Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Case: T21DV07443

Case Details

Status:

COMPLIAN

Type:

WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Address:

Entered Date:

10/22/2021

Applicant:

SALCEDO FRANCISCO J

Description:

Neighbor added to his house without permit and built right to my property line

Outstanding Inspections

Case Number: T21DV07443
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Outstanding Inspections - 1
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE None Not Inspected

Completed Inspections

Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T21DV07443
Case Description: WORK WITHOUT PERMITS-RESIDENTL
Total Completed Inspections - 1
End Date Description Inspector Results Comments
10/26/2021 INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT GOODMAN Approved VISITED SITE, MET WITH THE OWNER WHO STATED HE HAD BOUGHT THE PROPERTY APPROX 14 YRS AGO AND THAT THE MAIN STRUCTURE, CARPORT AT THE S/E CORNER OF THE PROPERTY AND THE SHED AT THE N/E CORNER WERE ALL THERE WHEN HE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY. HE STATED HE IS A ELECTRICIAN AND IS NOW TAKING 2 YRS OFF TO CLEAN UP HIS PROPERTY AND HE HAS STARTED BY FIXING THE ROOF ON THE CARPORT WHICH IS BAD CONDITION. HE ALSO WALKED ME THRU THE YARD AND ALLOWED ME TO SEE INSIDE THE SHED WHERE HE HAS ELECTRICAL MATERIALS WERE STORED FOR HIS WORK. HE ALSO HAD BUCKETS OF WIRING THRU OUT THE REAR YARD. I GAVE HIM MY BUSINESS CARD AND EXPLAINED I WOULD HAVE TO RESEARCH THE PROPERTY AFTER THE INFORMATION HE HAD GIVEN ABOUT THE STRUCTURES AND THE LENGTH OF TIME HE HAS BEEN IN THE HOUSE. RESEARCH OF THE PROPERTY FOUND THAT THE MAIN STRUCTURE AND THE CARPORT HAD BEEN IN PLACE SINCE 1998. THE 2002 AERIAL SHOWED THE SHED WAS IN PLACE AND IT DOES APPEAR THE SHED WAS IN PLACE IN 1998 BUT THE BLACK AND WHITE PHOTO AND THE SHADING ON THE AERIAL VIEW MADE IT DIFFICULT TO COMPLETELY BE 100 % SURE, BUT THE SHAPE OF THE STRUCTURE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN THERE BY USING OTHER LAND MARKS ON THE AERIAL VIEW. I WILL LEAN TO THE ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES BEING IN PLACE AS OF 1998, THEREFORE THERE ARE NO VIOLATIONS AS THE STRUCTURES WERE INPLACE BY OR BEFORE 1998. COMPLIANCE / CLOSE CASE.