Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Inspection Details
Inspection Details
Case Number - CE-VIO0823-04988
Status:
| Date | Description | Inspector | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/07/2023 | COT - ENFC - Code Enforcement - Initial | Scheduled | COMPLAINT WAS CALLED OUT AS A DIVERSION. BOTH TFD AND TPD ARRIVED ON SITE FIRST. TFD HAD TO KICK IN THE DOOR TO GET TO THE OWNER WHO NEEDED TO BE TAKEN TO THE HOSPITAL. EITHER TFD OR TPD COULD HAVE CALLED FOR BOARD UP. TPD OFFICER HAD NO INFORMATION OF WHY THE OCCUPANT WAS TAKEN TO THE HOSPITAL, HOW LONG HE MIGHT BE THERE, WHEN HE WOULD BE COMPING BACK OR IF HE WOULD NEED TO GET BACK INTO THE HOUSE. INSPECTOR TRIED TO FIX THE DOOR JAMB AND DOOR TRIM BUT IT WOULD HAVE MADE NO DIFFERENCE AS THE DEADBOLT WAS BENT AND NO LONGER USABLE TO OPEN THE DOOR. BOARD UP WAS CALLED TO SECURE THE FRONT DOOR WHICH THEY DID DO. CALLED SUPERVISOR AND ASKED IF A NOV WOULD BE REQUIRED, SHE ASKED IF C/E NEEDED TO RESPONDAND I REPLIED THAT EITHER TFD OR TPD COULD HAVE CONTACTED BOARD UP THAT C/E DID NOT NEED TO BE THERE TO SECURE THE BUILDING. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE. |