Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
Case Number - T05DV00378
Inspection Description - INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT
Inspection Status - Approved
Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
05/25/2005 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | Approved | 5/25/05 ARRIVED ON SITE, AFTER SEVERAL PHONE CALLS TO DIFFERENT PEOPLE I WAS ABLE TO LOCATE OWNER ERNESTO BUJANDA WHO SHORTLY THERE AFTER MET ME ON SITE.FOUND STRUCTURE (BUILDING) ITSELF TO E SECURED, ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS TO PROPERTY WERE IN PLACE AND LOCKED.WALKED PERIMETER OF BUILDING AND FOUND CHAINLINK FENCE HAD BEEN VIOLATED ALLOWING ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY. ALL OTHER EXTERIOR BARRIER FENCING AND GATES WERE IN PLACE, ALL GATES HAD LOCKS. OWNER SLID METAL DOOR AT BACK OR WEST END OF STRUCTURE OPEN AND UNHOOKED A CHAIN THAT ALLOWED DOOR TO OPEN ALL THE WAY. WALKED INTERIOR OF THE PROPERTY, FOUND THAT THE UNIT AT ONE TIME MAY HAVE BEEN HOUSING TRANSIENTS, THERE WERE BAGS WITH CLOTHES, BOTTLES, AND FOOD WRAPPERS, BUT ALL THOSE ITEMS HAD ALREADY ACCUMULATED A GOOD AMOUNT OF DUST. THERE WAS ALSO BEDDING AND BLANKETS ALSO QUITE DUSTY AND IT APPEARED AS NO ONE HAD BEEN ON PROPERTY RECENTLY. I ASKED OWNER TO RE-SECURE THE BACK METAL DOOR EVEN THOUGH IT HAD THE SMALL CHAIN ON IT AND ALSO ASKED THAT HE SECURE THE FENCE. ALSO RECOMMENDED THAT THE DOOR TO THE S/W BE PROPERLY SECURED WITH PLYWOOD BECAUSE THE EXTERIOR DOOR WAS A INTERIOR TYPE DOOR PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR. FOUND NO OTHER UNSECURED AREAS. WROTE VACANT AND UNSECURED NOV ON SITE AND HAND DELIVERED. ALLOWED 5 DAYS TO SECURE THE PROPERTY. |