Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: SIGN SITE REVIEW
Permit Number - T13OT01321
Inspection Description - SIGN SITE REVIEW
Inspection Status - Approved
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/12/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Approved | HISTORIC APPROVED PROPOSAL FOR ONLY BLACK RAISED LETTERING, NO COLORED BACKGROUND. HISTORIC LETTER WILL ALLOW PERMIT TO BE RELEASED AFTER 12/15/13. RETURN TO SIGN COUNTER WITH 3 SETS OF PLANS FOR CHECKING, TAKE APPROVED PLANS TO HISTORIC ON 2ND FLOOR FOR APPROVAL STAMP AND RETURN BACK TO THE SIGNS COUNTER FOR FINAL APPROVAL AND PERMIT ISSUANCE. | |
| 12/02/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Partial Approval | CITY OF TUCSON OWNED - REQUIRED LETTER OF PERMISSION RECEIVED FROM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY ON BEHALF OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEPT OF REAL ESTATE (JENNA SNYDER OF CHAPMAN MANAGEMENT GROUP) EMAILED STAFF TO NOTE APPROVAL OF EITHER OF THE TWO SIGNAGE OPTIONS PROPOSED BY D.S.A. VACATIONS (BLACK METAL SIGNS - ONE OPTION WITH A YELLOW BACKGROUND TO THE LOGO). HISTORIC REVIEW REFERRAL MADE 11/27. |
|
| 11/27/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Partial Approval | REVISIONS SUBMITTED 11/27/13 MEETS SIGN CODE. REQUIRES HISTORIC BOARD APPROVAL FOR INSTALLATION OF SIGNAGE ON HISTORIC TRAIN DEPOT IN DOWNTOWN TUCSON. CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE IS PAUL JAMISON FROM FAST SIGNS. HE IS ALLOWED TO PROCEED WITH THE HISTORIC APPLICATION FOR FULL REVIEW WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LANDLORD MUST GIVE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE OPTIONS PRIOR TO THE HISTORIC BOARD HEARING. SHOULD THE LANDLORD APPROVAL LETTER NOT BE RECEIVED BY THE HEARING DATE, STAFF WILL RECOMMEND THE HEARING BE VACATED OR POSTPONED. | |
| 11/25/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Correction Required | REVISION SENT IN BY EMAIL 11/18 On your location map - add arrow that shows exactly where the signage is going. On permit application, two signs listed - yet in the drawings it is shown as one sign. Revise drawings to label each sign to correspond to application - Sign A with Total square foot of that sign, then Sign B and total square foot of that sign - keep the overall sign area total listed as well. On mounting detail - provide note that indicates same mounting for both sign A and Sign B - do it for both "options" drawings. Label drawings as "option 1 without yellow background in logo" and "option 2 with yellow background in logo" so it's clear these are not two sets of the same signs, but that there's a difference with the logo background (note, none of the color is saved upon scanning later, hence all the labeling). Please provide the letter from property management indicating they approve of the proposed signage. Once all review comments are addressed, the project will be referred for historic review. |
|
| 11/14/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Denied | PERMIT T13OT01321 FOR: DSA AT: 400 N TOOLE SUITE 280 (HISTORIC TRAIN DEPOT) APPLICATION MATERIALS ARE INCOMPLETE, UNABLE TO REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE SIGN CODE. RESUBMIT FULL AND COMPLETED APPLICATION AND DRAWINGS WITH LETTER FROM A LICENSED CONTRACTOR THAT ALLOWS FAST SIGNS TO RUN THE PERMIT IN THEIR NAME. PROVIDE LETTER FROM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INDICATING THEY HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE. THE HISTORIC DEPOT SIGN CRITERIA SHOULD BE FOLLOWED. ONCE SIGNAGE IS VERIFIED TO MEET THE SIGN CODE, STAFF CAN REFER APPLICANT TO THE HISTORIC REVIEW PROCESS. |