permanent signs identifying the site, valued at over $1000.00, or are illuminated, their installation would be done via a licensed sign contractor. The contractor would submit plans for review (including all construction specifications and diagrams), with resulting permit issued for the installation.

Please feel free to email me for any signage questions at any location, or for other permanent, prominent signs (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov)
Site Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED 1. Include the cut/fill quantities on the plans.
2. Include a SWPPP with next submittal for review.
3. A dust control permit from ADEQ will need to be issued before issuance of the Development Package.
4. Provide a copy of the master drainage report for La Estancia PAD and show how the site is complying with the retention and detention parameters of the master drainage report.
5. Include in the next submittal the geotechnical report referenced on the grading plan.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
Site Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: NEW PARK - INSTALL UG UTILITIES, ATHLETIC FIELDS, SPLASHPAD, PRE-FAB RESTROOMS, CONCESSION BUILDING, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY
ACTIVITY NO: CIP-0524-00018
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 7001 S WILMOT RD/141090680
ZONING: PAD-7 (LA ESTANCIA PAD)

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

2. Provide the development package case number, CIP-0524-00018, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3

3. Ensure that all the PAD-7 landscape requirements are met.

4. An NPPO or an NPPO waiver is required per UDC 7.7.3-B. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, must be submitted and approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements shall be approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the UDC and Administrative Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. Aerial imagery indicates that native plants are present on-site. Please provide an NPPO with your next submittal. PDSD will provide the applicant with the NPPO Waiver form upon request.

5. Add plant quantities to the landscape legend.

6. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for trees located near hardscape areas. (see Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects

7. Provide rotor sprinkler head layout on the irrigation plans.

8. If riparian mitigation is required, provide a Riparian Habitat Mitigation Plan.

9. Label sight visibility triangles on all landscape plans.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
Site Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Wyatt Berger
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Robert Price Park Development Package
Capital Improvement Project (30% plans)
CIP-0524-00018

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 21, 2024

DUE DATE: June 13, 2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06, and the Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

1. Please be aware that a separate building permit will be required for the proposal. The approved improvement drawings will be compared to the building plans in relation to building height, square footage, and footprint.

2. Development must comply with Administrative Manual Section 2-06.0.0 (Tentative Plats and Site Plans). Ensure all formatting and content requirements, as well as general notes, are provided on the cover sheet or the second sheet. At first glance, the following corrections are needed:
a. The sheet index includes 84 sheets total; however, 85 sheets were submitted. Some sheets appear to be out of order as well.
b. Include the email addresses of all firms and organizations listed on the cover sheet.
c. Provide the project number, CIP-0524-00018, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.
d. Ensure the project-location map on the cover sheet consists of a scall of 3” = 1 mile. The section corners and section number are also incorrect.
e. Add a reduced-scale map of PAD-7, La Estancia Planned Area Development, on the cover sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.
f. List of the gross site area by square footage and acreage.
g. Remove reference to use-specific standards 4.9.13.B and .C on the cover sheet as these standards are not applicable within PAD-7.
h. Add a general note to the cover sheet that states, “THE PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA OF UDC SEC. 5.6, AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE.”
i. Provide a lot coverage calculation on the cover sheet.

3. Provide La Estancia Design Review Committee approval of the project.

4. As the site consists of several parcels, provide a recorded covenant or agreement that allows for cross access within the site: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/covenant-regarding-development-and-use-of-real-property-udc-with-release.pdf.

5. Clarify whether the project is phased. Each phase will need to comply with all zoning requirements as a separate entity.

6. Include details of both standard and accessible motor vehicle parking spaces. The width of all spaces provided is unclear. Refer to UDC 7.4.6…

7. Add calculations on the number of required and proposed motor vehicle parking spaces. Provide calculations for accessible parking as well. Based on the four fields shown on the plans, 60 parking spaces are required. Additional parking is required for the future phase (courts, fitness course).

8. Add calculations on the number of required and proposed short- and long-term bicycle parking. Ensure all bicycle parking complies with UDC 7.4.9. Show a detail of these facilities.

9. Ensure all proposed motor vehicle use areas are designed in accordance with UDC 7.4.6.

10. Ensure compliance with Technical Standards Manual 7-01.4.3. All sidewalks must be a minimum of four feet wide and installed to avoid any obstruction which decreases the minimum width to less than four feet. Accessible parking space signage shall not obstruct proposed sidewalks.

11. Show pedestrian circulation in accordance with Technical Standards Manual 10-01.0.0 along the abutting rights-of-way.

12. If any of the above comments are unobtainable, a City Manager’s Office (CMO) may be used to waive one or more of these standards.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at (520) 837-4951.
Storm to Shade Review REVIEW COMPLETED -Consider calling out remnant creosote/cholla habitat to be preserved
-Consider adding depressed island to all parking lots
-Consider adding noticeable GSI features around fields and play areas to support tree shade density and to mitigate sheet flow i.e. subtle berms where needed throughout the landscape directing sheet flow towards GSI micro basins around trees / vegetation
-Consider 2” reveal on raised curb to minimize landscape flow / sediment deposition onto parking lot
-Consider flush curb on downslope side of parking lots with rock apron
-Consider using a ground cover that will create a sponge i.e. composted mulch to encourage soil health and infiltration
-Consider creating ribbons of connected organic material / ground cover to encourage movement of biological soil amendments for soil health, infiltration, and invasives mitigation
Traffic Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Driveway tie-in locations are appropriate. All other improvements appear to be outside of the public right-of-way.
Water - PDSD REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - DDO REVIEW COMPLETED Pending on zoning review comments, a DDO may or may not be required for the project. Email Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov if you have questions.
Zoning Modifications - IPP REVIEW COMPLETED Pending on zoning review comments, an IPP may or may not be required to address the number of required parking spaces for the project. Email Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov if you have questions.
Zoning Modifications - MS&R REVIEW COMPLETED Pending on zoning review comments, a MS&R modification request may or may not be required for the project. Email Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov if you have questions.
Zoning Modifications - Variance REVIEW COMPLETED Pending on zoning review comments, a variance may or may not be required for the project. Email Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov if you have questions.