Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
Case Number - T17DV01442
Inspection Description - INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
Inspection Status - Approved
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/17/2017 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | REVISITED SITE WITH MARTIN ROMERO, POSTED "DO NOT ENTER" PLACARDS AND NOV FOR LACK OF C/O. NOV ASKED THEY CEASE OPERATIONS IMMEDIATELY, AND THAT THE STRUCTURE REMAINS VACANT. | |
| 04/10/2017 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | GLENN D'AURIA AND I MET WITH CLAYTON TO GO OVER FINDINGS, DISCUSSED DISCREPENSIES AND WHAT WE FOUND. CLAYTON DETERMINED THERE WAS ENOUGH TO SHUT THE LOUNGE DOWN AND STATED HE WOULD GET A "ORDER TO COMPLY" LETTER DRAWN UP FOR THE ISSUES HE SEES AS PROPBLEMS, MAINLY NO C/O, OR TEMP C/O | |
| 04/07/2017 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | VISITED SITE, MET WITH GLENN D'AURIA OF TFD, SGT SCOTT OF TPD AND FOUR OTHER OFFICERS. VISITED THE SITE AS A INSPECTION TEAM. > INSPECTED THE REAR OF THE UNIT. FOUND THE REAR TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER PLAN. EAR STORAGE ROOM AND OFFICE BEING USED AS A OFFICE. >REAR BATHROOMS ALSO CONSTRUCTED PER PLAN , REAR EXIT DOOR AND AND HALL WAY HAD PROPER EXIT SIGNAGE AND DOORS HAD PROPER CLOSERS. >THE FUTURE USE ROOM HAD BEEN CONSTRUCTED, IT WAS NOT TO PLAN AND PROBABLY NOT INSPECTED. I BELIEVE THE REAR OF STRUCTURE WAS COMPLETED AND INSPECTED AND PASSED ALL INSPECTIONS. FUTURE USE ROOM WAS BEING USED FOR "STORAGE". I FOUND A TV AND DESK USED TO MONITOR THE SAFETY CAMERAS, A L SHAPED SOFA AREA, A BED IN THE S/W CORNER OF THE ROOM AND HOOKAH STUFF PLACED ALL AROUND THE ROOM. NOT REALLY A STORAGE ROOM. >THE FRONT ROOM DID NOT HAVE TABLES AND CHAIRS PLACED AS SHOW ON THE FLOOR PLAN. ALL COUCHES WERE PLACED ALONG THE OUTSIDE WALL AREAS, THERE WAS A DJ AREA WITH MUSIC EQUIPMENT SET UP AND ALTHOUGH THERE WAS NO DANCING AT THE TIME, THE SET UP WOULD ALLOW FOR DANCING. OWNERS PROVIDED A OCCUPANCY SIGN FOR 150 PEOPLE, TFD &TPD HAD A VERBAL OCCUPANCY OF 49, THEY COUNTED LESS THAN 50 PEOPLE IN THE LOUNGE, I COUNTED MORE THAN 50 PEOPLE. PERMITS SHOWED ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS AND NO C/O. UNSURE WHEN THE FUTURE USE ROOM WAS BUILT AND WHETHER IT WAS PERMITED. BECAUSE OF THE ALLOWED USE AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, TPD REQUIRED OWNERS TO REMOVE PAAPER IN THE WINDOWS (BOTTOM HALF ONLY) SO THAT TPD COULD SEE INSIDE THE STRUCTURE. NO CITATIONS WERE ISSUED DUE TO THE DISCREPENCIES IN PLANS, PERMITS AND OCCUPANCY. INFORMED RICK SALDATE AND MARTIN ROMERO OF MY FINDINGS. |