Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE
Case Number - T08DV03392
Inspection Description - INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE
Inspection Status - Approved
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/29/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OBTAINED | |
| 07/14/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | I posted the condemnation notice along with a copy court order on the front door. Keep vacant signs were posted in the front and rear of the chain link fence of the property per the court order. All vehicles, storage containers and trash has been removed from the property. I felt since the property violations have been abated I saw no reason to chain and lock the gates. I will continue to monitor the property. | |
| 07/02/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | Compliance hearing was held this morning at 0830 the defendant Denise Eddows was not present again. The judge asked for a status on this case, I responded that there has been no change or effort for abatement. I advised the court of the letter that I served personally. The building is occupied and the landscape company continues there business with no approvals from the City of Tucson. At this time I request an abatement order. The Judges order reads as follows Inspector Valdez present Ms Eddows again failed to be present and is in default. Property has not been brought into compliance and violations have not been abated. RE - Property 225 W Grant RD Tucson Az. The property is ordered to be vacated until a certificate of occupancy is issued. All outdoor storage of materials and equipment is to be removed as is any refuse and trash. Failing to comply with this order by July 13, 2009. the City of Tucson is directed to take such action as necessary to effectuate this order. All costs involved will be the responsibility of Denise Eddows. |
|
| 06/05/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | SITE VISIT WITH INSPECTOR SMITH I HAND DELIVERED LETTER REQUIRED BY THE COURTS TO DENISE EDDOWS, SHE STATED THAT SHE RECEIVED GREEN CARD BUT WILL PICK UP CERT LETTER ON MONDAY. AT THIS TIME THE LANDSCAPING COMPANY AND EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS WERE STILL ON SITE. | |
| 05/12/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | DEFENDANT DID NOT SHOW, NO EVIDENCE OF ANY POSTIVE STEP TOWARDS ABATEMENT THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUEST AN ORDER TO VACATE THE BUILDING AND REMOVE ALL EQUIPMENT, DEBRIS FROM PROPERTY. THE JUDGE ORDER THAT A WRITTEN LETTER BEING CERTIFIED MAILED TO ONWER WHICH WOULD STATE THE ALL CRITERIA IN THE SITY OF TUSCON REQUEST. | |
| 04/27/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION LETTERTO OWNER STATES C OF 0 REQUIRED ADDED BUSINESS MUST VACATE FLOOR AND SITE PLAN REQUIRED | |
| 04/09/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | DSD LETTER TO OWNER STATES C OF 0 REQUIRED ADDED BUSINESS MUST VACATE FLOOR AND SITE PLAN REQUIRED | |
| 03/26/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | 03-262009, Defendant does appear and states she has submitted a letter to The City of Tucson Development Service Department requesting non conforming status. Inspector Valdez, testifies insufficient progress and the Certificate of Occupancy has not been addressed. The Inspector Valdez states the City of Tucson will give the defendant a checklist to ensure proper steps are taken to abate the violations in a timely manner. The defendant responded that at the class she took at The City of Tucson Development Service Department she was told a Certificate of Occupancy is not required for her building. Inspector Valdez stated in the future all instructions given by the City of Tucson would need to be in a written format from the zoning administrator, hear say is not proper evidence. Inspector Valdez also stated The IBC does require a Certificate of Occupancy regardless if non conforming status is granted or not. The judge order the City of Tucson to send the defendant proper instructions in a checklist format and instructs the defendant to bring in any documentation of such comment of a Certificate of Occupancy not being required. Set compliance hearing for 05-12-2009. Letter submitted to Administrator | |
| 02/24/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | 2-24-2009 HAD COMPLIANCE HEARING DEFENDANT DID SHOW UP. THE CITY ADMITTED LETTER FROM D.S.D. ZONING DEPARTMENT THAT STATES NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN TO ABATE THE VIOLATIONS SUCH AS NO SITE PLAN FOR THE USE OF LAND AND NO PERMITS ISSUED OR APPLIED FOR. THE JUDGE DID EXPLAIN DEFENDANT RIGHTS. SHE DID NOT APPEAR FOR PAST HEARING ON 11-13-2008, 1-14-2009. THE CASE IS IN DEFAULT THEREFORE THE DEFENDANT HAS NO APPEAL RIGHTS. FINES UP TO DATE ARE 670.00. THE DEFENDANT TESTIFIED THAT HER BUSINESS IS IN THE GRANT RD AREA AND STATED THAT THE CITY WAS TAKING OVER THE PROPERTY BUT SHE HAS NO EVIDENCE OF THAT ACTION. THE JUDGE STATED UNTIL THAT ACTION TAKE PLACE, SHE AT THIS TIME IS THE PROPERTY OWNER AND IS RESPONSIBLE. THE JUDGE GRANTED ANOTHER EXTENDED ABATEMENT PERIOD DUE 3-25-09. COMPLIANCE HEARING SET FOR 3-26-09 |
|
| 01/14/2009 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | Compliance hearing held, defendant did not show up and was found in default again. Judge order addition fines of 200.00. The Judge order an extended abatement period till Feb 17, 2009. I will get a letter from DSD that states no compliance. The Compliance hearing is set for Feb 24, 2009 2:00 PM |
|
| 11/17/2008 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | Delivered court minutes and gave to assistant in office at 1:53 PM | |
| 11/13/2008 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | COMPLIANCE HEARING AT 0830 DEFENDANT DID NOT SHOW UP JUDGE FOUND DEFENDANT IN DEFAULT 3 CHARGE FINED 300.00 SET COMPLIANCE HEARING FOR JAN 14TH 2009 FOR 1:30 PM NOTES OWNER DID HAVE ALL REFUSE REMOVED DUE TO BOTH LOTS HAVING BEEN COMBINED DOCKET # CO8107453 WAS DISMISSED. NO PERMIT FOR THE C OF 0 HAS BEEN ISSUED NO COMPLIANCE REVIEW HAS BEEN SUBMITTED VEHICLES AT THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY BELONGING TO ROMANOS LANDSCAPE BUSINESS STILL REMAIN ON SITE. |