Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Not Ready
Inspection History: COT - ENGR - Signage Final
Permit Number - T18OT00708
Inspection Description - COT - ENGR - Signage Final
Inspection Status - Not Ready
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/27/2022 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | Not Ready | ||
| 07/03/2019 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | Passed | {Activity date: 07/03/2019; Status: Approved; Inspector: hthrall1; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - } ; {Activity date: 07/02/2019; Status: Continued; Inspector: hthrall1; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - 7/2/19 - sign permit resubmittal received. - HT Sent email to change pole covers to 18 x 18 to meet minimum criteria in Notice of Decision, and add height and text to an elevation to complete final view of sign. Sign dimensions on revised plans clarified per cabinetry space, per NOD. Dimensions match the 2011 permit for the voluntary reduction in sign area and height from original configuration built in 1972. Note that the plans originally submitted under the Singular Sign Design Option showed an error on dimensions, and the staff referral to the SDRC review provided clarity to refer to the 2011 configuration prior to voluntary reduction in height and sign area. Awaiting revisions on showing height/ text/pole cover size. (Final appearance of sign)} ; {Activity date: 05/06/2019; Status: Partial Approval; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - RE: follow up notes from 4/23/19 sign permit review For: pole sign restoration -Singular Sign Design Option MSP-18-013 Site: 3251 E Speedway Boulevard / Loft Cinema Reviewer: H. Thrall & E. Newcomb Date: 5/6/19 1) Engineering approved. 2) Revised Special Inspection form approved. Foundation pre-inspection prior to construction, per engineer, R. Schneider. Field welding special inspection, Tom Tiedeman, Western Technologies. 3) On the sign elevation diagram, revise to show pole covers per the SSDO decision notice. 4) On the sign elevation diagram, revise to show the round light bulbs at the top of the sign, note as "existing bulbs to be replaced, shall not animate except as original formation, only in sequential chase/scintillate in a rotational style" 5) Show sign area for each area of the sign, per the SSDO decision. 6) On elevation view - provide all electrical data - volts, amps, circuits, shut off switches, and outdoor lighting code that interior lighting change to LED shall not exceed 4400k color temperature. Send revisions to Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov} ; {Activity date: 04/23/2019; Status: Continued; Inspector: HThrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Pole covers missing off sign diagram, per Director's Decision, as well as lights on top feature. Advised special inspection form required. Contacted engineer.} ; {Activity date: 04/23/2019; Status: Continued; Inspector: HThrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Engineed plans submitted 4/22/19} ; {Activity date: 12/12/2018; Status: Continued; Inspector: HThrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - T18SA00479 / Master Sign Program case MSP-18-013 reviewed by design professional and Director's Notice of Decision approved/issued December 12, 2018 with appeal period through December 26, 2018. Conditions of approval were noted in decision letter and engineered plans required to be submitted for continued permit review.} ; {Activity date: 11/21/2018; Status: Continued; Inspector: HTHRALL; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - CONTRACTOR PROVIDED TWO ADDTIONAL DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW. SDRC REQUEST FOR INCREASED HEIGHT AND SIGN AREA, REDUCED SETBACK AT MINIMUM. REVIEW CONTINUATION OF NEW PLANS WITH ORIGINAL SET.} ; {Activity date: 10/22/2018; Status: Continued; Inspector: hthrall1; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Contractor submitted an application (email/pdf) for a Singular Sign Design Option - again with basic renderings of proposal. No review comments were addressed on plans for construction details or which parts of sign are new/removed nor supports. Insufficient information as of 10/22. Case number reserved in June was MSP-18-013.} ; {Activity date: 10/16/2018; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Email from contractor 10/9, advising the plans are ready for resubmittal. Emailed back when returned to the office 10/15/18, asking for plans resubmitted via email. (Reserved case number for Singular Sign Design Option is MSP-18-013. Desire to maintain reduced setback, increase sign area and height past allowances for a pole sign - from a sign that was subject to a prior article 8 voluntary reduction in height/sign area. Further details for SSDO review under Sign Design Review Committee will be called out upon review of the forthcoming revised plans.)} ; {Activity date: 06/11/2018; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - Met with Zach Breneman of the Loft and then exchanged emails. Sign proposal to reinstall another cabinet and extend height is not historic landmark sign, sign had a voluntary reduction on it in 2001. Sign will need to undergo permit submittal review with details on sign area, height, setback, construction, lighting, new footers likely, etc. Once review identifies all issues versus code, can proceed with Sign Design Review Committee (SDRC) for proposed alterations as a Singular Sign Design Option (SSDO). Provided MSP (master sign program) applications by email to Zach.} ; {Activity date: 08/16/2018; Status: Continued; Inspector: hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - PRECURSORY REVIEW DONE OF REVISED DRAWINGS, AGREED ENGINEERING CAN BE WAIVED UNTIL AFTER REVIEW FOR SINGULAR SIGN DESIGN OPTION (SSDO) THROUGH SIGN DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE (SDRC). CONTRACTOR WAS SENT A LIST OF ITEMS TO PROVIDE FOR REVIEW TO CONTINUE, IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ALL VARIANCES NEEDED. (I.E. CURRENT PHOTO OF EXISTING SIGN, CLEARLY CALL OUT THE PROPOSED SIGN CABINET ON THE ELEVATION VIEW, ADD SIDE VIEW SHOWING IF CABINET WOULD BE THROUGH POLES OR IF A CABINET EACH SIDE OF POLES, POLES AND ATTACHMENTS AND FOOTERS UKNOWN IF POSSIBLE TO KEEP DUE TO INCREASE IN SIGN AREA AND HEIGHT - REQUIRES ENGINEERING EVALUATION. NEED ALL LIGHTS TO BE REMOVED AND LIGHTS TO STAY TO BE SHOWN NEEDS SITE PLAN FRONTAGES, SETBACKS TO CLOSEST LEADING EDGE OF SIGN TO CURB SIGN APPEARS TO BE ABOVE THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE OF 30" -6" CLEARANCE ZONE, DIMENSION THE BOTTOMS AND TOPS OF EACH CABINET TO DEMONSTRATE THE SIGN "HANGS OVER" THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES. DIMENSION LINES ON THE PLAN WITH NOTATIONS AS NEEDED. PICTURES OF THE EXISTING BUILDING AND ALL EXISTING SIGNAGE NEED TO BE PROVIDED. AT MINIMUM, THE ISSUES FOUND BY PRELIMINARY REVIEW: EXCEED SIGN AREA OF POLE SIGN, EXCEED HEIGHT OF POLE SIGN, REDUCED SETBACK FOR POLE SIGN, NO POLE COVERS. OTHER CODE CRITERIA MAY BE FOUND, THUS THE REVIEW OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED IS IMPORTANT. CONTRACTOR PROVIDED WITH APPLICATIONS FOR THE SINGULAR SIGN DESIGN OPTION PROCESS (SSDO), AS WAS ALSO GIVEN TO THE LOFT CINEMA STAFF IN AN EMAIL 6/11/18 (ZACH BRENAMAN).} ; {Activity date: 08/08/2018; Status: Continued; Inspector: hthrall; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - CONTRACTOR SENT IN REVISED DRAWINGS} ; {Activity date: 06/29/2018; Status: Continued; Inspector: Hthrall1; Comment: Entered by HTHRALL1 - RE: SIGN REVIEW FOR: PROPOSED POLE SIGN ALTERATION AT: 3233-3251 E SPEEDWAY BLVD PERMIT: T18OT00708 REVIEWER: H.THRALL DATE: 6/29/18 1) PROPOSAL IS LACKING A SITE PLAN WITH SETBACKS, SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES, SIGN LOCATION VIEW WITH FRONTAGES NOTED ON ALL STREETS AHD RELATIONSHIP TO PARKING, ETC. PROVIDE DATA TO ADDRESS SUCH ISSUES. 2) UNDERSTOOD ENGINEERING FOR PROPOSAL WOULD BE PROVIDED IF A SINGULAR SIGN DESIGN OPTION IS APPROVED THROUGH THE SIGN DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE (SDRC) PROCESS. 3) SIGN PROPOSAL IS TO INCREASE SIGN HEIGHT TO 30' PER APPLICATION, AND ADD A MANUAL TRACKER CABINET ONTO THE SIGN STRUCTURE FOR A TOTAL SIGN AREA OF 363 SQUARE FEET. THE PROPOSED CABINET AREA IS NOT DEFINED. PROVIDE ELEVATION VIEW OF EACH CABINET SPACE DIMENSIONED FOR VERIFICATION, INCLUDE EXISTING CABINET |
|
| 11/19/2019 | COT - ENGR - Signage Final | BBENEDON | Partial Approval | Entered by DMERANZ1 - APPROVED BY INSPECTOR, CLOSURE PENDING SUBMITTAL OF SPECIAL INSPECTION CERTIFICATES. |