Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/25/2019 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | VISITED SITE, MET WITH TFD INVESTIGATORS AND TPD OFFICERS. TFD INVESTIGATORS STATED THEY HAD BEEN INIDE BUT IT APPEARED TO BE A CONTENTS FIRE ONLY, THAT THERE WAS NO STRUCTURAL DAMAGE AND NO ELECTRICAL DAMAGE, ONLY SMOKE DAMAGE ON THE CEILING. TFD STATED THAT TPD WAS CALLED BECAUSE THE OCCUPANT ALLEGEDLY HAD STARTED THE SAME ADDRESS ON FIRE TWICE BEFORE. TPD HAD CALLED OUT CRIME SCENE AND THEY WERE STILL WAITING ON THE SEARCH WARRANT. TFD TOOK ME TO THE NORTH WINDOW AND ALLOWED ME TO LOOK INSIDE WHERE I FOUND TWO CHAIRS AND A DRESSER THAT WERE CHARRED. NONE OF THE WALLS WERE FIRE DAMAGED, HOWEVER THE CEILING WAS SMOKE DAMAGED. . ELECTRICAL BOXES WERE SET INTO THE EXTERIOR CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS TFD STATED THE FIRE WAS MORE TO THE N/E CORNER OF THE BDRM, AND NOT NEAR THE FIRE ITSELF. TFD STATED THEY SAW NO ELECTRICAL DAMAGE. THERE WAS NO CEILING LIGHT FIXTURE. I SPOKE TO THE OCCUPANTS IN THE FRONT UNIT TO OBTAIN OWNERS NAME AND CONTACT. THEY ALSO STATED THIS WAS THE THIRD TIME THIS HAS HAPPENED. IT WAS THE SAME INFORMATION I OBTAINED FROM TPD. I WAS NOT ALLOWED TO ENTER THE STRUCTURE. I TOOK MEASUREMENTS OF THE FIRE DAMAGED WINDOW AND INFORMED TFD TO CONTACT ME WHEN CRIME SCENE WAS COMPLETE AND THAT I WOULD CALL BOARD UP TO SECURE THE WINDOW. |