Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2005 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | AFTER SEVERAL FAILED ATTEMPTS BY OWNER AND INSPECTOR TO MEET APPOINTMENT TIMES, AN INSPECTION WAS SET UP AND FOLLOWED THRU ON. VISITED SITE, MET WITH BOYFRIEND OF OWNER'S DAUGHTER WHO MENTIONED THAT HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR ABATING THE ELECTRICAL ISSUE. ASKED IF I COULD SEE THE OUTLET, BOYFRIEND ALLOWED ME ENTRY, FOUND THAT OUTLET HAD BEEN REMOVED. BOYFRIEND MENTIONED THAT BECAUSE ELEVTRICAL BOX HAD NOT BEEN INSTALLED CORRECTLY IN THE WALL AND KEPT FALLING OUT, THAT HE COMPLETELY COVERED THE OPENING BY USING TWO COVER PLATES INSTALLED HORIZONTALLY. PICTURE WAS TAKEN ,ISSUE ABATED. DNR HAS NO FURTHER ISSUES, CASE CLOSED!! |
|
| 08/03/2005 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | VISITED SITE, KNOCKED ON DOOR, COULD HEAR SOMEONE INSIDE THE STRUCTURE, NO ANSWER. CALLED AND SPOKE WITH INSPECTOR 2, RICK SALDATE, MENTIONED MY FRUSTRATIONS CONCERNING CASE OVER ONE RECEPTICLE. RICK MENTIONED THAT IF I HAD A TRIPLICATE INSPECTION REQUEST FORM TO LEAVE A LETTER ASKING OCCUPANTS TO PLEASE REPLY WITHIN 48 HR. OR THAT ACTIONS WOULD BE TAKEN AGAINST THEM IN COURT. WROTE AND POSTED LETTER, LETTER WILL BE ADDED TO CASE FILE. TENANT HAS 48HRS. TO REPLY. PICTURES WERE TAKEN. | |
| 07/25/2005 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | 7/25/05 VISITED SITE ON FOLLOW UP INSPECTION, KNOCKED ON DOOR, DOOR WAS ANSWERED BY A FEMALE RESIDENT, ANGELA( NOT FAMILIAR) AND TWO MALES. I EXPLAINED TO THEM WHO I WAS AND WHY I WAS THERE, MENTIONED THAT I WAS BACK FOR A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION FOR THE FAULTY ELECTRICAL, ALL THREE ADULTS MENTIONED THAT THEY KNEW NOTHING OF THE CITATION, WHAT, WHEN, OR WHY IT WAS ISSUED.I WALKED THEM BACK TO THE MIDDLE BEDROOM WHERE THE VIOLATION WAS FOUND, AND AT THIS TIME A BED HAD BEEN PUSHED BACK AGAINST THE WALL HIDING THE ELECTRICAL BOX. I FOUND THE ELECTRICAL BOX HAD NOT BEEN PROPERLY INSTALLED BUT A COVER PLATE HAD BEEN PLACED ON THE RECEPTICLE. TENANT MENTIONED THAT HE HAD PLACED THE BED IN FRONT OF THE RECEPTICLE BECAUSE HE FELT THAT IT WAS A HAZARD. BECAUSE THE THREE ADULTS MENTIONED THAT THEY KNEW NOTHING OF THE NOV I TOLD THEM THAT I WOULD EXTEND THE VIOLATION A WEEK, GIVING THEM TIME TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION. I EXPLAINED TO THEM WHAT NEEDED TO BE DONE TO REPAIR THE RECEPTICLE AND ABATE THE ISSUE. BECAUSE I DID NOT RECOGNIZE ANY OF THE OCCUPANTS I WILL FOLLOW WITH CPS WORKER WHO WAS ORIGINALLY HERE FOR THE INITIAL INSPECTION TO MAKE SURE THE OCCUPANTS ARE SUPPOSE TO BE HERE AS WELL AS THE CHILDREN AS TWO CHILDREN WERE REMOVED FROM THE HOME. THERE WERE THREE CHILDREN INSIDE THE HOME. PICTURES WERE TAKEN. | |
| 05/18/2005 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | Approved | 5/18/2005 INSPECTORS C-16 AND C-5 VISITED SITE, KNOCKED ON OWNERS DOOR, RECEIVED NO ANSWER. DID LEAVE A CARD IN DOOR WITH CONTACT NUMBERS AND A BRIEF TO PLEASE CALL. |