Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO.
If you cannot find what you are looking for please
submit a records request.
Inspection Status: Passed
Inspection History: COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up
| Date |
Description |
Inspector |
Results |
Comments |
| 05/29/2018 |
COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up |
GONZALEZ |
Approved |
Entered by GONZALEZ - CONTINUANCE HAS BEEN GRANTED HEARING SET FOR 7/12/2018 AT 3PM. |
| 04/10/2018 |
COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up |
BIGMAN |
Approved |
Entered by BIGMAN - THE PARTIES AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOW IN COMPLIANCE EXCEPT FOR THE ALLEY ABUTTING THE PROPERTY. MS JOHNSON EXPLAINS THAT HER LANDLORD TOLD HER THAT THE ALLEY WOULD BE THE LANDLORDS RESPONSIBILTY NOT MS JOHNSON'S. HOWEVER, MS JOHNSON IS ALSO LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE AND IS THE PARTY THAT WAS SERVED BY THE CITY. EXHIBIT 1 ADMITTED. THE COURT DOE3S NOT AS YET HAVE THE LANDLORD AS PART TO THIS CASE, BUT DOES NOTE THAT BOTH THE TENANT AND THE LANDLORD ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TUCSON CITY CODES.IF THE LANDLORD DOES NOT TAKE CARE OF THE ISSUES IN THE ALLEY, THE COURT WILL HOLD MS JOHGNSON LIABLE AND IMPOSE ADDITIONAL FINES. THE COURT WILL ALSO ENTER AN ORDER ALLOWING THE CITY TO ABTE THE VIOLATIONS AND ORDER MS JOHNSON TO REIMBURESE THE CITY FOR THE COST OF ABATEMENT. THE CITY MAY CHOOSE TO FILE A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE LANDLORD ALSO ASKING FOR ADDITIONAL FINES AND ORDER TO ABATE . |
| 02/08/2018 |
COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up |
BIGMAN |
Approved |
Entered by BIGMAN - COURT FINDS RESPONDENT RESPONSIBLE. A COMPLIANCE HEARING IS SET ON 4/10/18 @ 10 AM. FINE $459 CAN BE SUSPENDED AFTER REVIEW OF COMPLIANCE. |
| 11/21/2017 |
COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Follow Up |
BIGMAN |
Approved |
Entered by BIGMAN - TRUCK STILL IN STREET, WEEDS STILL ON LOT, REFUSE STILL ABUTTING LOT. |