Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - INITIAL v.1
Plan Number - CIP-0324-00008
Review Name: CIP - DEV SITE + COMM STRUCTURE - INITIAL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real Estate | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| ROW Engineering Review | NOT REQUIRED | ROW is in Pima County Jurisdiction | |||
| Signs | NOT REQUIRED | RE: signage review project: CIP-0324-00008 AT: 3700 W Pecos Way Date: 4/10/24 Reviewer: Heather Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov) The Signs Division has examined the well site structural plan set and found no review aspects for this project at this time, thank you. Please reach out to me if you need any assistance in the future. Note, should any signs be proposed, such as safety signage, please limit to these design criteria to keep as incidental and not requiring permit review: non-illuminated (reflective material ok) 12 square feet in area position on the well station wall or detached on a simple post 10' tall above grade 2' setback from the driveway curbs to leading edge of sign structure / panel 10' setback from street curbs (to leading edge of sign structure /panel) and also clearly located on the site |
|||
| Site Zoning | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Zoning Administration | NOT REQUIRED | City of Tucson Zoning standards do not apply to proposals within Pima County jurisdiction. | |||
| Zoning Compliance Review | NOT REQUIRED | City of Tucson Zoning standards do not apply to proposals within Pima County jurisdiction. | |||
| Zoning Modifications - DDO | NOT REQUIRED | City of Tucson Zoning standards do not apply to proposals within Pima County jurisdiction. | |||
| Zoning Modifications - MS&R | NOT REQUIRED | City of Tucson Zoning standards do not apply to proposals within Pima County jurisdiction. | |||
| Zoning Modifications - Variance | NOT REQUIRED | City of Tucson Zoning standards do not apply to proposals within Pima County jurisdiction. | |||
| Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: NEW WATER PRODUCTION WELL ON A TUCSON FACILITY SITE ACTIVITY NO: CIP-0324-00008 ADDRESS: 3700 W PECOS WY This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: This project occurs on Pima County Property, but the following items have been identified for compliance: 1. Aerial imagery indicates that Saguaros are present on site, and possibly other protected native plant material. Please provide an NPPO. An NPPO is required per UDC 7.7.3-B. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted or approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the UDC and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Commercial Building | REVIEW COMPLETED | Please submit your revised documents along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Building Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Please amend the Rain Intensity Criteria to reflect 3.0” as amended by the City of Tucson 2018 International Plumbing Code Amendments in Appendix B RATES OF RAINFALL FOR VARIOUS CITIES. REVISE appendix by ADDING “Tucson…3.0” under “Arizona IBC 107.2.1 2. Please provide the Soils report titled Goetechnical Evaluation WellC 128A Site Improvements West Pecos Way by Ninyo&Moore Dated May 31,2022 with the next submittal. IBC 107.2.1 Mark Masek Plans Examiner Mark.masek@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-4994 |
|||
| Commercial Electrical | REVIEW COMPLETED | Electrical plans as submitted will be approved when sealed by an EE registered in the State of Arizona. | |||
| Commercial Mechanical | REVIEW COMPLETED | The coating for the roof of the control building shall have either a 3-year aged solar reflectance index of 55 and a 3-year aged thermal emittance of 0.75 or shall have a 3-year aged solar reflectance index of 64. See key note #3 on sheets 12 of 30, 13 of 30, and 14 of 30. Reference: Sections C402.1.2 and C402.3, IECC 2018. | |||
| Commercial Plumbing | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Entitlements | REVIEW COMPLETED | No special exception required. | |||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Historic | REVIEW COMPLETED | Project will require an archaeological survey. Please submit a Cultural Resources Clearance form and the HPO can work on getting a consultant. Plans should be clear on what work will take place at the site. Questions? Jodie.Brown@tucsonaz.gov | |||
| New Services/JOC | REVIEW COMPLETED | CIP-0324-00008 - CIP - Dev Site + Comm Structure v1 – 3700 W Pecos WY Tucson Water’s New Development Section has the following comments regarding the proposed construction plan: 1. General Comment: I had a great deal of difficulty identifying the location of Well C-128A in relation to other identifiable features, such as the existing Oasis Reservoir and Booster Station existing Tucson Water Wells C-117A and C117B. Please consider adding an overall site plan for all of APN 22444054A to the plan set that shows this relationship. 2. All Sheets: All of the north arrows for the plan views should be changed to Tucson Water’s north arrow. 3. Sheet 1, Location Map: The configuration of many of the parcels shown in the location map in the upper right hand corner of Sheet 1 does not match that shown on GeoWorx or PimaMaps. Revise as necessary for consistency. 4. Sheet 1, Location Map: This location map is confusing. Show an outline of the well site in the location map, as it is shown on the following pages, and shade it. Then ensure the leader line from the label reading THIS PROJECT points to the shaded outline. 5. Sheet 1, Location Map: Add an label reading BASIS OF ELEVATION pointing to the “star” in the location map which indicates the location of Well C-117-A. 6. Sheet 1, General 12: This general note does not adequately describe where Tucson Water Geodetic Control Point #50039 is. It references WELL C-117 (OASIS). But there is no single WELL C-117. Specify whether the Control Point is at WELL C-117A or WELL C-117B in this General Note. Also, OASIS should be omitted from this General Note, as it is the name of the Reservoir and Booster Station, not the name of well where this benchmark is located. And finally, the elevation of this benchmark should read 2495.50’ NAVD88, as it’s really not possible to establish an elevation within 0.001 of a foot, and no other elevations on the plan are called out to 0.001 of a foot. 7. Sheet 1, General Notes: I was not able to find a BASIS OF BEARING anywhere in this plan set. Show a BASIS OF BEARING in General Note. 8. Sheet 2, Main Plan View: Delete the label that reads, TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION DETAIL ON SHEET C-102, and replace it with a standard cross section detail symbol that correctly shows which sheet this detail is on, as you have done on This detail appears to be on Sheet 3. 9. Sheet 2, Main Plan View: Add a label to the plan view near the property line indicating that this project is located on APN 22444054A. 10. Sheet 2, C-117B SITE PLAN – BENCHMARK detail: Add a label to this detail that reads C-117B that points to this well. 11. Sheet 3, Plan View: A label reads WELL SITE C-128A SEE SHEET 2 OF 29 FOR WELL SITE GRADING. Delete OF 29 from this label, as there are 30 sheets in this plan set. 12. Sheet 5, Profile View: A label reads, DRAINAGE FACILITY CROSSING CLEARANCE PER TW STD. DTL SD-107. This standard detail requires a minimum of 36” between the bottom of the drainage pipe and the top of the water main. The profile shows significantly less clearance than this. Revise as necessary. 13. Shouldn’t the CONS-std-dtl_wall_plan-sheets.pdf be incorporated into the proposed construction plan? If not, please explain why. 14. A resubmittal of the proposed construction plan and a comment response letter is required. The above comments are based on the limited preliminary information provided by the applicant and should not be construed as a complete review of the proposal. Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to: Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer Tucson Water, New Development Section 201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220 P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2106 tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | Tucson codes and ordinances do not apply to sites outside of the City. | |||
| Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: NEW WATER PRODUCTION WELL ON A TUCSON WATER FACILITY SITE ACTIVITY NO: CIP-0324-00008 ADDRESS: 3700 W PECOS WY This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: This project occurs on Pima County Property, but the following items have been identified for compliance: 1. Aerial imagery indicates that Saguaros are present on site, and possibly other protected native plant material. Please provide an NPPO. An NPPO is required per UDC 7.7.3-B. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted or approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the UDC and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. 2. There is a Riparian Habitat IRA-D that bisects the property, the applicant will need the following: An Environmental Recourse Report (ERR), and if encroachment is happening into the riparian habitat area, then a Riparian Habitat Mitigation Plan will be needed as well. See UDC Section 4-02.2.5 for the requirements. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Storm to Shade Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments from Storm to Shade | |||
| Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments | |||
| Water - PDSD | REVIEW COMPLETED |