Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE
Case Number - T09DV03692
Inspection Description - INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE
Inspection Status - Approved
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/03/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | ON SITE INSPECTION WITH SUPERVISOR, PORCH WAS RE ENFORCED, ALL VIOLATIONS ABATED CLOSE CASE |
|
| 10/08/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | ON SITE INSPECTION WITH SUPERVISOR, OWNER IS 90 PERCENT COMPLETED WITH RE ENFORCING THE PORCH. SUPERVISOR GRANTED A 30 DAY EXTENSION TO COMPLETE THE REPAIR, FOLLOW UP DUE IN 30 DAYS. | |
| 08/20/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | SITE VISIT, THE OWNER WANTS TO DETACH THE PORCH. SUPERVISOR APPROVED THE PORCH TO BE DETACH IS LONG IS IT DOES NOT EXCEED 120 SQUARE FEET, ALSO THERE IS A 6X6 STRUCTURE THAT MUST BE DEMOLISHED. OWNER AGREED AND WAS GRANTED 30 DAYS TO DO SO. | |
| 07/09/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | RECEIVED ESTIMATE OF 565.00 FROM CONTRACTOR, ADMINISTRATOR ADVISED TO CONDUCT FOLLOW INSPECTION IN 30 DAYS | |
| 07/08/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | MET CONTRACTOR (BATHCREST) ON SITE FOR ESTIMATE OF THE PORCH DEMOLISHMENT. SUPERVISOR ON SITE. MATT WILL FAX ESTIMATE TO OFFICE. |
|
| 07/01/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | WILL SCHEDULED CONTRACTOR TO MEET ONSITE FOR AN ESTIMATE OF THE DEMO WORK PER ADMINISTRATOR ORDERS. | |
| 06/30/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | INSPECTOR EXPLAINS THAT THE ADDITION WERE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 1998, CITY'S POLICY STATES CONSTRUCTION DONE PRIOR TO 1998 WILL NOT BE ADDRESSED IF THERE ARE NO LIFE SAFETY ISSUES. THERE WAS A FULL SERVICE UPGRADE COMPLETED UNDER PERMIT. THE CITY WILL NOT ADDRESS THE ADDITIONS. THE DEFENDANT DID NOT COMPLY WITH THE JUDGES LAST ORDERS AS TO HAVE A PERMIT IN ISSUED STATUS FOR THE PORCHES. THE CITY REQUEST AN ORDER TO DEMOLISH THE PORCH STRUCTURES THE JUDGE DID GRANT THE ORDER TO DEMOLISH THE PORCHES |
|
| 06/24/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | OWNER APPLIED FOR A PERMIT FOR A SHADE STRUCTURE, D.S.D. ZONING REVIEW WAS DENIED THE PERMIT APPLICATION | |
| 05/12/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | COMP/HEARING WAS HELD DEFENDANT WAS PRESENT. THE REFUSE IS IN COMPLIANCE AS OF 3-15-2010, SUPERVISOR PRESENT ON SITE. INSPECTOR TESTIFIED THAT NO PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR THE ADDITIONS OR DEMOLISHMENT OF THE PORCH STRUCTURES AS REQUIRED. THE DEFENDANT STATED THAT HE HAS BRACED THE PORCHES WITH POSTS AND BEAMS. THE JUDGE ASKED IF THAT WAS SUFFICIENT, I SAID THAT I HAVE NOT SEEN THE SO CALLED IMPROVEMENTS AND THEY WERE DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT. I EXPLAINED TO THE JUDGE THAT THE PORCHES ARE DILAPIDATED AND CONSTRUCTED IN A POOR MANNER THERE IS NO APPROVED HARDWARE OR CONNECTORS AS REQUIRED PER THE BUILDING CODE. THE PORCH IS ATTACHED TO AN UNPERMITTED ADDITION. THE CITY ASKED FOR AN ORDER TO ENTER THE PROPERTY AND DEMOLISHED THE PORCHES ALSO THE DEFENDANT IS TO HAVE THE ADDITIONS PERMITTED PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE ABATEMENT ORDER. THE JUDGE ORDER A COMPLIANCE HEARING SET FOR 6-28-2010. WHICH THE DEFENDANT TO HAVE A PERMIT IN ISSUED STATUS OR AN ORDER TO THE CITY TO DEMOLISH THE PORCHES. |
|
| 03/16/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | SUPERVISOR ON SITE, MET WITH OWNER AND GAVE HIM THE COURTS MINUTES ADVISING HIM OF THE NEXT COURT DATE OF 5-12-2010 0930, ALL REFUSES IN THE BACKYARD HAS BEEN REMOVED. VIOLATIONS THAT LACK ARE THE DEMOLISHMENT OF THE TWO PORCHES AND PLANS FOR THE ADDITIONS CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT PERMITS | |
| 03/15/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | ELECTRICAL SERVICE GRADE PERMIT WAS FINAL DEFENDANT DID SHOW UP TO COURT, I ADVISED THE JUDGE OF THE PERMIT STATUS AND VIOLATIONS THAT LACK ARE THE DEMOLISHMENT OF THE TWO PORCHES, REFUSE AND PERMIT THE ADDITIONS. JUDGE SET COMPLIANCE FOR 5-12-2010 0930 |
|
| 01/13/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | COMP/ HEARING DEFENDANT PRESENTED A ELECTRICAL ESTIMATE FOR SOME WORK. NO PERMIT OR PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, NO PERMITS OBTAINED FOR THE DEMOLISHMENT OF THE DILAPIDATED ATTACHED PORCH STRUCTURES. NO REMOVAL OF THE REFUSE. JUDGE GRANTED A 60 DAY EXTENSION , COMPLY HEARING SET FOR MARCH 15-2010 2:00 PM |
|
| 01/13/2010 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | ON SITE INSPECTION CAN NOT SEE BACK YARD AREA. CHECKED PERMITS PLUS NO DEMO PERMITS OR ANY OTHER PERMIT IN THE SYSTEM. CHARGE A 75.OO RE INSPECTION FEE. | |
| 12/08/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | CITY OF TUCSON REQUEST A COURT ORDER TO CONDEMN THE DWELLING AND TERMINATE ALL UTILITIES, DEMOLISH THE REAR AND EASTSIDE DILAPIDATED PORCHES. REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS FROM THE PROPERTY. THE DID JUDGE FIND THE DEFENDANT RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL 3 CHARGES AND ORDERED THAT BY JAN 13, 2010 THE DEFENDANT IS TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH DOCUMENTS FROM A LICENSED CONTRACTOR WHICH STATES THE STRUCTURAL CONDITION OF THE ADDITIONS AND PORCHES ON THE PROPERTY ALSO A PLAN TO ABATE THE VIOLATIONS. | |
| 10/16/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE WAS SERVE TO OWNER BY HAWKINS AND EZ MESSENGER | |
| 10/13/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | ADMINISTRATOR AUTHORIZIED THE USE OF PROCESS SERVER FOR CITATION, COMPLETED FORM AND GAVE TO AA TO PROCESS. RE INSPECTION FEES WILL BE CHARGED | |
| 10/09/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | ON SITE INSPECTION WITH SUPERVISOR, SPOKE TO OWNER CARLOS HE STATED HE HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING AND WILL NOT DO ANYTHING VERY ANGRY. AT THIS TIME WILL SPEAK TO ADMINISTRATOR ON PROCESS SERVER ROUTE. |