Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO.
If you cannot find what you are looking for please
submit a records request.
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
| Date |
Description |
Inspector |
Results |
Comments |
| 08/12/2015 |
INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT |
|
Approved |
VISITED THE SITE, FOUND WEST CHAINLINK FENCE PROPERLY SECURED AND MENDED USING TWO FENCE PANELS FROM BIFF BAKER. THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE WAS LINED BY THE BLOCK COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO THE SOUTH OR NEXT DOOR AND THEREFORE PROPERTY CANNOT BE ENTERED FROM THE SOUTH. ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WAS A CHINLINK FENCE ALSO MENDED WITH A FENCE PANEL FROM BIFF BAKER AND THE FENCE PANEL WAS OPENED AT THE NORTH END KIND OF BEING USED FOR A GATE WHICH DOES NOT MATTER BECAUSE THE DIVIDING FENCE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, HALF CHAIN LINK AND THE OTHER HALF GALVANIZED METAL BLEW DOWN. THE GALVANIZED METAL PORTION OF FENCE IS STACKED ON THE NEIGHBORS PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND NOW ANYBODY CAN WALK ONTO THE PROPERTY (914 N 13TH) FROM THE NORTH SIDE. A BOARD WAS REMOVED FROM THE WINDOW OF THE MOBILE HOME BUT I RE BOARDED THE WINDOW USING THE EXISTING BOARD THAT WAS REMOVED. I CHECKED ALL STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY AND ALL OTHER STRUCTURES REMAINED SECURED, AND POSTED WITH NO TRESPASSING SIGNS. BECAUSE THE FENCE IS DOWN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY I FEEL THAT THE FENCE PANELS BEING USED ARE NO LONGER NEEDED AND CAN BE REMOVED. I SPOKE TO MARTIN ROMERO EXPLAINED THE FENCING SITUATION, METIONED THE TRAILER WINDOW WAS RESECURED AND THAT ALL STRUCTURES REMAINED SECURED AND POSTED AND THAT FENCE PANELS WERE NO LONGER REQUIRED. MARTIN STATED HE WOULD CONTACT BIFF BAKER TO REMOVE THE PANELS. |