Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: SIGN SITE REVIEW
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/26/2015 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Approved | ||
| 08/24/2015 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Compliance | VERIFY SIGNS TO BE REMOVED. | |
| 07/31/2015 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Denied | REVIEW COMMENTS FOR: T15OT00916 AT: 2090 - 2096 N KOLB RD., KOLB OFFICE PARK GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (3-77) FREESTANDING SIGN PROPOSAL (3-77.C.5) REVIEWED: 7/30/15 H.THRALL/B.WIESE 1) SITE PLAN PROVIDED SHOWS SOUTHERN LOT LINE IN MIDDLE OF A COMMON DRIVEWAY. APPEARS HIGHLIGHTED PROPERTY LINE IS NOT SHOWING THE FULL PREMISE, AND IS NOT CORRECTLY CALLED OUT TO EAST SIDE OF SITE (PLACED RIGHT BEHIND PARKING SPACES). PROVIDE SITE PLAN FOR REMAINDER OF DEVELOPMENT, ADDRESS IS 1970 N. KOLB. RE-EXAMINE PROPERTY LINE LOCATIONS AND HIGHLIGHT APPROPRIATELY. 2) NO FRONTAGE DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. PROVIDE FOR FREESTANDING SIGN CALCULATIONS UNDER 3-77.C.5 3) NO PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE SHOWN FOR THIS SITE PLAN. PROVIDE PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR FULL DEVELOPMENT PER 3-77. C.5. TO EVALUATE PREMISE TYPE. 4) IDENTIFY PREMISE TYPE ONCE COMPLETE PLAN AND COMPLETE PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE CALLED OUT, PER SIGN CODE ADMINISTRATOR. 5) PROVIDE PHOTOGRAPHIC INVENTORY OF EXISTING FREESTANDING SIGNS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND SHOW THEIR LOCATIONS ON SITE PLAN(S). THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO EVALUATE TOTAL FREESTANDING SIGN ALLOWANCE BASED UPON PREMISE TYPE, 3-77 C.5. CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH SIGN NOTED ON APPLICATION IS TO BE REMOVED. 6) THIS REVIEW IS NOT COMPLETED, AS THE SITE PLAN INFORMATION REQUIRED WILL SHOW WHETHER THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF SIGNS IS PERMITTED. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED AS A COURTESY TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR A SUFFICIENT RESUBMITTAL. 7) PROVIDE SETBACK FROM LEADING EDGE OF DRIVEWAY CURB PER U.D.C. 7.4.6.F.2.b (MUST BE 2' MINIMUM TO ALLOW FOR SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE FOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC) 8) PROVIDE SETBACK FROM PARKING SPACE PER U.D.C. 7.4.6.D.2.b (MUST BE 18" MINIMUM) 9) SIGN A-1, NOTED WITHIN CURRENTLY LANDSCAPED AREA WITH SCREEN WALL AND PLANTS. REQUIRES REVIEW FROM LANDSCAPE DIVISION FOR ADVISEMENT ON VEGETATION/SCREEN REQUIREMENTS. 10) PER 3-33 - AND SIGN CODE ADMINISTRATOR ADVISEMENT DATED 8/26/13 REGARDING SAFETY/CONSISTENCY - SIGNS WITHIN 20' OF ROADWAY - MEASURE HEIGHT FROM TOP OF STREET CURB. SHOW ON DIAGRAM HEIGHT AT BASE OF SIGN TO TOP OF CABINET AND HEIGHT FROM TOP OF CURB TO TOP OF CABINET, WHICH WILL DEMONSTRATE ANY SLOPE ON SITE. 11) SIGN AREA OF CABINET IS TO BE TAKEN IN BOX FORM PER 3-32. RE-EVALUATE AND RE-MEASURE. SIGN APPLICATION SHOWS 48 SQFT SIGN AREA, DRAWING SHOWS 42.56 - BUT WITH BOXING THE SIGN IT MAY EXCEED 50 SQUARE FEET, WHICH WOULD EXCEED ALLOWANCE FOR A MONUMENT SIGN. REVISE. 12) DIAGRAM PROVIDED FOR "MONUMENT SIGNAGE" INDICATES "DOUBLE FACED TENANT MONUMENT", WHEN APPLICATION LISTS 1 SINGLE FACED- AND 1 DOUBLE-FACED MONUMENT. SHOW THE BACK OF THE SINGLE-FACED MONUMENT CABINET. 13) ENGINEERING IS EXPIRED AS OF 2014. PROVIDE CURRENT ENGINEERING CALCS. 14) ENGINEERING PACKET PROVIDED LISTS SIGN AREA AT 70 SQFT. THIS IS CAN BE MIS-INTERPRETED. THE SIGN STRUCTURE AREA IS THE DIMENSIONS NEEDED FOR CALCULATING ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SIZE/DEPTH OF FOOTER. SIGN AREA IS THE AREA OF THE CABINET WHERE THE MESSAGE IS CONTAINED. PER E. NEWCOMB, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING REVIEWER, PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF FULL EXTENT OF SIGN STRUCTURE. 15) SIGN FOOTER ON DIAGRAM IS SOWN AT 2 X 8, BUT IN YOUR SUPPLIED ENGINEERING, IT APPEARS IT IS 2.5 X 7. WHEN YOU RESUBMIT, DOUBLE CHECK YOUR ENGINEERING MATCHES DRAWINGS YOU PROVIDE. 16) SUPPLIED ENGINEERING IS SO SMALL AND SO LIGHT IT IS NOT LEGIBLE. PROVIDE LEGIBLE INFORMATION FOR PERMIT RECORD AND INSPECTIONS. 17) NO CONSTRUCTION NOTATIONS OR DIAGRAMS ARE PROVIDED TO EXPLAIN HOW THE CABINET AND POLE COVER ARE CONNECTED TO EACHOTHER NOR TO THE STEEL PIPE. . IS IT WELDED? IF WELDED, SPECIFY IF ON SITE OR FIELD. NOTE FIELD WELD REQUIRES SPECIAL INSPECTION. 18) FURTHER COMMENTS MAY BE FORTHCOMING, DEPENDING UPON RESPONSES PROVIDED. |
|
| 07/23/2015 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Continued | Meeting pending with Sign Code Staff on 7/29 regarding submittal requirements |