Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case: T04DV00319

Parcel: 116127190

Inspection Status: No Violation

Inspection History: INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT

Date Description Inspector Results Comments
04/22/2004 INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT No Violation SITE INSPECTION WAS DONE: THIS PROPERTY IS THE SAME PROPERTY THAT WAS INSPECTED AND ABATED LAST MONTH.
THE UNIT REMAINS SECURED AND THERE WERE NO BEE'S FOUND INSIDE THE FRONT YARD TREE AS STATED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER ACROSS THE STREET.
THAT PROPERTY OWNER DID WALK OVER TO ME WHILE DOING THE PROPERTY INSPECTION YESTERDAY.
SHE STATED THAT SHE WAS THE ONE THAT HAD BEE'S IN HER FRONT YARD BECAUSE OF THE OLDER HOME AT 1607 AND THE OLD TREE. SHE WAS UPSET AND STATED THAT SHE WANTED TO BUY THE OLD HOUSE YET THEY WILL NOT SELL, SHE NOW WANTS IT TORN DOWN AND THE TREE CUT DOWN.
SHE FEELS THE TREE AND OLD HOME ARE SAFE HABOR FOR BEE'S.
SHE STATED THE WARD OFFICE OFFERED TO HAVE HER BEE'S REMOVED FROM HER PROPERTY AT 1606, BUT SHE COULDED WAIT BECAUSE SHE STATED THE BEE HIVE IN HER YARD WAS BIG AND SHE JUST HIRED SOMEONE TO REMOVE THEM. SHE STATE THAT THE BEE'S COME FROM THE OLD HOME AND WHY SHOULD SHE PAY TO REMOVE BEE'S ON HER PROPERTY, SHE STATES THEY FROM FROM THE HOME AT 1607. NO BEE'S WERE FOUND, THERE WAS A TINY WASP NEST ON THE FRONT PORCH WITH (2) WASP.CASE WAS REVIEWED AND WAS FOUND INVAL. CLOSE.