Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
Case Number - T16DV00577
Inspection Description - INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
Inspection Status - Approved
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/06/2016 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | REVISITED SITE, HAD INSPECTED FOR THE SAME REASONS AT THE END OF 2014 AND HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY COMPLAINTS SINCE THEN. OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY HAD ORIGINALLY CUT DOWN TWO LARGE PINE TREES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE FRONT OR WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. THE PROBLEM ORIGINALLY WAS THAT THE DEAD PORTIONS OF THE TREES WERE OVERHANGING THE SIDEWALK AND STREET AREA. TWO OF FOUR TREES WERE CUT DOWN COMPLETELY AND TWO EUCALYPTUS TREES WERE CUT WAY BACK BUT DUE TO COST WERE LEFT TALL. MY INSPECTION TODAY FOUND 6 FT CUT OFF ONE OF THE TREES AND 8 FT CUT OFF THE SECOND TREE. PICTURES WERE SENT TO RICK SALDATE OF THE TREES AND COMPLAINTANT STATED TREES WERE VERY ROTTEN AND WOULD FALL OVER. TREE STUMPS REMAIN 12 TO 14 FT IN HEIGHT, ARE NOT ROTTEN, AND I DO NOT SEE THEM FALLING DUE TO BEING ROTTED. I DID SPEAK WITH THE MANAGER WHO STATED THEY DO PLAN TO CONTINUE TAKING THE STUMPS DOWN IN HEIGHT OVER TIME. I SPOKE WITH RICK SALDATE AND SHOWED HIM PICTURES OF THE STUMPS AND THE AMOUNT OF TREE REMOVED OVER TIME AND THE AMOUNT TAKEN DOWN RECENTLY, |