Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case: T17DV02689

Parcel: 116261020


Addresses:

2526 W CALLE MORADO

Inspection Status: Approved

Inspection History: INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT

Date Description Inspector Results Comments
06/27/2017 INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT Approved VISITED SITE, MET WITH HOMEOWNER WHO INFORMED ME THAT TREETS/ PARKING DIVISION WAS THE DEPARTMENT THAT GAVE HIM THE CODE SEC 20-277, #7 THAT STATES THERE IS NO PARKING ALLOWED WITHIN 5 FT OF A DRIVEWAY. THIS PROPERTY AND THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY TO THE EAST HAVE DRIVEWAYS 11 FT APART WITH THE MAILBOX DIRECTLY IN THE CENTER. THE SIGN WAS ANCHORED TO THE MAILBOX.
I TOOK A PICTURE OF THE SIGN/ MAILBOX DROVE OVER TO THE SIGN DEPT ANDSPOKE WITH BOTH BRIAN WIESE AND HEATHER THRALL, WE LOOKED UP AN DVERIFIED THE TUCSON CODE WHICH WAS STATED PROPERLY ON THE SIGN. HEATHER STATED IT WAS BASICALLY THE SAME AS A "NO TRESPASSING" SIGN THAT ALLOWS TPD TO TAKE ACTION AND A PERSON SHOULD NOT BE PARKING IN FRONT OF THE MAILBOX. BRIAN ALSO INFORMED ME THAT THE CITY HAS NO JURISDICTION ON ANYTHING THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE MAILBOX AS IT THEN BECOMES A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ISSUE. HEATHER STATED IF EVER A ISSUE THE OWNER CAN PUT THE SIGN IN THE FRONT YARD AREA AND THE SIGN CAN BE 2 FT BY 2 FT. SIGN DEPT HAS NO ISSUES WITH THE SIGN AND THE CITY HAS NO JURISDICTION. NO VIOLATION. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE.