Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit: T14OT01222

Parcel: 12106008A


Addresses:

5561 E SPEEDWAY BL

Inspection Status: Approved

Inspection History: SIGN SITE REVIEW

Date Description Inspector Results Comments
10/22/2014 SIGN SITE REVIEW Approved TOTAL $225.48
10/06/2014 SIGN SITE REVIEW Correction Required Sec. 3-53. Prohibited signs.

Roof signs: Signs that are erected upon, against, or directly above a roof, or on top of or directly above the parapet of a building or structure.

Signs indicated on gas canopy appear to extend above roof line of structure. Revise as necessary to comply with sign code requirements

Sec. 3-96. Signs for legal nonconforming uses.

The double faced pole sign indicated on application is considered a non-conforming sign because of the type, height & set-back of sign.

The following applies:

A. Subject to the provisions of this section, signs for a legal nonconforming use, as defined in the Land Use Code, are allowed. Such signs shall be allowed only so long as the nonconforming use is allowed. A final determination by the zoning administrator that a nonconforming use has been discontinued or abandoned shall also be the final determination of the nonconforming status of the related sign.

B. Any such sign legally existing on the effective date of this sign code but that does not comply with the regulations of this sign code adopted after the sign was legally permitted shall be deemed to be a nonconforming sign and shall be subject to the provisions of this article.

C. Except for reasonable repairs and alterations, no nonconforming sign shall be moved, altered, removed and reinstalled, or replaced, unless it is brought into compliance with the requirements of this Sign Code.

The addition of EMC panel would be considered an alteration of existing non-conforming sign and would not be according this section of the Sign Code.

The shell bar components are not considered signage. However, additional review is required for all exposed illuminated components per City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/dsd/Codes-Ordinances/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf
Application has been submitted to City of Tucson Electrical Representative Lee Ray Hanly for review and possible comments.