Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: In Violation
Inspection History: COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up
Case Number - T22DV00842
Inspection Description - COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up
Inspection Status - In Violation
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2024 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up | In Violation | 959 AM - Site meeting with homeowner and Zoning Supervisor from PDSD. Viewed an approximately 2 foot high wood retaining wall on the east property boundary and the structure that occupies the east side yard. The structure on the east side of the home is not attached to the dwelling and does not require permits based upon that condition; however the size of the structure was not verified and may require permits based upon the size of the structure if it exceeds 200 square feet. -VM | |
| 01/16/2024 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up | In Violation | Court hearing has been continued to March 14, 2024 at 9:30 AM due to a motion filed by the defendant for a continuance and granted by the Judge. -VM | |
| 03/07/2023 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up | In Violation | 1130 AM - Hearing was held and defendant was present. Defendant asked for more time to follow through the permit process. Court granted additional time to allow for this. -VM | |
| 03/07/2023 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up | In Violation | 956 AM - Responded to site due to being assigned prosecution for the existing Code Enforcement Case. Owner was standing outside upon my arrival. I spoke with owner who allowed me to look at the garage structure and storage building on the west side of the home as well as a shade structure on the east side of the home. Both the garage and storage building on the west side are attached to the structure and have electrical installed. The garage does not have a foundation and has bare gravel/dirt as the floor. There is a DDO signed from the neighbor to the west. I did make contact with that neighbor and she expressed no concerns with the structures. The homeowner has applied for permits however did not respond when corrections were required. -VM | |
| 03/14/2024 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up | In Violation | Hearing held, continuance issued until September 10, 2024 at 8:30 AM. -VM | |
| COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up | Scheduled | |||
| 06/13/2023 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up | In Violation | 1000 AM - Hearing was held, and defendant was present. Defendant reports he is working through the permit process but doesn't feel the questions PDSD are asking of him are appropriate, as he is not building a nuclear facility, just a storage area. Asked the court for a 6 month continuance. City objects to a 6 month continuance. City asserts that PDSD are the experts in Building Safety and the questions are necessary as the structures are attached to the main structure, have reduced or no setbacks which pose a certain level of hazard, and have electrical. City reports the Defendant is not taking this seriously and may need to hire a professional if he is unable to complete the drawings as required, or ultimately remove the structures, and further, requests made from him to not post pictures of the structure online cause the City to question his intent. Judge issued a 4 month continuance, hearing set for October 10 2023. -VM | |
| 10/06/2023 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up | In Violation | 246 PM - Follow up at property for upcoming court hearing. There is now illegal storage in the front yard of the property and carport. Did take pictures of the property. -VM | |
| 10/10/2023 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up | In Violation | 1000 AM - Hearing was held and defendant was present. City asks for a plea or the need to conduct a hearing to obtain a judgement on the charges as the citation was issued October 25, 2022 and it has been almost a year. Defendant pleads responsible. City asks for minimum fines to be imposed as Defendant has made progress but in a very slow manner. City suggests it may be necessary for Defendant to hire a draftsman or architect to draw his plans if he is unable to do so. Judge suspends fines, issues continuance until January 16, 2024 at 930 AM. -VM |