City of Tucson

Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit: T14OT00834

Parcel: 137070290

Addresses:

5135 S 12TH AV

Inspection Status: Approved

Inspection History: SIGN SITE REVIEW

Date	Description	Inspector	Results	Comments
08/04/2014	SIGN SITE REVIEW		Approved
07/17/2014	SIGN SITE REVIEW		Correction Required	Additional review is required for all exposed illuminated signs (Neon) per 2012 City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/dsd/Codes-Ordinances/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf Application has been submitted to City of Tucson Electrical Review Representative Lee Ray Hanly The following comments apply: 501.3 Internal illumination of signs. The requirements of this paragraph apply to totally enclosed and unenclosed signs where the lamp is not directly visible from any viewing angle. A lamp concealed behind opaque or translucent material is considered not directly visible. 501.4 Exposed Lamps. Lamps not concealed from view by opaque or translucent material shall be considered outdoor lighting and shall conform to the lamp source, shielding requirements, color temperature, and lumen caps of Chapter 4. Specify if plexi glass shielding is transparent, translucent to continue electrical review
07/11/2014	SIGN SITE REVIEW		Correction Required	Permit T14OT00834 Reviewer: Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov For: (3) illum wall signs Site: 5135 S 12th Ave, King Smoke Shop REVIEW OF REVISIONS: JULY 11, 2014 ** REVISIONS CAN BE EMAILED TO THE REVIEWER The following codes apply to this review: THE FOLLOWING CODES APPLY TO THIS REVIEW: OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE (OLC), UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC), SIGN CODE (SC), NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC) 1) Understood if the frontage is 22, the proposed amount of sign area is within code. 2) (REPEAT COMMENT) Per OLC. 403.5 Outdoor Lighting Controls. 403.5.1 The means of controlling the specific "off" curfew shall be by a 24 hour timing device that includes stand-by power to maintain the time and program for a minimum of 6 hours. PROVIDE NOTATION TIMER WILL BE PROVIDED** (pic is not labeled, it may be a timer?) 3) (REPEAT COMMENT) Per SC 3-18, The revision shows one electrical diagram now, but does not indicate if this diagram is to be used for both the channel letters and the cabinet. Clarify what sign(s) this diagram serves. 4) PER LEERAY HANLY: Clarify to what electrical panel. Clarify what loads (gauge of wire)? Clarify if new or existing circuit. 5) Further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon responses provided.
07/02/2014	SIGN SITE REVIEW		Correction Required	Permit T14OT00834 Reviewer: Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov Date: July 2, 2014 For: (3) illum wall signs Site: 5135 S 12th Ave, King Smoke Shop ** REVISIONS CAN BE EMAILED TO THE REVIEWER The following codes apply to this review: THE FOLLOWING CODES APPLY TO THIS REVIEW: OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE (OLC), UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC), SIGN CODE (SC), NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC) 1) Understood if the frontage is 22, the proposed amount of sign area is within code. 2) Per OLC. 403.5 Outdoor Lighting Controls. 403.5.1 The means of controlling the specific "off" curfew shall be by a 24 hour timing device that includes stand-by power to maintain the time and program for a minimum of 6 hours. PROVIDE NOTATION TIMER WILL BE PROVIDED** 3) Per SC 3-18, Two electrical diagrams are submitted for "channel letters" - one has a raceway and the other does not. Provide indicators on your electrical diagrams as to which signs they are designed for (A, B). 4) Per SC 3-18, provide electrical diagram for the cabinet sign ("smoke shop"). 5) Per SC 3-18, provide the height to the top of each sign on the plans. 6) Per PDSD scanning / records - enlarge all print on the plans to 12 point type minimum, there are several notes on the plans that are not legible and cannot be reviewed nor scanned. 7) Per SC 3-18, indicate which elevation is shown on the proposed elevation view. 8) Location map does not indicate where the sign is going - it points to the middle of S 12 th Avenue. Revise. 9) Further review comments may be forthcoming.