Inspection History Details
Inspection Status: Approved
Inspection History: FOLLOW UP CODE VIOLATION
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/01/2004 | FOLLOW UP CODE VIOLATION | Approved | OWNER SHOWED AND CASE WAS DISMISSED. ALL WORK REMOVED. VIOLATION ABATED. CASE CLOSED. | |
| 02/12/2004 | FOLLOW UP CODE VIOLATION | Approved | STOPPED BY SITE AND SOME WORK HAS BEEN REMOVED. OWNER STATED THAT ONLY THE CARPORT HAD TO BE DONE AND THAT'S ALL HE WAS REMOVING. I STATED THAT IT WAS A COURT ORDER IT BE REMOVED OR PERMITTED AND HE WAS DOING NEITHER. HE WAS GOING TO CONTEST SHE AND REMAINING PORTION. I SAID OK AND LEFT. MET OWNER FROM NEXT DOOR AND GOT PERMISSION TO GO ON HIS PROPERTY AND GET PICTURE TO PRESENT TO COURTS. WALK PROPERTY AND SAW BACK END OF ADDITION AND APPEARS THAT SOMEONE LIVING IN UNIT. | |
| 02/02/2004 | FOLLOW UP CODE VIOLATION | Approved | OWNER DID NOT SHOW, COURT ASK TO POST PROPERTY. RICK SALDATE WAS IN COURT AND WILL WITNESS POSTING. STOPPED AT SITE AND MET SON TO GIVE PAPERWORK TO. SON STATED THAT OWNER WAS OUT OF TOWN. ASKED WHAT THIS WAS ABOUT AND ADVISED THAT FATHER HAD MISSED COURT AND IT WAS HIS DATE HE HAD PICKED ON CONTINUANCE. SAIDE HE WOULD GIVE PAPERWORK TO FATHER WHEN HE COMES IN BACK TO TOWN. WITNESS WAS RICK SALDATE AND NO PICTURE WAS TAKEN DUE TO GAVE PAPERWORK TO SON. NO WORK DONE ON REMOVING OR PERMIT PROCESS. NEXT COURT DATE 2/13/04. |
|
| 12/09/2002 | FOLLOW UP CODE VIOLATION | Violation | COURT IS IN APPEALS PROCESS AND HAS DEC.10 COURT DATE BUT DON'T HAVE TO BE THERE. I HAVE TALKED TO PAT MEHROFF ABOUT THIS CASE. WILL WAIT FOR NEXT COURT HEARING. | |
| 11/05/2002 | FOLLOW UP CODE VIOLATION | Violation | TALK TO PAT MEHROFF AND COURT WAS CHANGED TO NEW DATE FOR COMPLIANCE HEARING. HAVE CALLED OTHER OWNER'S TO LET KNOW. | |
| 09/28/2002 | FOLLOW UP CODE VIOLATION | Approved | CT:RAV MON 10/28/02 @ 3:30 PM | |
| 07/29/2002 | FOLLOW UP CODE VIOLATION | Violation | CITATION ISSUED TO JAMES N CONCANNON FOR WOP | |
| 04/30/2002 | FOLLOW UP CODE VIOLATION | Correction Required | MET OWNER AT SITE AND WAS NOT AWARE OF PERMIT BEING REQUIRED. SAID BOUGHT PROPERTY THAT WAY AND ADVISED HE IS STILL RESPONSIBLE FOR WORK DONE BEFORE PURCHASE. ASK FOR CODES AND REFERENCE AND SAID I WOULD FAX TO HIM ONCE IN OFFICE. HAS WORK DONE TO OTHER AREAS BUT IS TIED TO OTHER ADDRESS AT 2034 E 17TH ST. WILL BE OPENING CASE AT OTHER ADDRESS. ADVISED THAT IF COMMERCIAL RATED WILL NEED ARCHITECT TO DO DRAWINGS FOR PERMITS. REFERENCE FAX TO OWNER. |