Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: GRADING - FINAL
Permit Number - T05BU00129
Inspection Description - GRADING - FINAL
Inspection Status - Approved
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/18/2007 | GRADING - FINAL | Approved | FINAL GRADING APPROVED, PER THE REVISED DRAWING SHOWING THE CHANGES MADE TO THE DRAINAGE CHANNEL ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BLDG BEING APPROVED BY THE REVIEW ENGINEER. ALL OTHER GRADING ISSUES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | |
| 08/28/2007 | GRADING - FINAL | Denied | 1) PROVIDE AN APPROVED GRADING PLAN FOR INSPECTION. 2) INSTALL CONCRETE DRAINAGE OUTFALL ALONG NORTH SIDE OF BUILDING PER DETAIL 4/5 ON THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN. (OR) PROVIDE ADRAWING SHOWING EXISTING CHANGES MADE TO THE CHANNEL STAMPED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THE CITY OF TUCSON. 3) RE-INSTALL ROCK RIP RAP ALONG SIDE SLOPES OF THE CENTRAL DRAINAGE CHANNEL PER YOUR APPROVED GRADING PLAN. 4) PROVIDE A TRASH ENCLOSURE THAT MEETS THE CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 6-01. THE CONSTRUCTED ENCLOSURE DOES NOT. 5) INSTALL A CURB CUT AS SHOWN ON YOUR APPROVED GRADING PLAN AT THE NORTH DRAINAGE CHANNEL ON THE EAST OUTFALL. 6) PROVIDE AN ADA COMPLIANT CROSSWALK AT EXISTING HC RAMPS ALONG THE NE CORNER OF THE BUILDING. |
|
| 03/03/2006 | GRADING - FINAL | Denied | I spoke to Leslie about her concerns with the project. I told her that she needs to hire her own building inspector to look at the cracks in her flag stone. I talked to Andy Conner about the clearing, he said that there were no save trees on the site, so all the trees they removed were OK, they will be planting trees as a part of there project. Pima Co Parks is aware of the closure and is working with the contractor. The contractor hopes to be finished with the outfall by 3/17. | |
| 03/01/2006 | GRADING - FINAL | Correction Required | I met Adam Karon and his contractor and Civil Eng. on site and they would like to install 4-24-inch RCP pipe instead of the scupper as shown on the approved plans. The reason is that they over excavated the opening for the scupper and would have to use more concrete to build the scupper. I suggested that they build what is shown on the approved plans. He asked if the opening through the scupper could be made larger to reduce the amount of conc., I told the contractor to get approval from the Structural Eng.before altering the design. If the Structural Eng. approves, I think this will be a better solution then using pipe because it matches the original design of the approved plans. I also met with a neighbor (Leslie Meigs) who is extremely upset with the whole operation. She is concerned with cracks in the exterior of her house due to the jack hammering, loss of trees, dust, loss of wildlife, broken water main, and blocking of the trail. |