Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Passed
Inspection History: COT - ENGR - Signage Final
Permit Number - T19OT00930
Inspection Description - COT - ENGR - Signage Final
Inspection Status - Passed
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/23/2022 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | DROBERTS | Approved | Entered by NGARCIA3 - APPROVED |
| 06/20/2022 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | MHERNANDEZ | Partial Approval | Entered by VVERA1 - PARTIAL |
| 09/29/2021 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | Passed | {Activity date: 09/29/2021; Status: Approved; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - August 12, 2021 - electrical meter permit relocation was filed / approved by Dan Santa Cruz.} ; {Activity date: 01/22/2021; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Regarding freeway sign - revised engineering submitted 1/22/2021 for new footer and pipe size (western footer), and replace part of existing pipe on eastern footer support system.} ; {Activity date: 12/17/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Structural engineered plans and special inspection form submitted 12/17/2020 for freeway sign.} ; {Activity date: 10/28/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Board of Adjustment approved variances on 10/28/2020 for a second freeway sign for the center, and to measure that freeway sign height base grade from alternative point than I-19 edge of travel lane, essentially to allow the max 48' height to be taken from an identified spot in the median. Appeal ends 30 days.} ; {Activity date: 06/30/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Sent additional instructions by email to Veronica at Addisigns regarding items needed for mailing labels for variance process. Provided additional information on variance process steps.} ; {Activity date: 06/15/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Sent email with mailing labels form and PC Assr data from the 5 parcels of the shopping center to Veronica at Addisigns to help her request mailing labels.} ; {Activity date: 06/12/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - 06/12/2020 - advised contractor again in email that new neighborhood notice and meeting were required for public hearing. New neighborhood meeting would have to be held online due to Covid19 safety protocols.} ; {Activity date: 05/27/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Received another email 05/27/2020 from contractor with plans and variance documents for discussion.} ; {Activity date: 04/29/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Informed contractor via email that new variance neighborhood notice and meeting required. (Per review by Zoning Administrator.) Past notice was failed notice, notice area insufficient for variance process due to only 2 of 5 lots for entire center were included in requested map labels. Mapping all 5 lots showed larger notice area.} ; {Activity date: 07/06/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: hTHRALL; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - 7/1/2020 - revised plans received for review. Pending Board of Adjustment variance process (2nd freeway sign, and to measure sign height from another location than I-19 travel lane.)} ; {Activity date: 02/25/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: HThrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Board of Adjustment presubmittal meeting held 2/7 for obtaining labels. Detailed discussion held 2/25/2020 with contractor on process.} ; {Activity date: 02/06/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: HThrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - 2/6/2020 - Zoning Administrator and City Attorney determined project requires a variance process through the Board of Adjustment.} ; {Activity date: 01/24/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - RE: freeway sign review For: (replacement sign, 2nd freeway sign for premise) At: 902 W Irvington / Placita del Rio Permit: T19OT00930 Date: 1/24/20 (4th review) Reviewer: H. Thrall Codes: Unified Development Code, Sign Standards UDC 7A, Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), National Electric Code (NEC), International Building Code 2018 (IBC) ** please address comment 3 and 4 to proceed with the SSDO referral from staff) 1) Proposal shows a replacement freeway sign for freeway sign at far NW parcel of the development along I-19. (sign is within sign area, vertical clearance under the sign, proximity to I-19 ROW) 2) Removal and replacement of the freeway sign requires a Singular Sign Design Option (SSDO) review process to allow two (2) freeway signs at this shopping center premise (existing Texas Roadhouse sign, same premise). Per 7A.10.2.b, one freeway sign is permitted per premise (commercial zone). Contact staff for SDRC applications once the following review comments are addressed. 3) (Needs further response, clarifying where height is to be taken from that would allow for the height as depicted on page 6 of the submittal package) Height: 7A.6.5.B. B. Freeway grade: For freeway signs and billboards, the freeway grade (to measure height from) is the elevation of the outside edge of the freeway travel lane nearest to the freeway sign. Understood applicant is requesting an SSDO component to allow grade to be measured from a different point than I-19 travel lane. This request is due to a new ADOT wall (24' tall) erected along the property and partially blocks visibility of the existing freeway sign at the northwest side of the site, and impacts design for replacement sign. Acknowledged plans show nearby grade differences from sign base, but listed in feet difference without elevations. Revise plan to add: E) on elevation views and throughout location plan, please clarify where the nearly 10' difference in grade is at compared to the sign base grade - why two points shown that are less than 10 feet? F) page 2 indicates height taken from frontage road median - point out on the location map where that nearly 10' difference in grade is at, please. 4) (Needs clarification - add to elevation view page 6) - Add setback from property line or ADOT wall to demonstrate proposed visual proximity of sign from freeway travel lane. 5) for SSDO - please note materials used on sign (i.e, metals, masonry, etc.) 6) Structural is not being reviewed at this time. Only as a result of any potential approved SSDO process will structural be reviewed. Note that the plan indicates bolting though, clarify if using high strength bolting systems with engineering to support that, or if field welding applies - and note special inspections required for both, with custom engineering. Send revisions to Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov (Note, SSDO applications sent in an email 12/6/19. Please examine sign design criteria at the back of the application.) } ; {Activity date: 01/22/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Revised submittal received for review and to apply for Singular Sign Design Option for replacement freeway sign (2nd freeway sign for premise, to measure sign height from a different point than I-19 travel lane).} ; {Activity date: 01/03/2020; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - RE: freeway sign review For: (replacement sign, 2nd freeway sign for premise) At: 902 W Irvington / Placita del Rio Permit: T19OT00930 Date: 1/3/20 (3rd review) Reviewer: H. Thrall Codes: Unified Development Code, Sign Standards UDC 7A, Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), National Electric Code (NEC), International Building Code 2018 (IBC) 1) Proposal shows this is a replacement freeway sign for the freeway sign located at the far northwest parcel of the development along I-19 frontage. (sign is within sign area, vertical clearance under the sign, proximity to I-19 right of way) 2) Removal and replacement of the freeway sign requires a Singular Sign Design Option (SSDO) review process to allow two (2) freeway signs at this shopping center premise (existing Texas Roadhouse sign, same premise). Per 7A.10.2.b, one freeway sign is permitted per premise (commercial zone). Contact staff for SDRC applications once the following review comments are addressed. 3) Height: 7A.6.5.B. B. Freeway grade: For freewa |