Permit: DP13-0107
Permit Details
Apply Date:
06/13/2013
Applicant:
Description:
SITE
Permit Reviews
Permit Number - DP13-0107
Permit Status: Complete
Permit Description: SITE
| Start Date | Submittal | Complete Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/13/2013 | SITE and/or GRADING | 06/25/2013 | COMPLETED |
| 06/25/2013 | SITE and/or GRADING | 09/06/2013 | COMPLETED |
| 11/04/2013 | REVISION - - 1ST | 11/05/2013 | COMPLETED |
Completed Inspections
Permit Status: Complete
Permit Number: DP13-0107
Permit Description: SITE
Total Completed Inspections - 2
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2014 | PDSD Site/Engineering Division - Landscaping | Passed | {Activity date: 04/08/2014; Status: Approved; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - } ; {Activity date: 10/04/2013; Status: Partial Approval; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND A NEW 5 FOOT PLANTER BOX HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCED ON THIS SITE, BUT NO PLANTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED FOR THESE AREAS. Per our Unified Development Code Section 7.6.4.B.1.a.1 B. Vehicular Use Areas The standards in this Section 7.6.4.B apply to all developments that provide more than four motor vehicle parking spaces, except as provided in Section 7.6.4.B.1.c, Exemptions. 1. Canopy Trees in Vehicular Use Areas a. General Standards Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. (1) The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). CONSULT ANDREW CONNOR OR JOSEPH LINVILLE FOR THE SPECIFIC PLANT/TREES THE NEED TO BE PLACED INTO THESE AREAS.} ; {Activity date: 10/03/2013; Status: Denied; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - NO ONE ON SITE AT THIS TIME.} |
|
| 04/08/2014 | ENGR Engineering Final | Passed | {Activity date: 04/08/2014; Status: Approved; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - } ; {Activity date: 11/04/2013; Status: Continued; Inspector: jgreen; Comment: Entered by JGREEN2 - Revised plan submitted for the above referenced changes. It appears that all of the Inspectors comments have been addressed. Once all Sections review the plan the applicant should be calling in a Final Inspection. JG} ; {Activity date: 10/04/2013; Status: Partial Approval; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETED AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS: 1) THE HANDI-CAP CROSSWALK FROM THE NEW BUILDING EXCEEDS THE 5% RUNNING SLOPE, THIS WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO CLOSING OUT THIS PERMIT. 2) THE CURBS ON THIS SITE ARE NOT AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. THE FINGER ISLAND ON THE NORTHSIDE OF THE WESTERN ENTRANCE HAS NOT BEEN CONSTRUCTED. THIS PLAN EITHER NEEDS TO BE REVISED DELETING THE ISLAND AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPING SECTIONS OR THE ISLAND NEEDS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. 3) THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF THE OLD BUILDING IS NO 5 FOOT IN ALL AREAS. AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE A BLOCKOUT HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AROUND THE EXISTING BACK FLOW PREVENTER. SHOW THIS ON THE REVISED DRAWINGS AND HAVE THIS APPROVED PY THE ENGINEERING AND ZONING REVIEWERS PRIOR TO CALLING IN FOR A RE-INSPECTION OF THE SITE.} ; {Activity date: 10/03/2013; Status: Denied; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - NO ONE ON SITE AT THIS TIME.} |