Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Not Ready
Inspection History: COT - ENGR - Signage Final
Permit Number - T20OT00307
Inspection Description - COT - ENGR - Signage Final
Inspection Status - Not Ready
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/27/2022 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | Not Ready | ||
| 05/21/2020 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | Hthrall1 | Approved | Entered by HTHRALL1 - 5/21/2020 - revision received with a low-profile sign and directionals - site has sufficient frontage for 6 freestanding signs overall. Revisioin is approved. |
| 04/15/2020 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | HThrall | Continued | Entered by HTHRALL1 - contractor provided inventory of number of freestanding signs for overall developed site, which includes frontage from Belvedere to Swan along 22nd Street (1200+ linear feet). Five freestanding signs noted. Staff to continue research on variance history for potential freestanding signs at the overall site. |
| 04/23/2020 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | Hthrall | Continued | Entered by HTHRALL1 - RE: sign permit review of 4/10/2020 submittal Sign Permit: T20OT00307 Site: 4690 E 22nd Street / Porsche Reviewer: H. Thrall Date: 4/23/2020 Codes: National Electrical Code (NEC) 600, Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), International Building Code (IBC) 2018, Unified Development Code (UDC) 7A. Sign Standards 1) Proposal entails wall signs, access point signs, pole sign. Contractor was emailed with submittal inquiring for inventory of freestanding signs, with clarification of intention to reduce sign heights to meet code. Awaiting response with updated plans. Staff providing formal review of 4/10/2020 submittal. Pending SDRC process, potential. Wall signs: A) indicate where dedicated circuit panel is within building for inspections B) add mounting note for power supply C) wall signs can be permitted directly, if desired - from other signs Access point signs: D) Sign D and I can be considered an interior site signs due to location at service drive, meant for on site users. Sign height and area accepted. E) Electrical and Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC) of sign D accepted. F) List construction assembly of Sign D (i.e. saddle/bolt system at top/bottom and sizes of bolts and number used?) G) Signs E, F, G & H are access point signs near the street, meant for wayfinding. Such signs may be up to 4' tall per PDSD policy shared with contractor. Signs shown exceed that height. Reduce. H) sign area of access point signs E-H accepted at 10.59 square feet due to acreage of site exceeding 1 acre. I) Note how signs D-H are constructed to be mounted to support column. (i.e. saddle/bolt system at top/bottom and size / number of bolts used?) Pole sign: J) Provide inventory of numbe of freestanding signs on site plan. (contractor indicated in email 5 were present, sufficient frontage for 6 freestanding signs). K) Provide clarification if any other pole signs present (any signs over 50 sqft in area or exceed 10' tall) L) Proposed pole sign exceeds the sign area of a pole sign, 7A.10.2.C.2 (max 72 squre feet) M) Proposed pole sign exceeds the height of a pole sign, 7A.10.2.C.2 (max 12' height) N) Proposed pole sign is at a reduced setback than required for a pole sign 7A.10.2.C.2 (minimum 30') O) If it is the intention for the applicant to request a Singular Sign Design Option (SSDO), please contact staff for further assistance on the process. Please examine Section 7A.7.1. of the UDC Sign Standards to review the design criteria and findings (under the Master Sign Program list) for an SSDO to be reviewed by the Sign Design Review Committee (SDRC). Staff can provide applications for this process as well with these code aspects. P) Engineering for pole sign acknowledged, thank you. Q) Note where dedicated circuit is located within building for sign. Staff is researching the site for any prior variances, and will inform the contractor. Resubmittals may be sent to Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/10/2020 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | HThrall | Continued | Entered by HTHRALL1 - Emailed Gary Spinner of Pearsons to discuss preliminary review findings - advised of code information. Requested clarification if it was their intention to do an SDRC review for the pole sign proposed. Requested inventory of freestanding signs for entire site (includes other dealerships). |