Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Not Ready
Inspection History: COT - ENGR - Signage Final
Permit Number - T20OT00215
Inspection Description - COT - ENGR - Signage Final
Inspection Status - Not Ready
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/27/2022 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | Not Ready | ||
| 07/22/2020 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | Hthrall | Approved | Entered by HTHRALL1 - Revised plans approved |
| 07/14/2020 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | Hthrall | Continued | Entered by HTHRALL1 - Revision to plan set received on 7/14/2020 |
| 06/10/2020 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | Hthrall | Continued | Entered by HTHRALL1 - Sign Design Review Option process was conducted by Design Professional in lieu of SDRC quorum (COVID-19 safety protocols). on 6/5/2020, PDSD Director issued Notice of Decision of approval for the requested monument sign, with condition that no additional monument signs may be installed for this premise (max 2 monument signs, includes this Brake Max sign). Appeal is untl 6/19/2020. |
| 03/11/2020 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | HThrall | Continued | Entered by HTHRALL1 - RE: sign permit review for: 2nd monument sign at a premise on scenic route Site: 9191 E Tanque Verde Rd Permit: T20OT00215 Date: 3/11/2020 Reviewer: H. Thrall Codes: Unified Development Code (UDC) Sign Standards 7A, National Electric Code (NEC), Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), International Building Code 2018 (IBC) 1) Site contains another user, a storage facility, with an existing freestanding sign. To add a second monument sign requires a review under the Sign Design Review Committee (SDRC), to vary Scenic Corridor Zone District criteria of 7A.11.3, to have a maximum of two freestanding signs on a premise with less than 850' of street frontage along a scenic route. 2) Understood sign would be within height allowance (10') for a monument sign. 3) Understood sign would be within both setbacks required: A) 20' minimum setback from face of curb to leading edge of sign B) 7.5' minimum setback from property line to leading edge of sign 4) Understood sign would be no greater than 35 square feet of sign area, as it would be located within the scenic buffer, meeting code. 5) Provide night view to show light is to be emitted solely from text/characters, with background to be opaque. 6) NEC / OLC: A) List volts B) List amps C) List circuits D) Provide timer and list where located E) Provide information on where dedicated circuit and lockout would be, and where power panel would be kept F) Provide clarification on how power would be run to the sign (separate electrical permit/by others?) G) Provide Note: internal sign lighting may not exceed 4400K color temperature 7) Structural: A) provide engineering for the sign (after SDRC review process) footer, as structure is over 80 square feet surface area B) clarify if brick design is vinyl wrap or if it is a faux brick surface 8) Provide site plan from development package set with sign, show: A) sight visibility triangles B) setback from face of curb to leading edge of sign C) minimum of 7'5 setback from property line along Tanque Verde to leading edge of sign D) all property lines E) all access points F) all easements G) entire site - with existing storage development H) Note existing freestanding sign location 9) Understood applicant seeks to attend the SDRC public meeting to allow the monument sign and has provided SDRC applications for preliminary review. Applicant was emailed instructions with photos and elevation views to be provided for committee evaluation in application materials. 10) Update sign permit application with above dimensions as noted. 11) Further review comments may be forthcoming, depending on responses. Send revisions to Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov |