Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: SIGN SITE REVIEW
Permit Number - T13OT01285
Inspection Description - SIGN SITE REVIEW
Inspection Status - Approved
Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
01/07/2014 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Approved | HISTORIC HAS APPROVED THE PROPOSED REVISION TO THE NEON LAYOUT. OK TO RELEASE PERMIT. | |
12/27/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Partial Approval | REGARDING REVISED DESIGN: OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE APPROVED. STRUCTURAL REVIEW APPROVED. SIGN CODE REVIEW APPROVED. READY TO REFER REVISION TO HISTORIC REVIEW FOR 2ND MINOR REVIEW PROCESS. |
|
12/23/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Continued | REVISION SENT IN BY EMAIL. REVIEW CONTINUES. | |
12/18/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Partial Approval | SIGN CODE REVIEW FOR: 256 E CONGRESS, SAINT HOUSE PROPOSED: INSTALL 1 PROJECTING SIGN REVIEW OF REVISION TO SHAPE AND LIGHTING LAYOUT ON NEW SIGN DEC. 18, 2013 1) Per 3-92, Acknowledged the sign is minimum 8' clearance, however, to ensure utmost public safety on the chance someone does manage to reach the bottom of the sign, it should be rounded at the tip and not converge to a sharp point. Please show an enlargement of the end of the arrow. 2) Per 3-82, please list the street frontages on both Congress and Arizona and label "Congress" on the site plan (use the plan in the TRE set please). (Please note, Per LeeRay Hanly, Structural has approved the isometric attachment view of the sign, though it is not an exact representation of the specific shape of the sign, it provides the information necessary for the attachment review. ) Outdoor Lighting Code is also approved. Historic review can be scheduled once staff receives the information on the above items 1 & 2. |
|
12/16/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Continued | REVISION SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. NEW PERMIT FEES APPLY + $82.50 FOR O.L.C., ELECTRIC & STRUCTURAL. | |
12/16/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Continued | PROJECT REVISION APPROVED BY RAY MAJUTA 12/16 FOR ELECTRIC AND OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE. STRUCTURAL AND SIGN CODE REVIEWS REMAIN + 2ND HISTORIC MINOR REVIEW. |
|
12/16/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Continued | STRUCTURAL ATTACHMENT REVISION DETAILS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY LEERAY HANLY 12/16. WITH BOTH STRUCTURAL AND OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE & ELECTRICAL APPROVE, ONLY SIGN CODE REVIEW REMAINS TO BE DONE - WHEN DONE, IF SIGN CODE MET, WILL REFER TO HISTORIC MINOR REVIEW #2. |
|
12/04/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Continued | CONTRACTOR ADVISES THE APPLICANT HAS CHOSEN TO CHANGE THEIR DESIGN AND WILL RESUBMIT. NEW PERMIT REVIEW FEES APPLY + $82.50 FOR ADDITIONAL TIME ON OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE, ELECTRIC AND STRUCTURAL. | |
11/29/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Continued | HISTORIC MINOR REVIEW DONE IN FIELD 11/29. | |
11/22/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Correction Required | SAINT HOUSE NEW ILLUMINATED PROJECTING SIGN. PERMIT T13OT01285 4RD REVIEW - UPDATE (REVISED MOUNTING DETAIL SENT) ***HISTORIC REVIEW REQUIRED*** (BUILDING IS ELIGIBLE FOR NATL. REGISTER AND IS WITHIN DOWNTOWN). MINOR REVIEW CAN BE DONE IN FIELD PER HISTORIC DIVISION. APPLICATION AND FEE REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR REFERRED 11/20 TO HISTORIC REVIEW PROCESS: PROPOSAL MEETS SIGN CODE ALLOWANCES PER H.THRALL PROPOSAL MEETS OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE PER R.MAJUTA SUBJECT TO TRE 2013 -026 STRUCTURAL APPROVED MOUNTING DETAIL 11/22/13. |
|
11/20/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Correction Required | SAINT HOUSE NEW ILLUMINATED PROJECTING SIGN. PERMIT T13OT01285 3RD REVIEW - UPDATE ***HISTORIC REVIEW REQUIRED*** (BUILDING IS ELIGIBLE FOR NATL. REGISTER AND IS WITHIN DOWNTOWN). MINOR REVIEW CAN BE DONE IN FIELD PER HISTORIC DIVISION. APPLICATION AND FEE REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR REFERRED 11/20 TO HISTORIC REVIEW PROCESS: PROPOSAL MEETS SIGN CODE ALLOWANCES PER H.THRALL PROPOSAL MEETS OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE PER R.MAJUTA SUBJECT TO TRE 2013 -026 PER LEERAY HANLY STRUCTURAL REVIEW 11/18/13: 1) INSPECTION CONDUCTED 11/20 CONFIRMS THICKER COLUMN ON WALL WHERE SIGN TO BE INSTALLED. POSSIBLE TO EPOXY BOLT WITH 6" EMBED. SPECIFY EPOXY. CONTRACTOR INFORMED. |
|
11/18/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Correction Required | SAINT HOUSE NEW ILLUMINATED PROJECTING SIGN. PERMIT T13OT01285 2nd REVIEW ***HISTORIC REVIEW REQUIRED*** (BUILDING IS ELIGIBLE FOR NATL. REGISTER AND IS WITHIN DOWNTOWN). MINOR REVIEW CAN BE DONE IN FIELD. APPLICATION AND FEE REQUIRED. REVIEW WILL BE DONE ONCE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED - AND BEFORE SIGN PERMIT IS RELEASED: PROPOSAL MEETS SIGN CODE ALLOWANCES PER H.THRALL PROPOSAL MEETS OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE PER R.MAJUTA SUBJECT TO TRE 2013 -026 PER LEERAY HANLY STRUCTURAL REVIEW 11/18/13: 1) DEMONSTRATE HOW EMBEDDING INTO 4" BRICK. THIS LOCATION IS NOT A FULL GROUTED WALL. NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION SHOWN IN DIAGRAM. PROVIDE ANALYSIS AT DOUBLE -WYTHE STORE FRONT. CONTRACTOR CONTACTED VIA EMAIL WITH LEERAY'S RED LINED NOTATIONS ON CONNECTION DRAWING. |
|
11/13/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Continued | RECEIVED REVISIONS FROM CONTRACTOR. REVIEW MATERIAL CONTINUES. | |
11/07/2013 | SIGN SITE REVIEW | Correction Required | SAINT HOUSE NEW ILLUMINATED PROJECTING SIGN. PERMIT T13OT01285 ***HISTORIC REVIEW REQUIRED*** (BUILDING IS ELIGIBLE FOR NATL. REGISTER AND IS WITHIN DOWNTOWN). MINOR REVIEW CAN BE DONE IN FIELD. APPLICATION AND FEE REQUIRED. REVIEW WILL BE DONE ONCE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED - AND BEFORE SIGN PERMIT IS RELEASED: PROPOSAL MEETS SIGN CODE ALLOWANCES PER H.THRALL, HOWEVER, A SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED SHOWING PROPERTY LINE, AND FULL EXTENSION OF SIGN AT 4.9 PROJECTION INTO RIGHT OF WAY. DIMENSION BUILDING FRONTAGE ON BOTH STREETS. PROPOSAL MEETS OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE PER R.MAJUTA SUBJECT TO TRE 2013-026 - SITE PLAN DETAIL WILL BE USED FOR TRE AMENDMENT (CURRENT PROJECTION LISTED AT 4.5) PER LEERAY HANLY STRUCTURAL REVIEW 11/7/13: 1) CLARIFY WEIGHT OF SIGN 2) PROVIDE AREA & WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS 3) PROVIDE ANCHOR INFORMATION FOR INSTALLATION INTO BRICK 4) THE PROPOSED 5/8" WEDGE ANCHORS ARE NOT LISTED FOR CRACKED MASONRY. CONTRACTOR CONTACTED VIA EMAIL WITH LEERAY'S RED LINED NOTATIONS ON CONNECTION DRAWING. |