Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
Case Number - T05DV00689
Inspection Description - INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
Inspection Status - Approved
Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
01/26/2006 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | VISITED SITE, KNOCKED ON DOOR, RECIEVED NO ANSWER. POSTED STRUCTURE WITH NOV FOR WORK WITHOUT PERMITS. INCLUDED LETTER TO JOHN PATTERSON BASICALLY STATING THAT WE CAN WORK WITH ONLY IF HE INFORMS OF HWAT HIS PLANS ARE WITH THE PROPERTY AND STRUCTURE WITH TIME LINES ETC.. POSTED BOTH NOTIFICATIONS ON WINDOW. TRIED CALLING JOHN PRIOR TO ARRIVING ON SITE AND LEFT MESSAGE THAT I WOULD BE POSTING STRUCTURE, TO PLEASE CALL CELL AND INFORM ME OF INTENTIONS.WILL PROCEED ONCE WE HEAR FROM JOHN PATTERSON. | |
01/11/2006 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | VISITED SITE, MET WITH OWNER JOHN PATTISON. WITH HIM HE HAD KATIE BULGER, GEORGE PETTIT FROM WARD 3 LYNN FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. JOHN BEGAN BY GIVING A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE HOUSE, PARENTS, AND WHEN THE HOUSE WAS BUILT. EXPLAINED HIS FATHER PASSED AWAY AND THAT HE INHEIRETED THE PROPERTY IN A FAMILY TRUST ALONG WITH 5 OTHER SIBLINGS. JOHN MENTIONED THAT HE HAS TAKEN ON THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR RESTORING THE BUILDING AND THAT THE ESTIMATED RESTORATION TIME OF TWO YEARS HAS TURNED INTO TEN. WE TALKED ABOUT THE CASE MARTIN TESTER HAD OPENED IN 6/96 AND CLOSED IN 5/97 AND JOHN FELT OR MENTIONED THAT HE WAS SOMEHWHAT FORGIVING AND CLOSED THE CASE REALIZING THAT THE HOUSE WAS BUILT WHEN THERE WERE NO CODES OR NEED FOR PERMITS. JOHN EXPLAINED THAT HE WAS TRYING TO REBUILD, TRYING TO USE LIKE OR SIMILAR MATERIALS TO THE ORIGINAL STRUCTURE WHICH HAS BEEN DIFFICUILT BECASEU MORE PROBLEMS HAD ARISEN SINCE HE BEGAN THE PROJECT FOR EXAMPLE THE PILLAR BUILT TO THE WEST IF THE RIIN UN QUESTION WHICH WAS TO BE DUPLICATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, IT WAS NOT CLEAR WHAT THE PILLARS WERE FOR. I EXPLAINED TO THE GROUP THAT THERE WERE NOT JUST MY VIOLATIONS BUT OTHER VIOLATIONS ON THE PROPERTY THAT MAY HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED BY FIRE, ES, OR DSD. I WENT OVER SITUATIONS WITH JOHN AND EXPLAINED TO KATIE BULGER THAT IF I WERE TO JUST WALK AWAY, OUR DEPARTMENT WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE SHOULD AN ACCIDENT OCCUR. I ASKED KATIE WOULD THE WARD BE WILLING TO TAKE ANY RESPONSIBILITY, SHE HAD NO ANSWER. THE MEETING ENDED WITH ME EXPLAINING THAT BEFORE TAKING ANY ACTION I WOULD MEET WITH MY SUPERVISORS TO DETERMINE WHAT WOULD TAKE PLACE FROM HERE. | |
01/10/2006 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | VISITED SITE, FOUND THREE STRUCTURES ON SITE. CENTER STRUCTURE ROOF WAS IN A DILAPTIATED STATE. KNOCKED ON DOORS OF ALL THREE STRUCTURES AND RECEIVED NO ANSWERS. WROTE A LETTER ON AN INSPECTION REQUEST FORM STATING OUR DEPARTMENT HAD AN OPEN CASE, I NEEDED TO GATHER INFORMATION, AND IF OCCUPANTS COULD PLEASE CALL. POSTED LETTER ON ALL THREE STRUCTURES. TOOK PICTURES OF THE PREMISES. ALL BUILDINGS APPEARED IN NEED OF CARE. FOUND BATS, TRACTORS, CARS, TRUCKS AND SMALL EQUIPMENT THROUGHOUT THE PREMISES. TRASH AND DEBRIS EVERYWHERE. WILL FOLLOW UP ONCE I'VE RECEIVED A CALL FROM OWNER OR OCCUPANTS. SPOKE WITH A NEIGHBOR WHO MENTIONED ORIGINAL OWNER PASSED AWAY AND PROPERTY WAS LEFT TO SON, MENTIONED IT WAS AN INTERESTING PROPERTY AS IT HAS BEEN ADDED ONTO MANY TIMES. APPEARS PROPERTY HAS BEEN COMBINED WITH 1845. VISITED DSD RECORDS, FOUND LAST INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED BY MARTIN TESTER IN JUNE OF 1996, CASE WAS CLOSED IN MAY 12TH 1997. IT WAS FOR WORK WITHOUT PERMITS, AND THE 1997 INSPECTION STATED "VIOLATIONS CORRECTED" |