Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: CIP-0325-00004
Parcel: 10304001X

Review Status: Approved

Review Details: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - INITIAL v.1

Plan Number - CIP-0325-00004
Review Name: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - INITIAL v.1
Review Status: Approved
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
Archeological Sensitivity - Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Archaeological monitoring is required. Please consult with on-call consultant under contract.
Bldg Permits - Post Review Express REVIEW COMPLETED
Building Official REVIEW COMPLETED Building official review not required at this time. Items that may require a building code appeal will be identified through the standard building review process. If required, a separate application for a building code appeal shall be submitted for review and determination.
CDRC Post Review Express REVIEW COMPLETED External Reviewers will be added once plans are between 90-100%. Please fill out additional information tab with Acres of Disturbance and Total Site Acres.
Commercial Building REVIEW COMPLETED Provide Construction Drawings, the Structural Calculations used to design the project, and the Geotechnical Report with next submittal
Commercial Electrical REVIEW COMPLETED 1. Provide a complete electrical plan-set showing all proposed electrical work.
2. Should include but not be limited to:
a. Show the location of the panel on the Electrical Plan with clear working space compliance, 2017 NEC 110.26(A).
b. Provide a panel schedule showing the circuits that are being modified and added.
c. Designate the circuit number, that corresponds to the panel schedule, at the location of each new or modified light fixture, receptacle, appliance, and equipment disconnect switch, NEC arts;300 and 408.4.
d. Show all wiring methods in detail for all branch circuit wiring along with branch circuit and breaker panel designations and correlate with the panel schedules. NEC arts;300 and 408.4.
e. Grounding and bonding of splashpad equipment and equipotential grid. The fixed metal structures must be electrically Bonded with the perimeter surface and reinforcing steel of the pool as required by ISPSC 302.1 and NEC680.26(B)(7).
f. Show or Note that all applicable electrical work shall comply with, Corrosive Environment – NEC 680.14


Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov
Commercial Mechanical REVIEW COMPLETED
Commercial Plumbing REVIEW COMPLETED
Entitlements REVIEW COMPLETED
Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
New Services/JOC REVIEW COMPLETED This is a duplicate of the TW New Development review.
NPPO REVIEW COMPLETED
Outdoor Lighting REVIEW COMPLETED Outdoor Lighting Review (Initial) CIP-0325-00004 (4300 N SILVERBELL RD TUCSON, AZ 85745)
Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received.
Code reference, 2018 International Building Code (IBC), 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC), 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC).

https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/building-code/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf

Outdoor Lighting Review:

1. Provide an outdoor lighting plan that meets the requirements of OLC 104.2. Show/locate the different light sources on your site plan. Number the light fixtures on your table and use the same number on your site plan
2. Provide recreation outdoor lighting plan per OLC chapter 6, Illumination of Recreational Facilities.
3. Show compliance with City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code with an approved lighting calculation in accordance with OLC 3.1.2. Include all exterior fixtures on the property in the calculations. Show unshielded fixtures with a maximum of 3,000 lumens, OLC 401.4. Show lamps with a maximum of 3500K color temperature, OLC 402.1.
4. Show compliance to total outdoor light output per 2012 City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code section 401.2. Total outdoor light output shall not exceed the lumen limits listed in Table 401.1. 4. E1.1 – Lighting Code section 104.2.2.
5. Submit catalogue or specification sheets of all proposed new outdoor lighting fixtures illustrating the type of fixture, color temperature, lumens rating and whether full cut-off or unshielded.

6. Indicate whether or not a special inspection is required per sec. 104.2.2, and 106.2.

7. Specify any exceptions used.

8. Provide Curfew lighting controls If applicable Per section 403.


Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov
Real Estate REVIEW COMPLETED If any proposed improvements are located outside property lines in public rights-of-way, it will require a Private Improvement Agreement with the Department of Transportation & Mobility or Temporary Revocable Easement with the Real Estate Division (separate processes). If any action is required to address property rights (dedications, easements, etc), please contact the Real Estate Division 520-791-4181.
ROW Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED
Signs REVIEW COMPLETED
Site Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
Site Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED
Site Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Loran Shamis
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Danny Lopez Park
Capital Improvements Project (CIP) - Initial
CIP-0325-00004 (4300 N SILVERBELL RD)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 8, 2025
DUE DATE: April 8, 2025

1. COMMENT: Remove aerial imagery from the site plan.
2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.10 – Include a legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing.
3. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 - Provide a index of sheets on the cover page.
4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Include the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.
5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;
6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Include the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e. sheet xx of xx) in the title block of each sheet.
7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, CIP-0325-00004, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.
8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – Include a general note stating “the existing and proposed zoning is RX-1”
9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Include a general note with the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage.
10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Include a general note stating the existing and proposed use of the property is Recreation – Parks and Recreation subject to use specific standards 4.9.13.B and C
11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Include a note stating “this project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria. UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R) – SCENIC CORRIDOR”
12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide the floor area for each building.
13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide the percentage of area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage.
14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide the percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,
15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.
16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – Provide the site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing notes, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.
17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way).
18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Demonstrate the proposed new parking meets UDC 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Design Criteria.
19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a note stating the required and proposed parking Include the parking ratios.
20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a general note stating the required and proposed bicycle parking. Include the parking ratios.
21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – Demonstrate all existing and proposed (if applicable) easements, labeled as to their purposed and whether they will be public or private.
22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and height of each proposed building in the footprint of the building.
23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate on-site pedestrian circulation is ADA compliant and meets the standards in the Technical Standards Manual 7-01.



***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Loran Shamis by email Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
Storm to Shade Review REVIEW COMPLETED Comments uploaded to attachments folder
Traffic Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED TE has no comments on these pre-submittal plans.
TSMR/PDMR - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
TW New Development Review REVIEW COMPLETED CIP-0325-00004 - CIP - Dev Site + Comm Structure - Initial v1 - 4300 N SILVERBELL RD


1. Tucson Water’s New Development Section has no developer financed projects in this area that may affect or be affected by this Capital Improvement Project.
2. Thank you for portraying the existing potable water and reclaimed water mains on the site properly.
3. No further reviews by Tucson Water’s New Development Section is required, as no construction of new public water mains, or relocation of existing public water mains is proposed as part of this project.
4. If and when any new domestic water, irrigation water, or fire water services are needed to serve this proposed development, please contact Tucson Water’s New Services Section by calling 520-791-5164 or by sending an email to TW Common@tucsonaz.gov.


Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer
Tucson Water, New Development Section
201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, AZ 85726-7210
(520) 837-2106
tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov
TW Planning and Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Please mark up all existing meters and label "to remain"
Water - PDSD REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Administration REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Compliance Review REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - DDO REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - IPP REVIEW COMPLETED
Zoning Modifications - MS&R REVIEW COMPLETED Not Required
Zoning Modifications - Variance REVIEW COMPLETED