Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Inspection History Details

Case: T18DV02633

Parcel: 124061760


Addresses:

1115 E 10TH ST


Inspection Status: Approved

Inspection History: INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE

Case Number - T18DV02633

Inspection Description - INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE

Inspection Status - Approved

Date Description Inspector Results Comments
07/06/2018 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved RECEIVED CALL FROM OWNER THAT THE ZONING PORTION TO ADDRESS THE THREE UNITS WAS COMPLETED BY RUSSLYN WELLS UNDER PERMIT T18SA00254. OWNERS ISSUE TO PROVIDE MAILBOXES MUST NOW BE COMPLETED BY US MAIL. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE.
05/24/2018 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved CONTACTED OWNER BARBARA MARSHALL AND INFORMED HER THAT SHE WOULD NEED TO GET WITH THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FIRST, AND THEN PIMA COUNTY FOR ADDRESSING THAT SITE NEEDS TO BE APPROVED BY ZONING, THE REASON IS SO THAT EACH UNIT CAN RECEIVE MAIL IN INDIVIDUAL MAIL BOXES. MRS MARSHALL HAS ALSO CONTACTED POST OFFICE TO INQUIRE ABOUT A COMMUNITY BOX NEXT DOOR WITH SPACES NOT BEING USED. POST OFFICE ALSO INFORMED HER SHE WOULD NEED TO GO THRU ADDRESSING. MRS MARSHALL WAS GIVEN CONTACT INFO FOR RUSSLYN WELL AND PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING AND IS IN THE ADDRESSING PROCESS.
MRS MARSHALL INFORMED ME AGAIN THAT SHE HAD ISSUED A 5 DAY NOTICE OF EVICTION A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO, WAS HESITANT TO FOLLOW THRU BUT HAS NOW GOTTEN HER LAWYER INVOLVED AND RECEIVED A HEARING DATE FOR NEXT WEEK 5/30 OR 5/31
05/22/2018 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE WARD OFFICE ON FRIDAY 5/18, AFTER THEY WERE CONTACTED BY THE OCCUPANT MELISSA JEFFREYS. S/W GAS WAS OUT AND CONDUCTED A INSPECTION AND ZONING ADMINSITRATOR RUSSLYN WELLS CONTACTED AS WELL BY THE OCCUPANT. BECAUSE OF THE ADDED CONCERNS OF THE STRUCTURES CODE ENFORCEMENT CONTACTED ZONING ADMINISTRATOR RUSSLYN WELLS AND FOUND OUT WHAT SHE NEEDED TO KNOW. C/E CONTACTED THE OWNER ASKING IF SHE COULD MAKE ARRANGEMENTS TO GET INSIDE THE REAR UNIT #3 AND THE ROOM IN THE BACK OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE. A REINSPECTION WAS SET UP, MY FINDINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
>tHE GAS ISSUE BROUGHT UP BY THE WARD OFFICE WAS ADDRESSED IMMEDIATELY. TWO MINOR LEAKS IN A WALL HEATER WERE FOUND, HEATER WAS CAPPED, GAS TURNED OFF AND A NEW HEATER WILL BE ADDRESS BY THE OWNER, SHE IS ALREADY CONSIDERING ELECTRIC BASEBOARD HEATERS.
>MET WITH BECKY IBARRA WHO CHECKED AERIAL VIEWS OF THE PROPERTY AND SHOWED NO CHANGES OR ADDED STRUCTURES TO THE PROPERTY SINCE 1940 OR WHEN THE STRUCTURES WERE BUILT ORIGINALLY.
>UNIT #3 THE GUEST HOUSE BUILT WITH THE ORIGINAL STRUCTURE IN APPROX 1940 DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE CHANGED AND DID HAVE A KITCHEN AS ORIGINAL OWNERS LIVED IN THE GUEST HOUSE ANE RENTED OUT THE MAIN HOUSE. FOLLOW UP INSPECTION CONFIRMED THAT NOTHING HAS CHANGED SINCE 1970.
>SPOKE WITH ARMANDO QUIROZ, DSD INSPECTOR SUPERVISOR WHO STATED KITCHENS AND BATHROOMS WERE ALLOWED IN GUEST HOUSES UP UNTIL 1970 WHEN THE NEW CODE CHANGE DID NOT ALLOW FULL KITCHENS IN THE GUEST HOUSE. THIS GUEST HOUSE AGAIN BUILT IN 1940 AND WOULD BE CONSIDERED GRANDFATHERED INCLUDING THE GAS LINE RUN FROM THE MAIN STRUCTURE.
>SPEAKING WITH RUSSLYN WELLS STATES SHE IS NO LONGER CONCERNED AT THIS POINT WITH MAIN STRUCTURE BUILDING #1 AND THE GUEST HOUSE, BUILDING #3. RUSSLYN WAS CONCERNED WITH #2 AND STATED THERE WOULD NEED TO BE A FIRE WALL BETWEEN #1 AND #2 IF 2 HAD A KITCHEN WHICH IT DOES. THE WALL BETWEEN 1 AND 2 IS A PLASTER LATHE WALL BOTH SIDES. THERE IS A SOLID WOOD DOOR LEFT IN THE WALL BUT SEALED SO THAT IT IS NOT USED AND A 2ND WALL WAS BUILT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE WALL OR IN UNIT #2CLOSING OFF THE DOOR WAY OPENING. THE PLASTER WALL AND THE SOLID WOOD DOOR WOULD BE CONSIDERED A I HOUR RATED FIRE WALL. THIS ELIMINATED ANY CONCERNS WITH ZONING ADMINISTRATOR RUSSLYN WELLS. ARMANDO QUIROZ STATED WE HAVE NO RECORDS OF HOW THE HOUSE WAS BUILT AND NKNOW ONLY IT WAS PART OF THE ORIGINAL STRUCTURE. I FOUND NO OTHER IMMINNENT HAZARDS, OWNERS HAVE PROVIDED SMOKE DETECTORS IN ALL UNITS, AND DURING MY FOLLOW UP INSPECTION FOUND PAINTED SHUT WINDOWS HAVE ALREADY BEEN ABATED AND WINDOWS NOW ABLE TO BE OPENED.
>THE LAST ISSUE WITH THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WAS THE ADDRESSING, AND UNITS NEEDING TO BE PROPERLY ADDRESSED. I MET WITH PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING AND ASKED WHAT NEEDED TO TAKE PLACE. PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING STATED AS LONG AS ZONING GIVES THEM THE OK THEN THEY CAN CHANGE THE ADDRESSING ON THE UNITS AND WILL TAKE CARE OF ANY FIRE ISSUES, MAIL ISSUES, AND ANY OTHER ISSUES THAT FALL UNDER UNIT IDENTIFICATION. OWNERS WERE ALREADY AWARE OF THE MAILBOX ISSUE AND ARE LOOKING INTO A MAIL BOX TO ALLOW MAIL TO GO TO EACH UNIT PROPERLY. C/E WILL INFORM OWNERS OF THE ADRESSING CHANGE REQUIRED BY PIMA COUNTY AND WHAT STEPS NEED TO BE TAKEN BY THE OWNER.
05/22/2018 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved RECEIVED A CALL FROM TFD GLENN D'AURIA, ASKING WHAT I HAD FOUND ON THE PROPERTY OUR DISCUSSION INCLUDED
>MEETING WITH THE OWNER AND ENTERING ALL 3 UNITS
>PROVIDING INFORMATION TO ZONING
>QUESTIONING DSD INSPECTION SUPERVISOR, WHO IN TURN PROVIDED ANSWERS TO HELP WITH THE PARTING WALL BETWEEN UNITS 1 + 2
> SPOKE ABOUT C/E JURISDICTION ON PROPERTY BUILT IN 1939 AND NO CHANGES TO THE FOOT PRINT OF THE PROPERTY.
>SPOKE ABOUT FIRE ISSUES
>SPOKE ABOUT EXITING ISSUES, WINDOWS IN PARTICULAR, ISSUES WERE ABATED.
>SPOKE WITH OWNER ABOUT HOUSE AND HOW THE HOUSE HAS BEEN USED IN THE PAST.
>SPOKE ABOUT S/W GAS ISSUES, THEY WERE ABATED.
>LASTLY SPOKE ABOUT ADDRESSING ISSUES. THEY ARE BEING ADDRESSED BY OWNERS
GLENN DAURIA STATED THE TFD HAS NO ISSUES WITH THE STRUCTURES PARTING WALL. BOTH HE AND I AGREED THAT THE ORIGINAL WALL IS A PLASTER LATHE WALL, 1/2 " OF LATE ON BOTH SIDES AND 1/2' TO A INCH OF PLASTER ON EITHER SIDE. I EXLAINED TO GLENN THAT ARMANDO QUIROZ STATED THAT IN REALTY WE CANNOT SEE INSIDE THE WALL BEYOND THE PLASTER . GLENN AGREED THAT THERE IS A MINIMUM 1 HR RATING IF NOT 1 1/2 HR RATING FOR THE PARTING WALLS.
05/14/2018 INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE Approved REVISITED SITE WITH ANGEL VINDIOLA, MET WITH OCCUPANT MELISSA JEFFREYS WHO EXPLAINED SHE HAD LIVED THERE SINCE OCT 2017, A ONE YR LEASE. STATED TFD HAD BEEN OUT TWICE FOR THE "UNIT" BEHIND HER FOR SMOKE DETECTORS GOING OFF. IN THE FRONT UNIT WHERE MELISSA LIVES SHE STATED THE UNIT WAS A DUPLEX, IT IS NOT AND NEVER BEEN REGISTERED THAT WAY, THE SECOND "UNIT" OR ROOM HAS IT'S OWN ENTRY AND TWO WINDOWS THAT CAN BE USED FOR EXITS, HOWEVER WE WERE NOT ABLE TO GET IN THE SECOND "UNIT". THE OTHER ISSUE WAS WINDOWS NOT BEING ABLE TO OPEN. I EXPLAINED TO OCCUPANT THAT THERE NEEDED TO BE TWO EXITS, DOOR & WINDOW AWAY FROM THE DOOR. ANGEL VIINDIOLA STATED THAT THE OWNER WOULD BE ALLOWED TO HAVE THE TWO STRUCTURES, HOUSE AND REAR STRUCTURE AND THAT EACH STRUCTURE ALLOWED 4 OCCUPANTS EACH OR 8 OCCUPANTS NON RELATED. OWNER PRESENTLY HAS TWO STRUCTURES, 3 OCCUPANTS, UNDER THE ALLOWABLE 8 OCCUPANTS. THE NEXT ISSUE WAS A SMELL IN THE KITCHEN, FIRST RESPONSE WAS GAS, TENNANT DOES NOT HAVE GAS ON AND DOES NOT BELIEVE IT IS A GAS ISSUE, BUT NOT SURE OF THE NATURE OF THE SMELL. THE FAN ISSUE MISSING IN THE BATHROOM WILL BE REMEDIED WHEN THE WINDOW IS MADE OPERABLE. INSPECTION DID FIND UNIT TO BE VERY CLEAN.