Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/25/2008 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | A FOLLOWUP INSPECTION FOR THE VIOLATIONS FOUND ON INITIAL INSPECTION OF 4/1/08. INSPECTOR PUMPHREY AND PORTILLO PRESENT, AS WELL AS MR. ALEXANDER AND ASSSITANT MR. SCOTT RAYMOND, WHO WAS THERE TO RECORD THE INSPECTION. 1. CRANKS HAVE BEEN REPLACED-COMPLIANT, BUT SECONDARY BATHROOM WINDOW DOES NOT OPEN- WILL FOLLOWUP AS NEW ISSUE. 2. NO LEAK UNDER KITCHEN SINK- COMPLIANT; BEDROOM AREA IS DRY AND NO LEAK IS PRESENT-COMPLIANT; TOILET SEAL IN MAIN BATHROOM IS DRY WITH NO LEAK VISIBLE-COMPLIANT; HOT WATER IN SINK OF SECONDARY BATHROOM IS IN WORKING ORDER AND FLOWS WELL-COMPLIANT. 3- WATER HEATER STILL NEEDS PERMIT- OWNER IS WORKING WITH PLUMBER WHO WILL BE OUT TODAY- FOLLOW-UP. 4- SEAL UNDER FRONT DOOR IS IN WORKING ORDER; WEATHERPROOFING ON DOORS IS SUFFICIENT AND NOT A VIOLATION-COMPLIANT. MR. ALEXANDER ALSO BROUGHT UP A WALL SCONCE IN HALLWAY THAT APPEARED TO BE SHORTING OUT, BUT TURNED OUT TO JUST NEED THE BULB SCREWED IN TIGHTER. WEST DOOR IN LIVING ROOM, WHICH OPENED ON 7/7/08, DOES NOT OPEN, APPARENTLY FROM A MALFUNCTIONING LOCK. INTERIOR DOOR LOCKS APPEARED TO HAVE BEEN INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR DOOR OFF KITCHEN AND FRONT DOOR- NOT A VIOLATION, BUT WILL BE ASKED OF OWNER. MR. ALEXANDER STATES HE DOES NOT HAVE ALL KEYS TO ALL DOOR LOCKS--NO VIOLATION DUE TO FACT HE CAN EXIT AND HAS EGRESS TO OUTSIDE, BUT WILL BE REQUESTED OF OWNER. MR. ALEXANDER ALSO BROUGHT UP ADA COMPLAINTS CONCERNING ISSUES SUCH AS RAMPS. HE WAS ADVISED AGAIN TO ADRESS THESE THROUGH THE OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY PROGRAMS, AS WE DO NOT ENFORCE THE ADA. OWNER CARLOS GALLEGOS WAS CONTACTED AFTER THE INSPECTION TO ADDRESS THE NEW ISSUES; IT WAS AGREED TO FAX THE ISSUES TO MR. GALLEGOS. HE ALSO STATED IF MR. ALEXANDER HAS NOT TOLD HIM OF THESE NEW ISSUES PREVIOUSLY. |
|
| 07/21/2008 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | CASE WAS REOPENED. I TRAVELED TO SITE TO PERFORM A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED WITH MR. ALEXANDER. UPON ENTRY OF HOME, MR. ALEXANDER INTRODUCED A LAWYER HE HAD RETAINED FROM WHAT I PERCEIVED TO BE SALA (SOUTHERN ARIZONA LEGAL AID) TO RECORD THE INSPECTION AND MY ACTIONS. I ADVISED MR. ALEXANDER THAT HE HAD MISREPRESENTED TO ME HIS INTENTIONS IN SCHEDULING THIS FOLLOWUP; I TOLD HIM I WAS NOT GOING TO CONDUCT AN INSPECTION AT THIS TIME AND WOULD RESCHEDULE AN INSPECTION AT ANOTHER TIME IN ORDER TO HAVE A SUPERVISOR PRESENT. I APOLOGIZED FOR THE INCONVENIENCE. | |
| 07/07/2008 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | A FOLLOWUP INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED BY SUPERVISOR PORTILLO AND INSPECTOR PUMPHREY AT THE REQUEST OF THE TENANT, MR. ALEXANDER, ONE DAY PRIOR TO ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOLLOWUP. TENANT WAS HOME AND ALLOWED ENTRY. TWO DOORS IN FRONT LIVING ROOM, ONE DOOR IN FAMILY ROOM, CARPORT GATE, AND KITCHEN WINDOW WERE INSPECTED WITH NO VIOLATIONS FOUND. TENANT THEN ASKED INSPECTORS TO LEAVE WITHOUT COMPLETING A FULL INSPECTION. CASE WILL BE CLOSED PENDING ACCESS TO PROPERTY FOR FOLLOWUP. |